Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 277

Sustainable investing focuses on the future

In the rapidly-evolving world of socially-conscious investing, sustainability has arrived. The integration of environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into fund managers’ fundamental research processes has become mainstream in recent years. However, sustainable investing takes that approach one step further by also considering the impact a company has on society.

Sustainability is gaining traction with investors, but it is not without challenges. Typically, socially-conscious strategies have focused on negative filters, without taking into consideration the positive contribution a company might have on society. Investment returns can be compromised due to constraining the investment universe and data. Each companies’ ESG performance can be of variable quality, resulting in many arguable or 'grey' areas.

The rise of sustainable investing

Research conducted by Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA) in 2017 shows that nine-in-10 Australians think that sustainable investing is important. Furthermore, 63% of Australians expect their advisers to incorporate their values and the societal or environmental implications of investments. Millennials are leading the charge. One key attribute of Millennials, now aged in their 20s and 30s, is their stated desire to live lives consistent with the values they espouse. About 84% of them say they want to invest in a socially-responsible way and their influence will grow as they become older and richer.

International organisations such as the United Nations and European Union are encouraging corporates to generate company profits in a positive and sustainable manner. Many of the world’s leading companies now consider sustainability in their corporate strategies, including Coca-Cola, Apple, BMW, Adidas, and H&M.

The United Nations has developed its Sustainable Development Goals Agenda (SDGs), a set of goals which, if achieved, would ‘end poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity for all’ by 2030. Broad and ambitious in scope, the SDG Agenda addresses the three dimensions of sustainable development: social, economic and environmental, as well as important aspects related to peace, justice and effective institutions. These goals are shown below.

Assessing the extent to which a company’s operations and products support the SDG agenda is an appealing way to address broader sustainability.

The investment manager as advocate

The investment industry is also evolving and, in some areas, driving the change. Simply having a ‘clean hands’ approach is no longer good enough. Many existing socially-conscious funds purely screen and exclude whole industries on the basis that they have a negative impact on society. This approach strictly reinforces a company’s adherence to ESG principles but fails to consider whether a company is contributing positively to society.

We believe investment managers should also be playing an ‘advocacy’ role, by putting pressure on individual companies to improve their ESG performance. In turn this operational improvement can lead to improved financial outcomes, along with the broader positive impact to society.

The dilemma for investment managers has been their fiduciary responsibility: their primary goal is generally to maximise returns for a targeted level of risk. In the past it has usually been assumed that pursuing both social good and profits would damage investment outcomes, as screening out potential investments or pursuing goals other than profit maximisation might result in the missing of opportunities. These are legitimate concerns and have often resulted in an unwillingness to commit to socially conscious investing.

However, investing sustainably doesn’t necessarily mean sacrificing potential returns.

Investing for good and for returns

The most common objection to investing with a social conscience is that an investor needs to sacrifice returns to invest for the greater good. An increasing body of evidence is beginning to challenge this view, and the outcomes achieved by some such funds suggest it is possible to have both. Industry research summarised by Willis Towers Watson in their paper ‘Show me the evidenceconfirms better ESG scoring-companies tend to provide moderately better risk-adjusted returns over the long term. From the evidence collected to date, Governance (‘G’) and company engagement have proven to lead to a positive impact on returns.

A commonality across the research points to a heightened quality factor via a lower cost of capital which in turn leads better stock performance. Published University of Oxford research by Clark, Feiner and Viehs (2014) on over 190 sources showed 90% of the studies on the cost of capital demonstrate that sound sustainability standards lower the cost of capital for companies. 88% of that research showed solid ESG practices result in better operational performance of firms.

Alphinity agrees with Willis Towers Watson’s conclusion:

“Astute long-term investors understand that ESG factors are not necessarily non-financially related factors, as is often perceived, but rather an additional source of insight into the risk and return profile of that investment.”

Selecting better scoring ESG companies is likely to become another pillar of active management, along with conviction, skill and a disciplined consistent approach.


