Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 17

Taxing as revenue or capital gains and why it matters

Investors are often confused about the difference between a revenue profit and a capital gain. People are even more confused by whether a loss is a revenue loss or a capital loss and are frequently bamboozled as to which type of loss can be applied against which gain.

Does it matter?

Characterisation as revenue or capital

By way of illustration, assume an investor, in addition to their salary, has gross gains from sale of shares of $10,000, an equivalent loss from sale of shares and also a $10,000 loss from a negatively geared rental property. All equities have been held for longer than 12 months and the investor is not a share trader.

There are three fundamental questions to answer:

  • is the gain a revenue profit or a capital gain?
  • are the losses revenue losses or capital losses?
  • are there any restrictions in applying the losses against income or gains?

Characterisation of a gain or loss as revenue or capital is a matter of fact and circumstance having regard to many matters such as whether the investor is an individual or other legal entity, the investor’s intention and the nature of the activity undertaken.

In forming a view, the ATO will have regard to various factors including the dollar value of the portfolio, the type of securities, the frequency and dollar value of turnover, the average holding period and whether or not the investor has what the ATO would regard as a sophisticated trading strategy or methodology. Weighing these up, the ATO may reach a conclusion that the securities are held as revenue assets.

In contrast, a passive holding where equities are bought and sold infrequently is more likely to be regarded as capital. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules as to what constitutes frequent activity.

Just to confuse matters, it is possible for an investor to designate one parcel of shares as a trading (revenue) portfolio and another as capital. Provided this is carefully documented and shares do not ‘drift’ from one parcel to another, the distinction can be made. Experience shows that the loss- making investments tend to drift towards the trading portfolio and the gains towards the capital portfolio – all too often after the event. This approach seldom survives close scrutiny by the ATO.

Rules of thumb

Given all of this, are there any rules of thumb? Whilst there are many exceptions the following could be adopted as guidelines:

  • where a person holds an investment for longer than 12 months, any gain should be regarded as capital (but not always)
  • likewise, any loss on sale of such an asset would be regarded as a capital loss
  • a loss where expenses exceed income (such as a negatively geared rental property) is a revenue loss
  • regular, high volume trading will be viewed as revenue gains and losses.

Moving to the loss rules, the following matters should be noted:

  • revenue losses can be applied against either income or capital gains
  • capital losses can only be applied against capital gains, not against income
  • one dollar of capital loss offsets one dollar of gross capital gain
  • one dollar of revenue loss offsets two dollars of gross long-term capital gain. That is, if the gain relates to an asset which a person has held for longer than 12 months, the 50% CGT discount applies to reduce the taxable amount to half of the gross gain. The revenue loss is then applied against this reduced amount.

The worked example

Where do these rules take us in the above example? The investor would offset the capital loss on shares dollar for dollar against the capital gain. The rental loss could be offset against salary.

If we change the example and assume the investor had no capital losses, they could apply the rental loss, either in full against their salary or part against the ‘after 50% discount’ gain of $5,000 and the remaining $5,000 against salary. The tax outcome would be the same in either case.

As an alternative, they might consider crystallising capital losses by selling shares with otherwise unrealised losses. Care would need to be taken with such a strategy as it may be viewed unfavourably by the ATO, particularly if the investor sold the investments prior to 30 June and bought back the same investments shortly after year-end.

As 30 June approaches, investors should take the time to review their portfolios and also the position they are taking in respect of tax treatment.

 

Ray Cummings is Principal of Greenoak Advisory Pty Ltd, and for 15 years was a Tax Partner at Pitcher Partners.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

The when and why of four million Australian retirees

Who needs the Caymans? 10 ways to avoid paying tax

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.