Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 308

Tech Wreck 2.0 and Debt Wreck 2.0 are coming

George Bush once famously mangled the old saying,Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” It will be embarrassing for investors in the coming years when they realise they’ve been fooled twice. In both equity and debt markets, investors are buying securities that have identical characteristics to the disasters of the recent past. Whether it’s initial public offerings (IPOs), tech shares, housing debt, high-yield debt or sovereign debt, previous booms and busts give a clear guide to what will eventually end badly.

Tech Wreck 2.0 and hope over experience

One of the most consistent ways to gauge the bullishness of equity investors is to assess the quality and quantity of IPOs. IPO volumes tend to rise through the cycle, peaking when equity indices are near their peaks. Those who own and manage businesses are generally well placed to identify when the market will pay them a favourable price.

In 2019, a boom year so far for IPOs in the US will likely make it the best since the record volumes of 1999 and 2000. When private capital raisings are included, the recent spike is even bigger, with venture capital investments in 2018 smashing the record from 2000.

A good indicator of IPO quality is the percentage of new issues that are unprofitable. This topped 80% in 2000 at the height of the tech bubble, but this level was surpassed in 2018, as shown below. Buying businesses that lose money indicates investors are preferring hope over experience.

Source: Quartz

The IPOs of Uber and Lyft this year have both been high profile doozies that sum up the mood. Lyft went first, pricing at $72 per share and is now trading around $57. It’s larger competitor Uber priced at $45 per share and is now sitting below $41. Both companies have a long history of using capital raisings to cover their losses, with no plans to become profitable any time soon. Roger Montgomery’s analysis of Uber is well worth a read, where he says the company has no long-term future. Harris Kupperman shares the sentiment. He posited that Uber’s IPO was so big it might have soaked up most of the remaining speculative capital that punts on these sorts of ventures.

Too many similarities with 2000

Two potential future IPOs that look like twins of Tech Wreck disasters are and WeWork. is an online pet supply company that lost $268 million in 2018 on $3.5 billion of sales. It looks an awful lot like, the poster child of the Tech Wreck which managed to go from IPO to bankruptcy in a mere 10 months in 2000. WeWork is an office sub-leasing business that lost $1.9 billion on $1.8 billion of revenue in 2018. It looks a lot like the Tech Wreck office space firm Regus, which filed for bankruptcy in 2003.

One of the hallmarks of the Tech Wreck was dodgy financial information and dubious measures of success. Technology companies are often pioneers, whether in the software and services they provide or in their ability to come up with distracting metrics. Some may remember the obsession with 'eyeballs' rather than earnings back in the tech boom days. That sounds an awful lot like the monthly user counts that some investors are religiously monitoring today.

Some of today’s tech giants, notably Google and Facebook, have done a great job of turning their huge number of users into advertising revenue streams, leading some to assume that all companies with large user bases will inevitably be profitable. Forgotten is the need for a near monopoly service that competitors can’t easily replicate. The likelihood of Uber and Lyft turning out the same way as Google is extremely low as the proliferation of alternative taxi services shows. The inability to turn a profit when scale efficiencies are already substantial is another warning sign.

In order to offer a fig leaf of credibility to their current valuations, many tech companies are creating bizarre financial terms. My favourite is 'community-adjusted EBITDA' for WeWork, which excludes taxes, stock grants, marketing and administrative costs. Tesla has long been called out for accounting shenanigans with the regular turnover of its most senior accounting and financial officers another warning sign. Tesla’s attempts at disguising its high level of cash burn recently came unstuck. The announcement this month that it would run out of cash in 10 months without radical change has seen its share price sink to almost half the level it was six months ago.

It’s only taken 20 years but the hallmarks of excess in the Tech Wreck are in play again.

Debt Wreck 2.0

The low point of the GFC was a decade ago, but lessons have already been forgotten. The debacle that was US subprime mortgages has come back to life in a smaller way. The US mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been busy cutting back on the down payments required and loosening restrictions on the minimum income a borrower needs to service a loan. Lending quality for first-time home buyers is particularly poor. This time around it will be US taxpayers picking up the tab through the government ownership and insurance of the mortgage aggregators.

It’s not just the US where dubious mortgages are proliferating. Canada, Spain, several Northern Europe countries and Australia have all been called out for excessively easy housing credit.