Stephane Andre and Bruce Smith are Principals and Portfolio Managers at Alphinity Investment Management, a boutique fund manager in alliance with Fidante Partners, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

For more articles and papers from Fidante, please click here.


Bruce Smith
October 25, 2018

Hi Ashley, thanks for your comment. Our message from this article is that people are increasingly looking for funds that consider more than just returns, but that you don't necessarily have to get lower returns when you do that.

In reality, no decisions are ever made purely on the basis of ESG, it is one of many things we look at when investing in a company. In the end portfolio returns are a function of the stocks in the portfolio and the weighting of those stocks. The fact that there are 12 ESG-focused equity funds in the latest Mercer table and the range of those funds' performance over the year to August is as low as 10.5% and as high as 24% (8% pa to 14%+ pa over three years) suggests to us that the robustness of a manager's investment process and its skill in selecting stocks is going to be a more important determinant of returns than ESG considerations alone. We've found that a "bad" company is not necessarily a bad investment, and a "good" company necessarily a good investment. But we have also found that taking ESG into account can alert you to risks and, in some cases, help you to identify opportunities.

ESG is one of the positive screens we employ, the other is the extent to which a company addresses Sustainable Development. But the final decision to invest requires the company itself to be a good investment according to our investment process, undervalued companies in an earnings upgrade cycle, which has delivered good alpha over the almost 15 years we've been applying it.

October 25, 2018

I want to see returns measured to the last basis point on specific investment decisions based on concrete ESG rules. That way investors can make informed decisions about the trade-offs. On the other hand If ESG actually improves returns – then you should shout from the rooftops – with specific details on each ESG decision so people can test.


Leave a Comment:



Beyond the acronym, navigating important ESG choices

Mike Murray on watching for the changing narrative

10 lessons from Larry Fink's 2022 Outlook


Most viewed in recent weeks

How to enjoy your retirement

Amid thousands of comments, tips include developing interests to keep occupied, planning in advance to have enough money, staying connected with friends and communities ... should you defer retirement or just do it?

Results from our retirement experiences survey

Retirement is a good experience if you plan for it and manage your time, but freedom from money worries is key. Many retirees enjoy managing their money but SMSFs are not for everyone. Each retirement is different.

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Fear is good if you are not part of the herd

If you feel fear when the market loses its head, you become part of the herd. Develop habits to embrace the fear. Identify the cause, decide if you need to take action and own the result without looking back. 

Latest Updates


The paradox of investment cycles

Now we're captivated by inflation and higher rates but only a year ago, investors were certain of the supremacy of US companies, the benign nature of inflation and the remoteness of tighter monetary policy.


Reporting Season will show cost control and pricing power

Companies have been slow to update guidance and we have yet to see the impact of inflation expectations in earnings and outlooks. Companies need to insulate costs from inflation while enjoying an uptick in revenue.


The early signals for August company earnings

Weaker share prices may have already discounted some bad news, but cost inflation is creating wide divergences inside and across sectors. Early results show some companies are strong enough to resist sector falls.


The compelling 20-year flight of SYD into private hands

In 2002, the share price of the company that became Sydney Airport (SYD) hit 80 cents from the $2 IPO price. After 20 years of astute investment driving revenue increases, it sold to private hands for $8.75 in 2022.

Investment strategies

Ethical investing responding to some short-term challenges

There are significant differences in the sector weightings of an ethical fund versus an index, and while this has caused some short-term headwinds recently, the tailwinds are expected to blow over the long term.

Investment strategies

If you are new to investing, avoid these 10 common mistakes

Many new investors make common mistakes while learning about markets. Losses are inevitable. Newbies should read more and develop a long-term focus while avoiding big mistakes and not aiming to be brilliant.

Investment strategies

RMBS today: rising rate-linked income with capital preservation

Lenders use Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities to finance mortgages and RMBS are available to retail investors through fund structures. They come with many layers of protection beyond movements in house prices. 



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.