Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 206

Is it time to review your super pension?

The financial media is replete with advice on the new super laws. Advisers, accountants, SMSFs specialists (myself included) and product providers are flat out getting ready in time.

The $1.6 million transfer balance cap is receiving most attention as existing pension balances will be measured on 1 July 2017. If your pension balance is under $1.6 million, you may think you don’t need to worry about it, but what if you and your spouse have over $1.6 million between you?

Importance of dealing with transfer balance cap

In this circumstance, if one of you dies and the survivor wants to keep the assets in the advantageous superannuation environment, the transfer balance cap becomes very relevant.

Check how the pension is structured to be paid out after a death. Under the transfer balance cap rules, where the pension is not ‘reversionary’, but the surviving spouse elects to receive the benefit as a pension, the balance will count towards that spouse’s cap straight away, and that could tip his or her pension transfer balance over $1.6 million. This will need to be dealt with as soon as possible.

In the past, a surviving spouse was able to roll over a pension from a deceased spouse (known as a ‘death benefit pension’) after a specified time period (six months from date of death, or three months from grant of probate). This provision has been removed and it will always be a death benefit pension and unable to be rolled over.

So, if you receive a death benefit pension from your spouse which results in you exceeding your $1.6 million transfer balance cap, the only way to keep the money in the superannuation system is to roll your own pension back to accumulation.

A ‘reversionary’ pension, on the other hand, will not be assessed to the surviving spouse for 12 months from the date of death, buying a bit of time before having to deal with the excess. The same issues arise, but you have a year to figure out what to do.

Correct set-up makes a difference

Hence, setting up the pension correctly while you’re alive can make all the difference to your spouse on your death. Let me put that into a case study to illustrate.

On 1 July 2017, Brian, 76, has an account-based pension valued at $1,400,000, while his wife, Jenny’s, 72, is worth $900,000. Both pensions are ‘reversionary’ to each other.

On 25 July 2017, Brian passes away. His pension is valued at $1,380,000 and continues uninterrupted to Jenny. Technically, Jenny’s total pension balance is now over $1.6 million, however, the reversionary pension will not count towards Jenny’s cap until 25 July 2018, giving her time to consider her options.

Jenny cannot roll over any of Brian’s pension, she can elect to roll over some or all of her pension to accumulation. She decides to roll over enough to bring her transfer balance cap to $1.6 million.

Jenny’s Transfer Balance Cap

Had Brian’s pension not been reversionary, Jenny would have had to deal with this soon after his death, at a difficult time for her. Being reversionary also gives tax free income and capital gains for an extra year. Jenny has time to decide that the assets supporting her own pension should be sold before being transferred to accumulation.

If Brian’s balance was over $1.6 million, Jenny would have no choice but to commute the amount over $1.6 million to a lump sum payment, and transfer her whole balance back to accumulation.

If both partners are still in accumulation phase, what happens if one dies? This is similar to a non-reversionary pension. If a surviving spouse elects to take the benefits as a pension, the value of the pension account will count immediately towards his or her transfer balance cap.

Can anyone be nominated to receive a reversionary pension on my death?

A death benefit pension can only be paid to a:

  • Spouse, including de facto and same sex partner
  • Person who was financially dependent on the deceased
  • Person who had an interdependency relationship with the deceased person, and
  • Child, including adopted, step and ex-nuptial, who is under 18, over 18 with a disability, or 18 to 24 and financially dependent on the deceased.

Next time you’re in for an investment review, speak to your adviser about the structure of your pension. It may need some tweaking.

 

Alex Denham is a Senior Adviser with Dartnall Advisers. Prior to becoming an adviser, she spent 20 years in senior technical roles with several financial services companies. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual and is based on a current understanding of the rules.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Timing on transfer balance cap and CGT relief

Did retirees lose out when they accepted defined benefit schemes?

How to prevent excessive superannuation balances

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.