Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 17

Taxing as revenue or capital gains and why it matters

Investors are often confused about the difference between a revenue profit and a capital gain. People are even more confused by whether a loss is a revenue loss or a capital loss and are frequently bamboozled as to which type of loss can be applied against which gain.

Does it matter?

Characterisation as revenue or capital

By way of illustration, assume an investor, in addition to their salary, has gross gains from sale of shares of $10,000, an equivalent loss from sale of shares and also a $10,000 loss from a negatively geared rental property. All equities have been held for longer than 12 months and the investor is not a share trader.

There are three fundamental questions to answer:

  • is the gain a revenue profit or a capital gain?
  • are the losses revenue losses or capital losses?
  • are there any restrictions in applying the losses against income or gains?

Characterisation of a gain or loss as revenue or capital is a matter of fact and circumstance having regard to many matters such as whether the investor is an individual or other legal entity, the investor’s intention and the nature of the activity undertaken.

In forming a view, the ATO will have regard to various factors including the dollar value of the portfolio, the type of securities, the frequency and dollar value of turnover, the average holding period and whether or not the investor has what the ATO would regard as a sophisticated trading strategy or methodology. Weighing these up, the ATO may reach a conclusion that the securities are held as revenue assets.

In contrast, a passive holding where equities are bought and sold infrequently is more likely to be regarded as capital. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules as to what constitutes frequent activity.

Just to confuse matters, it is possible for an investor to designate one parcel of shares as a trading (revenue) portfolio and another as capital. Provided this is carefully documented and shares do not ‘drift’ from one parcel to another, the distinction can be made. Experience shows that the loss- making investments tend to drift towards the trading portfolio and the gains towards the capital portfolio – all too often after the event. This approach seldom survives close scrutiny by the ATO.

Rules of thumb

Given all of this, are there any rules of thumb? Whilst there are many exceptions the following could be adopted as guidelines:

  • where a person holds an investment for longer than 12 months, any gain should be regarded as capital (but not always)
  • likewise, any loss on sale of such an asset would be regarded as a capital loss
  • a loss where expenses exceed income (such as a negatively geared rental property) is a revenue loss
  • regular, high volume trading will be viewed as revenue gains and losses.

Moving to the loss rules, the following matters should be noted:

  • revenue losses can be applied against either income or capital gains
  • capital losses can only be applied against capital gains, not against income
  • one dollar of capital loss offsets one dollar of gross capital gain
  • one dollar of revenue loss offsets two dollars of gross long-term capital gain. That is, if the gain relates to an asset which a person has held for longer than 12 months, the 50% CGT discount applies to reduce the taxable amount to half of the gross gain. The revenue loss is then applied against this reduced amount.

The worked example

Where do these rules take us in the above example? The investor would offset the capital loss on shares dollar for dollar against the capital gain. The rental loss could be offset against salary.

If we change the example and assume the investor had no capital losses, they could apply the rental loss, either in full against their salary or part against the ‘after 50% discount’ gain of $5,000 and the remaining $5,000 against salary. The tax outcome would be the same in either case.

As an alternative, they might consider crystallising capital losses by selling shares with otherwise unrealised losses. Care would need to be taken with such a strategy as it may be viewed unfavourably by the ATO, particularly if the investor sold the investments prior to 30 June and bought back the same investments shortly after year-end.

As 30 June approaches, investors should take the time to review their portfolios and also the position they are taking in respect of tax treatment.

 

Ray Cummings is Principal of Greenoak Advisory Pty Ltd, and for 15 years was a Tax Partner at Pitcher Partners.

 

  •   30 May 2013
  • 3
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

Tax deductibility of financial advice improves affordability

Investment bonds for intergenerational wealth transfer

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Latest from Morningstar

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Economy

Was life really better in the good old days?

Are we worse off than previous generations? Lately, there seems to be a heightened level of angst that economic conditions are getting harder and that the two-party political system (and maybe democracy too) is failing voters.

Retirement

Australia has saved $4.5 trillion for retirement. Here's what matters more

Most Australians approaching retirement can tell you the exact dollar value of their super account. But success depends on more than a sizeable balance. Here's four key questions to ask yourself at the start of the financial year. 

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

AI is already reshaping the economy, but companies building transformative technologies rarely capture the greatest long-term value. Instead, those benefits accrue to the users. We may well see this pattern reproduced. 

Taxation

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

The 'cost base reset' for the new super tax is being sold as protection for pre-July gains. A worked example shows $1M of protection is worth about $25,000, and the real deadline has not passed.

Latest from Morningstar

The forecasting fix that Wall Street missed

Asking whether markets are overpriced may be the wrong question. New research suggests that traditional valuation metrics used to forecast returns may have been misread. Here are five takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Should a fund manager invest their own money differently?

Investors often like the idea that fund managers should invest client money exactly as they invest their own. But reality is more complicated. Unique circumstances make a different approach rational and, at times, beneficial.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.