Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 593

The pros and cons of debt recycling strategies

Debt recycling is a powerful strategy for those juggling the seemingly competing goals of debt reduction and building an investment portfolio. Many people have a natural instinct to pay off the home first, then consider investing later. However, waiting to invest can be a wasted opportunity. Through debt recycling, you can tackle both financial goals in a smart way, with significant benefits.

Online searches and forum posts reveal huge misunderstandings about debt recycling, in many cases because it’s not just one single strategy – there are several twists or varieties to the central theme. Here's an outline of the basics of debt recycling and how it can be used.

What is debt recycling?

At its core, debt recycling is a financial strategy that allows you to replace non-deductible home loan debt with deductible investment debt. It’s a powerful strategy for paying off your home sooner AND building an investment portfolio at the same time.

Typically, the debt recycling process involves using home equity borrowings to invest in income-generating assets, such as shares or managed funds. Income from these investments is used to pay down your mortgage, while the capital value of your investments typically grows, accelerating your wealth-building efforts.

Plain vanilla debt recycling

In its most basic form, debt recycling starts with paying down debt with surplus cashflow and borrowing back equivalent amounts to invest. Imagine a couple who have an existing $300,000 mortgage, and $1,000 per month surplus cashflow, which they direct towards additional mortgage repayments. After 12 months, that $12,000* is available for redraw. In conjunction with their lender and/or an experience mortgage broker, that available amount is split off into a separate loan account, then borrowed back for investment purposes (say some ETFs or managed funds). Their total debt is still $300,000, but it’s a combination of $288,000 non-deductible debt, and $12,000 of tax-deductible investment debt. Income from the investments can be used to pay their home loan down further, and each year they repeat and compound the strategy. Eventually, the non-deductible debt will be down to zero, and the investment debt up to $300,000, meaning their debt is fully recycled. Over this time the shares, ETFs or managed funds ought to have increased in capital value.

This ‘plain vanilla’ strategy is fairly non-threatening – there’s no actual increase in debt levels relative to the starting position. The benefits of tax and market exposure are slow to begin with, but it’s the routine and compounding nature of the process that makes this quite a powerful strategy over time, especially compared to a ‘pay off the home first and invest later’ approach.

Care should be taken to ensure the loan structure keeps personal and investment debt separate at all times.

*In practice, interest savings on their loan will give them slightly more than $12,000 available.

Vanilla with a dash of spice

To kick off a debt recycling strategy with a bit more gusto, it’s quite common to apply for an increased loan facility and invest an initial amount on day one. I always suggest “a big enough amount to be meaningful, but not so much that it’s scary.” We’re essentially introducing some extra leverage at the start, so compared to the vanilla debt recycle, there’s the potential for increased investment returns over time, assuming the investment portfolio outperforms the net cost of borrowing. This is only possible if the client has enough equity and loan servicing capacity to borrow the additional amount – otherwise they need to create the borrowing capacity via extra repayments in the vanilla scenario. The amount chosen for an initial investment can be placed in a single transaction or fed in gradually to reduce timing risk.


A modest vanilla Debt Recycle with an initial $60,000 extra gearing

The one-off debt recycle with existing assets

Existing assets, such as employee share parcels, and ETFs and managed funds acquired either before the mortgage, from an inheritance, or from spare cashflow (not borrowings) represent an additional opportunity for debt recycling. Remember we’re aiming to reduce non-deductible debt and replace it with tax-deductible debt. So, imagining we have $100,000 of available existing assets that did not involve borrowings, that’s $100,000 of debt we could recycle (less potential Capital Gains Tax). After calculating the CGT (let’s imagine it’s $10,000) the benefit from this one-off debt recycle would be $90,000 x loan interest rate (say 6%) x Marginal Tax Rate (say 47% including Medicare) = $2,539 of tax saved per annum, or approximately a four-year break even. Lower CGT (eg employee shares immediately sold on vesting, investments with low gains etc) present an easy decision, as do assets that you want to dispose of anyway. Replacement assets, acquired with borrowed funds, might be the same, similar, or completely different investments according to preference - just be careful with the ATO’s wash-sale provisions.

Debt recycling property

The previous concept can also apply in some cases to property assets – for instance, former principal places of residence or investment properties with significant equity.

These cases really do require detailed analysis, as there can be significant transaction costs to sell and buy, and investment properties would likely incur significant CGT.

However, knocking $1 million off your home loan through sale of another property and buying a replacement investment property, thereby recycling $1 million of debt, can bring a $28,200 per annum (p.a.) tax saving – so it’s worth a thought. Even more so if you want to exit that particular property or location for whatever reason.

Properties that are most likely to be suitable for a debt recycle include former principal residences (due to no CGT) that were largely paid off, inherited properties that pre-date CGT or were themselves a principal place of residence, as well as properties owned as a principal place of residence before commencing a new relationship.

Property recycle with a trust

One last variation that also involves property comes in where a former principal place of residence is intended to be retained as an investment property, but where there is a desire to maximise tax deductible debt. With this strategy, the property is sold to a trust structure, with full borrowings, releasing maximum equity for non-deductible debt reduction. Costs to be considered include stamp duty on the transfer, annual accounting costs for the trust structure and usually land tax, but the savings include sale costs on the property and stamp duty on a replacement property (assuming the alternative was to follow the previous property Debt Recycle strategy). As per the previous example where the fully paid off property is worth $1 million, when sold to a unit trust under this strategy, the $1 million of debt that is made tax deductible generates tax savings of up to $28,200 p.a. (less the costs of running the trust and land tax).

Conclusion

Many people have financial goals that include a debt-free home as well as a decent nest-egg and tackling them both via a debt recycling strategy can make those goals happen faster. It’s important to think outside the box and realise that there are several different types of debt recycling, which have a common theme of applying any available cash (from surplus cashflow, investment income, or disposal of existing assets) against non-deductible debt, and then borrowing funds back to invest (resulting in tax-deductible debt).

We highly recommend working with financial planners, accountants and mortgage brokers who are experienced with all forms of these strategies to ensure the right outcomes.

 

Alex Berlee is a financial adviser with AGS Financial Group Pty Ltd.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The rising tension between housing debt and retirement balances

Is 'The Great Australian Dream' a sham?

Debt binge main cause of house price rises

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.