Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 17

Taxing as revenue or capital gains and why it matters

Investors are often confused about the difference between a revenue profit and a capital gain. People are even more confused by whether a loss is a revenue loss or a capital loss and are frequently bamboozled as to which type of loss can be applied against which gain.

Does it matter?

Characterisation as revenue or capital

By way of illustration, assume an investor, in addition to their salary, has gross gains from sale of shares of $10,000, an equivalent loss from sale of shares and also a $10,000 loss from a negatively geared rental property. All equities have been held for longer than 12 months and the investor is not a share trader.

There are three fundamental questions to answer:

  • is the gain a revenue profit or a capital gain?
  • are the losses revenue losses or capital losses?
  • are there any restrictions in applying the losses against income or gains?

Characterisation of a gain or loss as revenue or capital is a matter of fact and circumstance having regard to many matters such as whether the investor is an individual or other legal entity, the investor’s intention and the nature of the activity undertaken.

In forming a view, the ATO will have regard to various factors including the dollar value of the portfolio, the type of securities, the frequency and dollar value of turnover, the average holding period and whether or not the investor has what the ATO would regard as a sophisticated trading strategy or methodology. Weighing these up, the ATO may reach a conclusion that the securities are held as revenue assets.

In contrast, a passive holding where equities are bought and sold infrequently is more likely to be regarded as capital. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules as to what constitutes frequent activity.

Just to confuse matters, it is possible for an investor to designate one parcel of shares as a trading (revenue) portfolio and another as capital. Provided this is carefully documented and shares do not ‘drift’ from one parcel to another, the distinction can be made. Experience shows that the loss- making investments tend to drift towards the trading portfolio and the gains towards the capital portfolio – all too often after the event. This approach seldom survives close scrutiny by the ATO.

Rules of thumb

Given all of this, are there any rules of thumb? Whilst there are many exceptions the following could be adopted as guidelines:

  • where a person holds an investment for longer than 12 months, any gain should be regarded as capital (but not always)
  • likewise, any loss on sale of such an asset would be regarded as a capital loss
  • a loss where expenses exceed income (such as a negatively geared rental property) is a revenue loss
  • regular, high volume trading will be viewed as revenue gains and losses.

Moving to the loss rules, the following matters should be noted:

  • revenue losses can be applied against either income or capital gains
  • capital losses can only be applied against capital gains, not against income
  • one dollar of capital loss offsets one dollar of gross capital gain
  • one dollar of revenue loss offsets two dollars of gross long-term capital gain. That is, if the gain relates to an asset which a person has held for longer than 12 months, the 50% CGT discount applies to reduce the taxable amount to half of the gross gain. The revenue loss is then applied against this reduced amount.

The worked example

Where do these rules take us in the above example? The investor would offset the capital loss on shares dollar for dollar against the capital gain. The rental loss could be offset against salary.

If we change the example and assume the investor had no capital losses, they could apply the rental loss, either in full against their salary or part against the ‘after 50% discount’ gain of $5,000 and the remaining $5,000 against salary. The tax outcome would be the same in either case.

As an alternative, they might consider crystallising capital losses by selling shares with otherwise unrealised losses. Care would need to be taken with such a strategy as it may be viewed unfavourably by the ATO, particularly if the investor sold the investments prior to 30 June and bought back the same investments shortly after year-end.

As 30 June approaches, investors should take the time to review their portfolios and also the position they are taking in respect of tax treatment.

 

Ray Cummings is Principal of Greenoak Advisory Pty Ltd, and for 15 years was a Tax Partner at Pitcher Partners.

 

  •   30 May 2013
  • 3
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Completing the reform of CGT: tax real losses like real gains

Div 296's million-dollar reset worth $25,000

Tax deductibility of financial advice improves affordability

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.