Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 127

SMSFs investing in overseas real estate

A question I am often asked is whether SMSFs can invest in overseas real estate?

Under the superannuation law, whether SMSFs invest in properties situated in Australia or overseas, the legal requirements are the same. For example:

Sole Purpose Test: The property investment must be made solely to provide retirement benefits for members and cannot be for private use or for use while holidaying in the foreign country.

Trust Deed and investment strategy: The property acquisition must be allowed by the SMSF’s Trust Deed and be consistent with the SMSF’s investment strategy.

Arm’s-length transactions: The purchase price for the property and rental income from the property must be at the market rate.

Related-party acquisitions: The property should not be acquired from members or related parties of the members unless it meets the legal definition of a ‘business real property’.

In-house asset rules: The purchase of the property and leasing of the property must comply with the in-house asset rules under the law.

Borrowing: If borrowing is required, it must be a legally complying Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA).

Understand the ownership laws in the foreign country

If the laws and customs of the foreign country allow a foreign investor (ie the SMSF) to invest directly in real properties (without a local entity intermediary), then the SMSF will not have a problem as long as it satisfies all the requirements of the superannuation law. The SMSF trustee will need to maintain documentary evidence as proof that the SMSF owns the overseas property and that the ownership is recognised in the foreign country.

In many countries, however, a foreign entity cannot hold a property directly. Therefore, an SMSF may need to establish a local entity which buys the property for the SMSF, with the SMSF owning all the interest in the local entity. The local entity may also need to be a taxpayer in that foreign country. As a result, indirect investment in overseas real estate can be a problem for SMSFs.

I have encountered transactions where the SMSF trustees needed to establish a Limited Liability Company (LLC) in the foreign country with its own bank account. The SMSF then invested in the shares of the LLC which then used the capital to finance the acquisition of the overseas property. The LLC is used as a flow-through vehicle for tax purposes. Any tax paid by the LLC may be eligible to be claimed back as a credit in Australia under the double tax agreement.

Watch the ‘in-house asset’ test

The problem with this requirement is that the investment by the SMSF in the LLC is treated as an ‘in-house asset’ under the superannuation law. The law only allows an SMSF to invest in a related entity and for the related entity not to be treated as an in-house asset, if the related entity is a non-geared entity. One of the requirements of a non-geared entity is that it does not have a loan with another entity unless the loan is a deposit with an authorised deposit taking institution which falls within the auspices of the Banking Act 1999. Unfortunately, overseas bank accounts do not comply with our banking legislation and therefore the SMSF investment in the LLC would be considered an in-house asset. This means the SMSF is restricted to an investment in the LLC of 5% of the total value of its assets.

An SMSF trustee would also need to consider the risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency and exchange rates. All superannuation assets need to be converted into Australian dollars for financial statements. The dollar variations could affect other calculations in SMSFs such as member balances and minimum pension payment requirements.

If an SMSF needs to enter into a LRBA to acquire an overseas property, it may have difficulties finding a lender, as the lender would be lending money to the SMSF to acquire shares in the LLC. Most banks will not lend if the security on the LRBA is overseas shares. If a foreign bank provides the loan to an SMSF, the documentation on the loan may not be consistent with the LRBA requirements under the superannuation law and the nature of the loan may, therefore, not be limited recourse.

Overseas investments can be complex and also come with higher risk due to the laws and customs of the foreign country. SMSF trustees need to consider overseas investments very carefully.

Monica Rule is an SMSF specialist and author, see www.monicarule.com.au. This article is general education only and readers should seek specialist advice before taking action.

RELATED ARTICLES

The impact of our marriage breakdown on our SMSF

Six warning bells against property spruikers

Court holds SMSF trustees accountable

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Five ways the Retirement Review points to new policies

The Retirement Income Review goes much further than an innocent-sounding 'fact base', and is sure to guide policies in the run up to the next election. It will change how we think about retirement incomes.

Graeme Shaw on why investing is at a pivotal moment

Company profits have not improved for many years but higher valuations have been driven by falling rates and excess liquidity. Conditions do not suit a value and contrarian manager but here are some opportunities.

Retirement Review gives strong views on hoarding of super

The Review includes some profound findings, most notable that retirement income should include drawing down far more capital. Expect post-retirement products to proliferate under a Retirement Income Covenant.

11 key findings on retirement dreams during the pandemic

A mid-pandemic survey of over 1,000 people near or in retirement found three in four are not confident how long their money will last. Only 18% felt their money was safe during a strong economic downturn.

Bank scorecard 2020: when will the mojo return?

Banks severely cut dividends in 2020 but are expected to improve payments in 2021. History provides clues to when the banks will return to their 2019 levels of profitability, but who is positioned the best?

Generational wealth transfers will affect all investors

It's not only that 60 is the new 40, but 80 is the new 60. Many Baby Boomers spend up in retirement and are less inclined to leave a nest egg to their children. The ways wealth transfers will affect all investors.

Latest Updates

Shares

Hamish Douglass on big tech and life after COVID

On the sidelines of the Morningstar Conference, the Magellan co-founder reflects on the pandemic and which sectors are set to gain and lose. He says we were lucky the pandemic hit when it did (videos and transcripts).

Superannuation

Cost of running an SMSF receives updated judgement

Administration costs can rise for complexity, especially owning property in an SMSF, but fees are highly competitive from a wide range of service providers. The break-even cost is less than previously reported.

SMSF strategies

Three areas SMSFs should consider outsourcing

SMSF trustees often cite ‘control of my investments’ as the number one motivation for setting up their own fund. But it still makes sense to outsource some parts of a well-diversified portfolio.

Retirement

Apparently, retirees should learn to SKI

The Retirement Income Review demonstrated limited understanding of the risks faced by self-funded retirees implementing rational human behaviour. Spending to qualify for the age pension is not a solution.

Retirement

7-point checklist for managing the uncertain timing of death

Average life expectancies are a weak predictor of individual outcomes, and it's better to consider a range of probable lifespans. A plan that lasts to the average will disappoint every second retiree.

Exchange traded products

'Quality' ETFs under the microscope

Interest in 'quality' factor ETFs has increased this year, helped by very attractive returns. However, not all ETFs are created alike and there are divergences in portfolio traits which investors can identify.

Shares

Is growth of zombie companies real or fiction?

Much has been written about the rise of 'zombie firms' which should have gone bankrupt, but new research should be comforting to economists and investors alike, with focus on a particular segment.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.