Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 277

Sustainable investing focuses on the future

In the rapidly-evolving world of socially-conscious investing, sustainability has arrived. The integration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into fund managers’ fundamental research processes has become mainstream in recent years. However, sustainable investing takes that approach one step further by also considering the impact a company has on society.

Sustainability is gaining traction with investors, but it is not without challenges. Typically, socially-conscious strategies have focused on negative filters, without taking into consideration the positive contribution a company might have on society. Investment returns can be compromised due to constraining the investment universe and data. Each companies’ ESG performance can be of variable quality, resulting in many arguable or 'grey' areas.

The rise of sustainable investing

Research conducted by Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA) in 2017 shows that nine-in-10 Australians think that sustainable investing is important. Furthermore, 63% of Australians expect their advisers to incorporate their values and the societal or environmental implications of investments. Millennials are leading the charge. One key attribute of Millennials, now aged in their 20s and 30s, is their stated desire to live lives consistent with the values they espouse. About 84% of them say they want to invest in a socially-responsible way and their influence will grow as they become older and richer.

International organisations such as the United Nations and European Union are encouraging corporates to generate company profits in a positive and sustainable manner. Many of the world’s leading companies now consider sustainability in their corporate strategies, including Coca-Cola, Apple, BMW, Adidas, and H&M.

The United Nations has developed its Sustainable Development Goals Agenda (SDGs), a set of goals which, if achieved, would ‘end poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity for all’ by 2030. Broad and ambitious in scope, the SDG Agenda addresses the three dimensions of sustainable development: social, economic and environmental, as well as important aspects related to peace, justice and effective institutions. These goals are shown below.

Assessing the extent to which a company’s operations and products support the SDG agenda is an appealing way to address broader sustainability.

The investment manager as advocate

The investment industry is also evolving and, in some areas, driving the change. Simply having a ‘clean hands’ approach is no longer good enough. Many existing socially-conscious funds purely screen and exclude whole industries on the basis that they have a negative impact on society. This approach strictly reinforces a company’s adherence to ESG principles but fails to consider whether a company is contributing positively to society.

We believe investment managers should also be playing an ‘advocacy’ role, by putting pressure on individual companies to improve their ESG performance. In turn this operational improvement can lead to improved financial outcomes, along with the broader positive impact to society.

The dilemma for investment managers has been their fiduciary responsibility: their primary goal is generally to maximise returns for a targeted level of risk. In the past it has usually been assumed that pursuing both social good and profits would damage investment outcomes, as screening out potential investments or pursuing goals other than profit maximisation might result in the missing of opportunities. These are legitimate concerns and have often resulted in an unwillingness to commit to socially conscious investing.

However, investing sustainably doesn’t necessarily mean sacrificing potential returns.

Investing for good and for returns

The most common objection to investing with a social conscience is that an investor needs to sacrifice returns to invest for the greater good. An increasing body of evidence is beginning to challenge this view, and the outcomes achieved by some such funds suggest it is possible to have both. Industry research summarised by Willis Towers Watson in their paper ‘Show me the evidenceconfirms better ESG scoring-companies tend to provide moderately better risk-adjusted returns over the long term. From the evidence collected to date, Governance (‘G’) and company engagement have proven to lead to a positive impact on returns.

A commonality across the research points to a heightened quality factor via a lower cost of capital which in turn leads better stock performance. Published University of Oxford research by Clark, Feiner and Viehs (2014) on over 190 sources showed 90% of the studies on the cost of capital demonstrate that sound sustainability standards lower the cost of capital for companies. 88% of that research showed solid ESG practices result in better operational performance of firms.

Alphinity agrees with Willis Towers Watson’s conclusion:

“Astute long-term investors understand that ESG factors are not necessarily non-financially related factors, as is often perceived, but rather an additional source of insight into the risk and return profile of that investment.”

Selecting better scoring ESG companies is likely to become another pillar of active management, along with conviction, skill and a disciplined consistent approach.


Stephane Andre and Bruce Smith are Principals and Portfolio Managers at Alphinity Investment Management, a boutique fund manager in alliance with Fidante Partners, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

For more articles and papers from Fidante, please click here.


Bruce Smith
October 25, 2018

Hi Ashley, thanks for your comment. Our message from this article is that people are increasingly looking for funds that consider more than just returns, but that you don't necessarily have to get lower returns when you do that.

In reality, no decisions are ever made purely on the basis of ESG, it is one of many things we look at when investing in a company. In the end portfolio returns are a function of the stocks in the portfolio and the weighting of those stocks. The fact that there are 12 ESG-focused equity funds in the latest Mercer table and the range of those funds' performance over the year to August is as low as 10.5% and as high as 24% (8% pa to 14%+ pa over three years) suggests to us that the robustness of a manager's investment process and its skill in selecting stocks is going to be a more important determinant of returns than ESG considerations alone. We've found that a "bad" company is not necessarily a bad investment, and a "good" company necessarily a good investment. But we have also found that taking ESG into account can alert you to risks and, in some cases, help you to identify opportunities.

ESG is one of the positive screens we employ, the other is the extent to which a company addresses Sustainable Development. But the final decision to invest requires the company itself to be a good investment according to our investment process, undervalued companies in an earnings upgrade cycle, which has delivered good alpha over the almost 15 years we've been applying it.

October 25, 2018

I want to see returns measured to the last basis point on specific investment decisions based on concrete ESG rules. That way investors can make informed decisions about the trade-offs. On the other hand If ESG actually improves returns – then you should shout from the rooftops – with specific details on each ESG decision so people can test.


Leave a Comment:



Investment learnings from the COVID-19 crisis

Is it time for a social impact credit system?

Investors expect ESG issues to drive returns


Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Latest Updates


10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?


Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?


D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.


Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.


Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.