Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 186

Super alternative overcomes access and investment limits

On 23 November 2016, the Government’s superannuation reforms announced in the 2016/2017 Budget finally passed the Parliament. The changes are designed to “improve the fairness, sustainability, flexibility and integrity of the superannuation system”, according to Treasury. The Government also intends to enshrine the objective of superannuation in legislation, “to provide income in retirement to substitute or supplement the Age Pension.”

How the new rules will lead to less in super

Without debating the merits of the changes, the new regulations target wealthier Australians who use the upper limits of the contribution caps to place large amounts in the tax-advantaged system. The argument is that well-off Australians are exploiting generous tax breaks in super to accumulate more wealth than they need for retirement, often with a view to transferring it to the next generation.

The major changes that will reduce super balances when implemented from 1 July 2017, are:

  • The $1.6 million cap on the amount of super which can be transferred into a tax-free retirement account (previously no limit)
  • The annual concessional (before tax) contribution limits of $25,000 (previously up to $35,000)
  • The annual non-concessional contribution cap of $100,000 (previously $180,000)
  • The threshold where an extra 15% tax (total of 30%) is paid on concessional contributions applies to anyone earning $250,000 or more of ‘income for surcharge purposes’ (previously $300,000).

Potential for further changes

The Labor Party has other versions of how superannuation and contributions should be legislated, called its ‘Fairer Super Plan’. Criticism from politicians and social equity groups such as ACOSS on the ongoing generosity of super will continue. The most commonly used table from the Murray Report (below), shows that about 38% of the tax advantages of super go to the top 10% of income earners. This will change under the new rules but not significantly for a long time.

Share of total superannuation tax concessions by decile

Source: Financial System Inquiry, Final Report, page 138

Investors seeking certainty and flexibility in a tax-effective environment will increasingly consider alternatives outside of super. There are various options which may assist in minimising or deferring tax, including creating a private company to hold investments, or forming a family trust, but for high income earners, one of the more tax-effective, flexible and cost-effective options may be an investment bond.

Tax and flexibility of an investment bond

Investment bonds are technically life-insurance policies with a nominated life insured, and a beneficiary. In investment terms, they operate like a tax-paid managed fund. Investors choose from a range of investment options, depending on their goals. These range from growth portfolios (higher risk) which typically include more equities, to defensive portfolios (lower risk) which usually invest in cash and fixed interest.

An investment bond is tax-paid, because the earnings from the underlying investment portfolio are taxed at the company rate of 30% within the bond structure. Investors do not receive distributions as they are re-invested, and do not therefore need to declare the earnings from the bond in their personal tax returns. In the case of investment portfolios which contain equities, the tax rate may be further reduced by franking credits.

If an individual’s personal taxable income is at least $37,001 p.a. the tax paid on any additional personal income will be greater than on investment bond earnings rate. At this threshold, the marginal tax rate increases from 21% to 34.5%, higher than the 30% on investment bonds.

There is no limit to the amount which can be placed in an investment bond in the first year, and additional contributions can be made each year, at up to 125% of the previous year’s contribution.

Funds can be withdrawn at any time, however, if they are left in the investment bond structure for 10 years, the entire proceeds of the bond (original investment, additional contributions and earnings) are tax paid. The investor does not need to include them in their tax return, and they can be distributed as a lump sum, or as a tax-paid income over time. And because an investment bond is in fact an insurance policy, with a life insured (this can be the same person as the bond owner), on the death of the life insured, the beneficiary of the bond will receive all proceeds of the bond tax free, regardless of how long the bond has been held.

The proceeds fall outside of the bond owner’s estate, and pass directly to the beneficiary. This makes investment bonds ideal estate planning tools, or an effective way to transfer wealth from one generation to another.

Super remains the most tax-effective long-term investment structure for most Australians, but access to super money is restricted until a ‘condition of release’ is met. This generally means the investor can’t withdraw the money until they have reached a ‘preservation age’ and retired. Preservation age is 55 for an investor born before 1 July 1960 but increases up to age 60 for those born after this date. Earlier access may be allowed in exceptional circumstances, such as permanent disability.

Saving for education or estate planning purposes

By contrast, investment bonds can be used as savings for children or family members to fund education expenses or the cost of raising a child, and are often used by grandparents to finance the future needs of their grandchildren. The bonds bring simplicity in managing the tax that applies to a child’s income, and may be assigned to a child in the future (subject to parental or guardian consent) without tax or legal complications. The child has the option to continue holding the investment bond without affecting the original 10-year tax period start date.

An investment bond’s life insurance component enables tax-effective estate planning and simple wealth transfers external to a will. It gives the life insured significant flexibility and control in determining beneficiaries of any ‘death maturity’ payments.

In superannuation, death benefit tax concessions apply only to dependents of the life insured. However, an investment bond’s death benefits can be directed tax-free to any nominated beneficiary, including adult family members, or the estate. How long the bond has been held does not impact the tax-free status. This flexibility may reduce the risk of disputes over estates and enable benefits to be paid more quickly.

 

Neil Rogan is General Manager of Centuria Life’s Investment Bond Division. Suitability of investment bonds will depend on a person’s circumstances, financial objectives and needs, none of which have been taken into consideration in this article, and potential investors should seek financial advice.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Take care when assisting parents financially

How to avoid inheritance fights

Death benefits from super don't need to be this complicated

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.