Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 254

A super new opportunity for EOFY 2018

In the excitement of the introduction of sweeping superannuation changes on 1 July 2017, a new superannuation contribution opportunity may have gone unnoticed by many people. From that date, anyone eligible to make personal super contributions can claim that contribution as a personal tax deduction, regardless of their work status. This change is a result of the removal of the ‘10% test’ which generally meant you had to be self-employed or have no employment income in order to claim a deduction for your super contributions.

This is the first financial year that most people – including those who work for an employer - can use this strategy, even if you are already making salary sacrifice contributions. It’s an opportunity to make lump sum or regular contributions up to 30 June to maximise use of the $25,000 concessional contribution cap and potentially reduce your personal tax liability.

There are a few things to consider:

  • you can only contribute to superannuation if you are under age 65, or if you are between 65 and 75 years of age and meet the work test (which constitutes 40 hours of gainful employment during a 30 day period),
  • any contributions for which you claim a personal deduction will count toward your $25,000 concessional contribution cap (which also includes your Superannuation Guarantee and any other employer contributions you receive), and
  • if you are earning over $250,000 p.a, your contribution may be taxed at up to 30% due to the application of Division 293 tax (an extra 15% on top of the general 15% contributions tax).

Process for making tax deductible contributions

Firstly, you will need to make your super contributions before 30 June 2018 if you want to ensure they are counted towards the 2017/18 contribution cap. As a general guide, a super contribution is made when it is received by the super fund. For example, you are contributing electronically via BPAY, the contribution is deemed to have been made when the funds are credited to the super account, not the day you make the BPAY transaction. Individual super funds will also have specific requirements and deadlines towards the end of the financial year which they will usually publish on their websites. If you have an SMSF, you should consider timing your transfer to ensure it will be received in your account by 30 June (and note, 30 June 2018 is a Saturday).

Notice of Intent form

You will need to lodge a ‘Notice of Intent’ form with your super fund by the earlier of:

  • the date your tax return is lodged for the year the contribution was made, or
  • the end of the financial year following the financial year in which the contribution was made.

Your fund cannot accept a Notice of Intent if:

  • you have exited the fund (e.g. rolled over your funds to another super fund, or withdrawn them), or
  • the contribution(s) being claimed have been paid out as a lump sum or used to start a pension, or
  • you have submitted a spouse contributions-splitting application (that hasn’t been rejected by the fund).

This Notice of Intent is critical to ensuring you can claim a deduction for your contribution, so if you have any questions about how it operates, contact your super fund or your financial adviser.

Claiming a deduction for personal contributions to super may not be for everyone, and it’s worth noting that salary sacrifice may still be a more attractive strategy. The good news is that you can make a contribution under these rules at any time up to 30 June, but get it in on time.

 

Gemma Dale is Director, SMSF & Investor Behaviour at nabtrade, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on any this information, we recommend that you consider whether it is appropriate for your circumstances.

 

  •   17 May 2018
  • 10
  •      
  •   
10 Comments
Rob
May 17, 2018

"Your fund cannot accept a Notice of Intent if..........you have submitted a spouse contributions-splitting application (that hasn’t been rejected by the fund)".

Can you please clarify this for me?

Are you saying a member cannot make a personal CC in the same year (say FY18) as they have also received a spouse contributions splitting application? Why is that?

Gemma Dale
May 18, 2018

Hi Rob,

Just to clarify, if you're intending to claim a deduction for a contribution, and subsequently split it to your spouse, you'll need to submit the s290 notice first, to ensure the fund is aware of that this is a concessional contribution.

The receiving spouse can claim a deduction for personal contributions they make (subject to the other requirements), but not for the split amount.

Hope that helps.

Frankie
May 17, 2018

Thanks, glad you highlighted this, I'd been thinking how few people talk about simply putting $25,000 into super (or after SG) and receiving a tax deduction.

John
May 17, 2018

My SMSF administrator provides online templates for notification of contributions and to commence a pension. The reference to 'Notice of Intent' made me wonder whether these templates are sufficient to ensure deductibility of a personal concessional contribution.

Q: Is there a mandated template/format for the 'Notice of Intent'?

Matthew
May 17, 2018

Hi John,

You can use the ATO's version, that way you can't go wrong.

https://www.ato.gov.au/uploadedFiles/Content/SPR/downloads/n71121-11-2014_js33406_w.pdf

Regards,

Matthew.

Rob
May 17, 2018

No. There is a specific ATO form, or a simple letter including all the same details as the ATO form, will suffice.

Matthew
May 17, 2018

Hi Gemma,

Can you elaborate on the when salary sacrifice might still be a better option than making a personal contribution?

Thanks.

Gemma Dale
May 18, 2018

Hi Matthew,

It often depends on the salary sacrifice arrangements available to you. At this time of year, the fact that salary sacrifice must be prospective (ie in advance) means you can't contribute a great deal unless you're expecting a bonus or similar before 30 June.

For future years though, some employers offer quite attractive matching arrangements with their salary sacrifice packages (eg an extra 3% for each 3% that you contribute), which would make that arrangement preferable to simply contributing in your own name.

The discipline of salary sacrifice is also really useful for a lot of people - it's a good form of the 'pay yourself first' concept, and you get an immediate deduction, rather than having to wait until your tax return has been submitted and any refund has been processed, which could be more than 12 months after you made a personal contribution. Also you don't need to worry about the intricacies of s290 notices!

Gen Y
May 18, 2018

Yes, I'd like to know the same. Other than benefitting from dollar cost averaging I can't see any difference?

bojackhors3
May 22, 2018

Assuming you are making a personal contribution around EOFY so you aren't waiting a long time to get your tax back - the salary sacrificer has enjoyed up to 12months of performance returns on salary sacrificed contributions. Surely a better strategy for growing your returns.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Super contribution splitting

Super timing guide for contributions and reversionary pensions

9 strategies to make the most of EOFY 2018

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation’s structural failings

Politicians are fighting over access to super, but they may be arguing about the wrong thing. The system’s three fundamental flaws have been hiding in plain sight for decades, costing Australians far more than they realise.

Planning

The great wealth transfer myth

Why do some families preserve wealth for generations while others struggle to? As the great wealth transfer unfolds, the determining factor is often not the structure of the estate, but the preparation of those who will inherit it.

Investment strategies

What comes after bank hybrids?

For years, bank hybrids have been a cornerstone of portfolio income. With tens of billions of dollars now disappearing from the market, investors face a critical question: what comes next, and are the obvious replacements enough?

Investment insights from the US

What happens when knowledge becomes a commodity? The latest themes emerging from the US tech sector suggest AI could reshape company moats, disrupt incumbents and create winners and losers in unexpected places.

Investing

Can Berkshire thrive without Buffett?

Warren Buffett's departure marks the end of an era. But the more important question for investors is whether Berkshire's culture, discipline and capital allocation framework can survive without the man who built them.

Retirement

The Bengen 4% Rule: Lost in translation

For years, retirees have been told to focus on withdrawal rates. But the real question is far simpler: how many dollars can you safely spend? The answer may be very different from what conventional retirement wisdom suggests.

Interest rates

Super low interest rates came with side effects

For more than a decade, investors lived through an era of near-zero interest rates. With bond yields now surging, it's worth asking whether cheap money solved economic problems, or introduced a much larger set of risks.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.