Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 302

SMSF trustees may lose insurance after super changes

The ‘Protecting Your Superannuation’ package, proposed in the 2018 Federal Budget, was passed earlier this year, and while the changes were designed to protect small superannuation balances, there may be significant implications for others. Many SMSF members, or others with large super balances, maintain smaller public offer accounts solely to access well-priced group life insurance. This legislation may place those life policies at risk unless members take action.

Super changes already legislated

The key changes in this legislation take effect from 1 July 2019, and are designed to limit the erosion of small balances in the following ways:

  • Fees will be limited to no more than 3% per annum for accounts with a balance of less than $6,000.
  • Exit fees on all super accounts will be banned to remove barriers to consolidation.
  • Insurance will be maintained on an opt-in basis for inactive accounts, defined as those that have not received a contribution in 16 months. Funds will be required to contact inactive members before 1 May 2019 to confirm whether they wish to maintain their existing cover.
  • Super trustees will also be required to transfer all inactive accounts with balances below $6,000 to the ATO, which will then strive to transfer these balances to the owner’s active superannuation account.

(Please note: The proposal to make insurance an ‘opt-in’ for those commencing a superannuation account under the age of 25, or with a balance of less than $6,000, was dropped from this legislation and will be proposed in a separate bill, which has not yet passed).

If you have been maintaining a small inactive superannuation fund for insurance purposes, it is likely this legislation will affect you. You may have your insurance policy cancelled, or, if your balance is below $6,000, your policy cancelled AND your balance transferred to the ATO. Neither of these outcomes is desirable if you are intentionally arranging insurance cover in an account separate from your existing active super balance.

Benefits of insurance through a large fund

If you have an inactive account, your superannuation fund should contact you soon requesting that you opt in to maintain your insurance cover. However you will need to ensure they have the correct mailing details etc in order to contact you. If you have not heard from your fund by 1 May, it is strongly advised that you contact them directly to confirm that you wish to maintain your cover, if you wish to do so.

The implications of having insurance cancelled can be significant. It is widely accepted that thousands of small superannuation accounts are maintained in the public system by SMSF trustees purely for insurance purposes.

Superannuation funds can hold life, total and permanent disablement and income protection policies on your behalf. Large funds are also generally able to access group policies that offer lower premiums than personal policies such as those you can access through an SMSF. Large super funds also often offer ‘automatic acceptance limits’, which allow you take out cover up to pre-specified limits without having to undergo personal underwriting, which may include medical tests and so on.

In the event your existing cover is cancelled, you may not be able to get new cover on the same terms. You may need to disclose medical conditions that have arisen since you originally applied, and have higher premiums or exclusions as a result, or you may no longer be eligible for cover at all through that fund. In many circumstances, particularly if you are older, or have poor health or a high-risk occupation, your existing policy may be the only insurance policy you hold. It may also be the only affordable insurance you are able to get.

Qualifying a fund as active

Insurance is critical if you have debt, dependents or rely on your income for your financial security. If that insurance is held in a super fund you’re not contributing to, you will need to consider whether to make the fund active, or at least ensure that the trustee of the fund knows you want it by opting in. Part of the new legislation lists actions that qualify a fund as active, which include making contributions, rolling funds into the account, changing investment options, making changes to your insurance or making a declaration to the ATO. If you’re not sure what you have, exactly, this could also present a great opportunity to review your insurance and ensure you have the cover you need.

 

Gemma Dale is Director of SMSF and Investor Behaviour at nabtrade, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. Any information in this publication is of a general nature only. It is not intended to be a substitute for specialised advice and nabtrade is not a registered tax agent.

For more articles and papers from nabtrade, please click here.

4 Comments

Craig

April 21, 2019

As someone who can no longer be underwritten for any new life insurance, I have three of these public offer funds specifically for the insurance, as well as an SMSF where most of the money sits.

I contacted each fund to confirm what they need to mainatain a ‘active’ status. The Mercer fund nominated a contribution each 16 months. The IOOF fund said as long as i enquired each 16 months i would be ok. The Plum fund is my current corporate plan so is active.

To keep things simple, and so I don’t need to remember to do anything further, I set up a regular $5 monthly contribution to the Mercer and IOOF funds. Job done.

There will definitely be people who lose critical insurance via these changes. I have not had any communication about these changes from any of the 3 funds that i hold. 1st May is 10 days away, and everyone is on holidays.

Yet another example of why it is necessary for people to engage wth their super.

BeenThereB4

April 21, 2019

Craig should review the wisdom of having cover with 3 funds. I read that if you have a claim you can only claim on one policy.

Can anybody support my contention ?

Dean

April 22, 2019

This is a common and unfortunate misperception.

Ultimately it depends on the specific rules of each fund and insurance product involved. So be sure to read the fine print and/or get proper advice for your specific situation. But generally speaking it is quite OK to claim on multiple policies. The main area of restriction is with income protection. The overriding rule is not being able to claim more than about 75% of pre illness income in total across multiple income protection policies.

Frank

April 17, 2019

Thanks for reminding me about this. It's why I keep my public fund.


 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Bulls, bonds and brain damage

Markets are overlooking the obvious risks as traders pass the parcel to the next buyer. Even central bankers believe: “There is something vaguely troubling when the unthinkable becomes routine.”

Three strategies for retirees to spend their super

Many retirees simply drawdown the minimum amount allowed under the pension rules. While their money may last longer than using other strategies, is a frugal lifestyle the best way to live in later years?

Elizabeth Bryan and Chris Cuffe on how good boards work

Two of Australia's most experienced and successful chairs explain what makes a good board, what to watch for in bad ones, with advice for aspiring board members: understand first what motivates you.

Don’t expect too much from the Retirement Income Review

Expectations are already high for what the Retirement Income Review will deliver, but it will make no formal recommendations, and the 'fact base' it establishes will be disputed by other experts.

Growth and urbanisation create compelling opportunities

The investment opportunity in listed ‘real assets’ in Australia is almost $250 billion. Offices, roads, warehouses, airports, pipelines and shops are the foundation of economic growth.

Long lease property funds: follow the income

Investors should not assume all property leases are the same, and long WALE funds have the advantages of tenant quality and term, plus look for the highly-desirable 'triple net leases'.

Latest Updates

Interviews

Elizabeth Bryan and Chris Cuffe on how good boards work

Two of Australia's most experienced and successful chairs explain what makes a good board, what to watch for in bad ones, with advice for aspiring board members: understand first what motivates you.

Shares

Bulls, bonds and brain damage

Markets are overlooking the obvious risks as traders pass the parcel to the next buyer. Even central bankers believe: “There is something vaguely troubling when the unthinkable becomes routine.”

Property

Long lease property funds: follow the income

Investors should not assume all property leases are the same, and long WALE funds have the advantages of tenant quality and term, plus look for the highly-desirable 'triple net leases'.

Infrastructure

Growth and urbanisation create compelling opportunities

The investment opportunity in listed ‘real assets’ in Australia is almost $250 billion. Offices, roads, warehouses, airports, pipelines and shops are the foundation of economic growth.

Retirement

Three strategies for retirees to spend their super

Many retirees simply drawdown the minimum amount allowed under the pension rules. While their money may last longer than using other strategies, is a frugal lifestyle the best way to live in later years?

Sponsors

Alliances

Special eBooks

Specially-selected collections of the best articles 

Read more

Earn CPD Hours

Accredited CPD hours reading Firstlinks

Read more

Pandora Archive

Firstlinks articles are collected in Pandora, Australia's national archive.

Read more