Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 159

What tax deductions are available to property investors?

When looking to purchase an investment property, there are many important questions. While most investors consider location, purchase price and tenanting ability, depreciation is often overlooked. Depreciation can help unlock the cash flow potential within an investment property, often resulting in thousands of additional dollars for the investor each financial year.

What is depreciation?

As a building gets older, items wear out – they depreciate. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) allows property owners to claim this depreciation as a tax deduction. Depreciation can be claimed by any property owner who obtains income from their property.

Claiming building structure as a deduction

Capital works allowance deductions are based on the historical cost of the building excluding the cost of all ‘plant’ and non-eligible items. As a general rule, residential buildings which commenced construction after 15 September 1987 and commercial properties which commenced construction after 20 July 1982 are eligible for the capital works allowance.

Although these restrictions apply, often older properties have undergone renovations. Renovations completed within the legislated dates can also entitle the owner of the investment property to deductions, even if the deductions were completed by a previous owner of the property.

Common depreciable items in an investment property

Plant and equipment items, commonly known as removable assets, are also eligible for depreciation deductions. Each plant and equipment item has an effective life set by the ATO. The depreciation deduction available on each item is calculated using the effective life. Some plant and equipment depreciable items commonly found within a property include:

  • Hot water systems
  • Ceiling fans
  • Dishwashers
  • Carpets
  • Blinds and curtains
  • Exhaust fans
  • Light shades

  • Ovens
  • Furniture
  • Range hoods
  • Smoke alarms
  • Garbage bins
  • Cook tops
  • Door closer

Case study

Amy purchased a nine-year-old three-bedroom house for $610,000 one year ago. Prior to making her depreciation claim, Amy’s investment property was earning a rental income of $495 per week or a total income of $25,740 per annum, while her yearly expenses (including loan interest) totalled $41,028. Towards the end of her first year owning the property, Amy’s annual after-tax outlay amounted to $9,631 or $185 per week, based on her 37% marginal tax rate. Of course, the reductions in taxable income are even more valuable to people in a higher tax bracket.

A thorough site inspection led to a detailed tax depreciation schedule showing the deductions available for her property for the next 40 years, including $9,585 in the first year. The following table provides a summary of Amy’s scenario for the first full year, both before and after depreciation was claimed.

Property_610k

Property_610k

The depreciation deductions in this case study were calculated using the diminishing value method of depreciation. The BMT Tax Depreciation Schedule reduced Amy’s annual outlay for the property to $6,085 per annum or $117 per week, a difference of $68 per week or $3,536 per year.

To claim depreciation, investors should obtain a comprehensive tax depreciation schedule from a Quantity Surveyor. They are qualified under the tax ruling 97/25 to estimate construction costs for depreciation purposes and are one of a few select professionals who specialise in providing depreciation schedules. They are affiliated with industry-regulating bodies and gain access to the latest information and resources through their accreditations.

Claiming depreciation during renovation

Existing assets within a property can be worth thousands of dollars. When old assets (like carpet or hot water systems) are replaced during a renovation, the owners may be entitled to claim any residual depreciation as a tax deduction. Property owners should consider a pre-renovation depreciation schedule if they are considering making any renovations to an investment property. They should also update an existing tax depreciation schedule after work is completed to ensure they capture deductions for any new items added to the property during the renovation.

 

Bradley Beer (B. Con. Mgt, AAIQS, MRICS) is the Chief Executive Officer of BMT Tax Depreciation, a leading provider of tax depreciation schedules for investors. This article is general information and individuals should seek their own tax advice.

RELATED ARTICLES

EOFY and new depreciation rules for property

Tax deductions are still available for property investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.