Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 149

SMSFs need care dealing with related parties

SMSFs are allowed to invest in and transact with related parties however there are rules that surround these arrangements and sometimes they can be confusing. This article is a guide to the main issues of asset purchases and sales, borrowing and lending and investing in related parties.

The golden rule is at arm’s length

The golden rule for all related party interactions is that whenever you are dealing with a related party of the fund, all transactions must be conducted on an arm’s-length basis. That is, transactions must be carried out on the same terms and conditions as if they were with an unrelated, third party.

A related party of a super fund is defined under superannuation law as a member of the fund, a standard employer-sponsor of the fund and a Part 8 associate of either of these two. A Part 8 associate generally includes:

  • relatives of the members
  • the other members and trustees (or trustee directors) of the fund
  • business partners in a partnership (and their spouses and children) and the partnership itself
  • a trust controlled by a member of the fund
  • a company sufficiently influenced, or for which majority voting interest is held by a member

A standard employer-sponsor of a fund is an employer that contributes to a super fund for its employees due to an arrangement between the employer and the fund. Typically, this would not be relevant for SMSFs that have been established in recent years.

It’s not always easy to determine whether another party or entity is related, and professional advice is frequently advisable.

Can an SMSF lend money to a related party?

There is a prohibition on lending or providing financial assistance to members of an SMSF or their relatives (as opposed to a related party – see definition above). For these purposes, a relative is a spouse, parent, grandparent, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, lineal descendant or adopted child of the individual or their spouse. It also includes the spouse of any of the above.

Financial assistance includes any kind of financial aid, help or benefit using resources of the SMSF (even where it wasn’t requested). For example, a gift, debt forgiveness or paying an inflated price for services.

Because this ban on lending only applies to the member and their relatives, an SMSF can therefore lend to a related party that is not a relative but only under very limited circumstances. Such a loan would be termed an in-house asset (IHA).

An IHA is a loan to, or investment in, a related party of the fund. While allowable, IHAs must not constitute more than 5% of the total market value of the SMSFs assets.

Can my SMSF invest in my private company?

Yes, but the value of the investment cannot exceed 5% of the market value of the SMSF’s total assets. This is because the private company would be considered a related party and any investment in it is then an IHA. If the 5% level is exceeded, the SMSF trustees will need to put a plan in place to reduce the level back under 5%. This can be problematic if the value of the private company’s shares increases significantly such that it constitutes a higher percentage of the fund’s overall assets.

Dividends from the private company must also be paid to the SMSF on an arm’s-length basis. If dividends are received by the SMSF on a non-arm’s-length basis, they will be taxed as special income at a rate of 45% (plus 2% temporary budget levy).

Can my fund borrow from a related party?

A general prohibition exists on any super fund borrowing or maintaining an existing borrowing of money. However, there are limited circumstances in which a fund can borrow including from a related party. Temporary borrowings are possible for benefit payments, settlement of transactions and payment of surcharge but super laws place stringent criteria around when and how these are permissible.

The other exception to borrowing is for limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBA). These can include borrowings for assets such as listed securities or real estate but recourse by the lender in the case of default can only be against the actual asset for which the borrowing is undertaken.  It is possible for related parties to lend to the SMSF under such arrangements, but there are specific rules that must be adhered to. Importantly, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) insists that borrowing arrangements involving a related party are undertaken strictly on commercial terms. This includes not only interest rates but other terms and conditions such as repayments and loan to value ratios.

Can an SMSF buy assets from a related party?

Generally, the answer is no but there are a few exceptions. An SMSF can purchase listed securities and business real property from a related party and certain ‘in-house assets’ (IHA) but remember, always at market value. Business real property refers to property that is used 100% for commercial purposes whether that is by a related party or not.

Can an SMSF sell assets to a related party?

An SMSF can sell its assets, at market value and on an arm’s-length basis, to a related party. The SMSF can also transfer an asset to a member of the fund as a lump-sum ‘in-specie’ member benefit payment where the member has satisfied the relevant criteria to start accessing their super benefits.

Where do trustees generally go wrong with related party investments and transactions?

Even where a particular transaction or asset acquisition is permissible, problems typically arise with trustees not dealing with related parties on an arm’s-length basis. SMSF trustees can be at risk of being ‘one-eyed’ when it comes to related party investments. They must be careful to ensure that investments are undertaken to maximise retirement savings and not using fund assets simply as a source of investment revenue for their personal businesses or for personal use.

An SMSF is a separate legal entity and trustees have an obligation to ensure that their dealings, including those with related parties, are conducted in the members’ best interests. Failure to do so is a failure to meet their fiduciary obligations as a trustee and can cause the fund to be scrutinised by the ATO, potentially incurring penalties.

If you are considering transactions between an SMSF and a related party, a professional adviser can help ensure you are operating within the bounds of the law.

 

Liz Westover is a Director with PricewaterhouseCoopers, Private Clients. This article is general information and does not address the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   31 March 2016
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

7 vital steps to compliance for your SMSF

Importance of updating your SMSF Trust Deed

SMSF estate planning: Eight things to consider

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.