Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 228

Your social media rights in a digital future

Two recent events give valuable insights into what is happening in technology, especially the risks and rewards of social media.

First, each year since 1959, the ABC has produced a series called the Boyer Lectures. In 2017, Professor Genevieve Bell’s series is called Fast, Smart and Connected: What is it to be Human, and Australian, in a Digital World? In particular, Episode 4 asks how Australia should build its digital future and “a world that is not about our worst impulses but our best”. Genevieve Bell pioneered futuristic research at Intel in Silicon Valley, and she focusses on the role of technology in our lives.

The second event is the recent release of simplified Terms and Conditions, based on those issued by social media giants, by the Children’s Commissioner for England (the ‘Commissioner’, established under the Children’s Act 2004).

Facebook has two billion users, but it’s doubtful whether more than a tiny minority has read the Terms and Conditions everyone agrees to. The T&Cs connect to another 10 documents on specific policies, with thousands of words of legal undertakings. Users give away the right to privacy and the ownership of material shared online, while agreeing that Facebook can make money from the content without paying the user.

It’s the same with all the social media giants. The Commissioner for England reports that in the UK, Instagram is used by 56% of 12- to 15-year-olds and an amazing 43% of 8- to 11-year-olds, and their T&Cs run to 17 pages and over 5,000 words. These children and their parents do not realise they are being tracked even when the app is not in use. They have given away their personal data including its commercialisation and even agreed that Instagram has the right to read direct messages. Snapchat can publicly display or sell any content put on Live Snapchat, including a person’s face or voice.

Simplifying the rules for all to understand

The Commissioner has issued simplified T&Cs and guides to give children, teachers and adults more power and information, aimed primarily at UK schools but available for all. She says of the social media giants, highlighting Facebook, YouTube, Snapchat, WhatsApp and Instagram:

“Their terms and conditions are impenetrable, even to most adults. Children have absolutely no idea that they are giving away the right to privacy or the ownership of their data or the material they post online.”

In January 2017, the Commissioner published a year-long study called ‘Growing Up Digital’ to help prepare children for their digital lives. She says the companies should be doing more to counter the negative social impact of cyber-bullying, grooming, control over content, the impact on mental health, the effect on body image, anxiety and depression.

In conjunction with Tes (a teacher's resource site which has an Australian section here) and legal firm Schillings, the Commissioner has produced teaching packs relevant to citizens around the world, including simplified T&Cs for five social media sites. The packs can be downloaded for free. Here is a short extract from the simplified version of Facebook’s rights.

Facebook’s rights

1. We use technology that can track information about you automatically as soon as you go onto Facebook.

2. Facebook can collect information about you, including:

  • Everything you tell us when you set up your account
  • The pages you view, how long you spend and who you talk to
  • What device you’re using, what browser and network, and your IP address
  • Details about what you post or ‘like’
  • Anything anyone else shares about you or tags you in
  • What and who is in your address book, if it’s synced to Facebook
  • Your card details, address and what you’ve bought, if you buy things on Facebook
  • Your battery and signal strength
  • Where you are
  • If you go onto another company’s website or app

3. We can use your name, profile pictures, information about what you ‘like’ and anything you post to make money and we don’t have to pay you for that.

4. Facebook owns other companies, including Instagram and WhatsApp who can share information about you with Facebook. If someone buys Facebook, the sale will include your information.

5. Facebook uses your information to suggest adverts, photos you should be tagged in, or places you should check in. We don’t have to make it obvious whether something is an advert or not.”

The Facebook terms and conditions have been edited for educational purposes and are not a replacement for the original version, which can be found at bit.ly/TCsFacebook.

What can be done?

Facebook acknowledges that its users also have rights, and these are outlined in the teaching packs. Probably most important is this interpretation:

“Some companies will share information about you with us and we will share information about you with them. We won’t share your name or email address, but we can share your age, location, gender and interests with advertisers all over the world, or people doing research. You have the right to tell us not to and we won’t.”

Therefore, users have the right to control and limit some of the details that Facebook may share.

I’m not an expert on Facebook, but in the top right of the home page, the Help Center is under the question mark, and it contains the tabs to set the privacy settings, including an advertising and preferences tool. It’s worth exploring your preferences.

It’s doubtful whether many people would freely give away their rights to privacy and ownership of their image and voice, and allow personal details to be shared with advertisers without making it obvious they are being marketed to. The Boyer Lectures give some warnings on where we are headed. People should consider what rights they are prepared to relinquish, especially when protecting vulnerable young people who do not know what is happening.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks. Other than on the Boyer Lectures, the material for this article is sourced primarily from the website of Children’s Commissioner for England, and this should be checked for more details and context to confirm the accuracy of this interpretation.

 

  •   23 November 2017
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Facebook, Google need new business model

Business model disruption has barely begun

Facebook: social network or pervasive global media giant?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.