Global high-yield debt markets seem determined to go beyond the stupidity seen in 2006 and 2007. The collapse in covenants is a flashing red light that lenders are desperate to push money out of the door on almost any terms. In the lead up to the GFC, covenant-lite leveraged loans were less than 30% of total leveraged loans. Borrowers that were given covenant-lite loans typically had B+ or higher ratings, having some level of inbuilt cushion. Today only the worst of the worst borrowers can’t obtain a covenant-lite loan. Holders of covenant-lite loans should expect a slew of their borrowers to slowly bleed to death, with the lack of covenants having cut-off their ability to take early action when the borrower still has some equity value.

Source: Business Insider

Government debt weaknesses

It’s a similar story for sovereign debt as the European debt crisis is likely to re-emerge in coming years. Italy’s economy is showing the same signs that Greece did before its ongoing debt crisis, but Italy is almost 10 times bigger. The doom loop of bank failures leading to government failures and vice versa has not been fixed, increasing the risk of systemic and cascading failures. Deutsche Bank’s share price hitting record lows shows it remains an enormous risk, but there are dozens of small and medium-sized banks in Italy and Spain that are calling on their governments for additional bailouts.

In the US, a wide swathe of state and municipal governments continue to run up their debts, as well as accruing pension and healthcare obligations. States such as Illinois can add population decline to their list of issues, which reinforces the downward cycle as the smaller remaining population needs to regularly pay higher taxes to cover the increasing interest and pension obligations. The defaults of Detroit (2013) and Puerto Rico (2016) show what lies ahead for bondholders. Heavy debt haircuts will be required to allow these jurisdictions to right their financial position.

Emerging and frontier markets are now showing signs of kicking off another cycle of defaults and restructurings. The last year has seen Argentina, Pakistan and Turkey go from having easy access to debt markets to now needing assistance to meet their upcoming debt maturities. A slew of frontier economies including Iraq and Tajikistan have used the loose lending of recent years to issue debt despite having obvious challenges in meeting future repayments.


It is often said that those who do not remember the past are doomed to repeat it. Some investment decisions made in recent years bear the hallmarks of the speculative investments made before the Tech Wreck and the GFC. With the recent pullback in several high-profile tech shares, bank shares and the surging yields for a handful of emerging market sovereigns, we might be witnessing the beginning of a necessary and inevitable process of taking out the investment trash.


Jonathan Rochford, CFA, is Portfolio Manager for Narrow Road Capital. This article is for educational purposes and is not a substitute for professional and tailored financial advice. This article expresses the views of the author at a point in time, which may change in the future with no obligation on Narrow Road Capital or the author to publicly update these views.


Insane prices as private equity quits market

Four bubbly market pockets show heightened risk for investors

Bounce back delivers super second-half for IPOs


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

Critics of franking credits are missing the main point. The taxable income of shareholders/taxpayers must also include the company tax previously paid to the ATO before the dividend was distributed. It is fair.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Joe Hockey on the big investment influences on Australia

Former Treasurer Joe Hockey became Australia's Ambassador to the US and he now runs an office in Washington, giving him a unique perspective on geopolitical issues. They have never been so important for investors.

Investment strategies

The tipping point for investing in decarbonisation

Throughout time, transformative technology has changed the course of human history, but it is easy to be lulled into believing new technology will also transform investment returns. Where's the tipping point?

Exchange traded products

The options to gain equity exposure with less risk

Equity investing pays off over long terms but comes with risks in the short term that many people cannot tolerate, especially retirees preserving capital. There are ways to invest in stocks with little downside.

Exchange traded products

8 ways LIC bonus options can benefit investors

Bonus options issued by Listed Investment Companies (LICs) deliver many advantages but there is a potential dilutionary impact if options are exercised well below the share price. This must be factored in.


Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Investment strategies

Three demographic themes shaping investments for the future

Focussing on companies that will benefit from slow moving, long duration and highly predictable demographic trends can help investors predict future opportunities. Three main themes stand out.

Fixed interest

It's not high return/risk equities versus low return/risk bonds

High-yield bonds carry more risk than investment grade but they offer higher income returns. An allocation to high-yield bonds in a portfolio - alongside equities and other bonds – is worth considering.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.