Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 296

What do top ESG companies look like?

ESG integration is a branch of investment analysis that assesses companies on their environmental (E) and social (S) impacts as well as the quality of their governance (G). It is a tool used by investment managers to gauge the long-term financial health of companies. For example, a company that pollutes the environment could face financial penalties as well as damage to its reputation, both of which could affect the company’s profitability. In this sense, ESG integration is ethically passive - it is concerned about the financial impact of things like pollution, poor labour practices and a lack of diversity on boards – not whether they are right or wrong.

Ethics is different

An ethical investment manager, on the other hand, will actively screen out companies that engage in poor practices and look to invest in companies that do good for people and the planet. ESG integration is often used by fund managers who want to take a best-in-sector approach. That said, it can still be a useful tool for ethical managers who want to analyse the non-financial practices of companies in more detail. However, basing an investment strategy on ESG alone will never be a replacement for a truly ethical investment approach.

To fully appreciate the difference between ESG and ethical investment, it’s worth taking a look at the types of companies that feature on ESG lists or indices. One of the better-known indices is The Dow Jones Sustainability Australia Index, which is reviewed annually by investment manager RobecoSAM using the latter’s Corporate Sustainability Assessment.

In its annual update in September 2018, S&P Dow Jones described the index as the “gold standard for corporate sustainability” based on “financially material ESG factors”. The Dow Jones Sustainability Australia Index is made up of 43 companies with some surprising inclusions among them. This list is eye-opening because it tends to favour companies with comprehensive sustainability reports rather than the most socially-responsible business practices.

Let’s take a look at some of the companies that made the list.

Gambling companies

Two notable inclusions in the index are gambling and entertainment companies Star Entertainment Group and Tabcorp Holdings. Star Entertainment Group is the owner of casinos in Brisbane, the Gold Coast and Sydney, while Tabcorp offers wagering and gaming services and also has a media arm that broadcasts horse racing on Sky. On the face of it, it is hard to understand how companies that earn the majority of their revenue from gambling could be considered sustainable. On its website Star Entertainment Group touts itself as the “global leader of the casino and gaming industry” as per the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Star Entertainment Group notes it achieved maximum scores from Dow Jones in the areas of anti-crime policy/measures and promoting responsible gambling.

In its 2018 Sustainability Report, Tabcorp describes itself as a “significant economic contributor to Australia” with a focus on “responsible gambling and advertising practices”. However, despite its impressive ESG credentials Tabcorp was fined $45 million for breaching money laundering and terrorism financing laws in 2017, which at the time was the largest civil penalty in Australian corporate history.

Mining explosives

Also on the Dow Jones Sustainability Australia Index is Melbourne-headquartered multinational Orica, which supplies commercial explosives for the mining, quarrying, and oil and gas sectors. Orica publishes a comprehensive sustainability report each year that covers issues like workplace safety, climate change and good governance. However, in 2014 Orica was forced to pay $768,250 for releasing pollutants at its Kooragang and Botany plants (the largest penalty every issued by the Land and Environment Court), and in 2012 the Queensland Court ordered Orica to pay $432,000 after the company pleaded guilty to releasing cyanide into the environment on 217 occasions. In addition, The Newcastle Herald reported in 2011 that hexavalent chromium had “rained down’” on about 25 workers on duty at the Kooragang Island plant in August that year.

Other ESG companies in the Dow Jones Sustainability Australia Index include mining and fossil fuel companies Oil Search, Woodside Petroleum, Wesfarmers and Newcrest Mining. It’s encouraging to see these companies are paying attention to their environmental impact and looking to give back to the communities they impact with their activities. Oil Search, for example, has donated $5 million to support disaster relief efforts in Papua New Guinea as well as developing roads, hospitals and schools.

However, some mining practices are unsustainable in the long term, contrary to the high ESG rankings of the companies named in this article. That said, some ethical investors may decide to invest in mining companies after intense scrutiny.

Australian Ethical does not invest in any of the companies discussed. However, we acknowledge, for example, that metallurgical coal is necessary in the short term to make steel to build the renewable infrastructure of the future. Higher recycling rates for scrap steel (a process which does not require metallurgical coal) will help reduce the demand for this type of coal.

ESG can be a useful tool but it should never be mistaken for a genuinely ethical approach to investment. Ethical investors are focused on delivering returns without harming (and indeed proactively benefiting) the planet, people and animals. Australian Ethical assesses each company on its merits based on the principles laid out in our Ethical Charter, which has been unchanged since 1986.

 

Leah Willis is Head of Client Relationships at Australian Ethical, a sponsor of Cuffelinks.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Is it a myth that 'purpose' can drive corporate profits?

Beyond the acronym, navigating important ESG choices

Investment learnings from the COVID-19 crisis

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Australia’s bounty: is it just diversified luck?

Increases in commodity prices have fuelled global inflation while benefiting commodities exporters like Australia. Oftentimes, booms lead to busts and investors need to get the timing right on pricing cycles to be successful.

Meg on SMSFs – More on future-proofing your fund

Single-member SMSFs face challenges where the eventual beneficiaries (or support team in the event of incapacity) will be the member’s adult children. Even worse, what happens if one or more of the children live overseas?

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Five features of a fair performance fee, including a holiday

Most investors pay little attention to the performance fee on their fund but it can have a material impact on returns, especially if the structure is unfair. Check for these features and a coming fee holiday.

Interviews

Ned Bell on why there’s a generational step change underway

During market dislocation events, investors react irrationally and it should be a great environment for active management. The last few years have been an easy ride on tech stocks but it's now all about quality.  

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Powers of attorney for your fund

Granting an enduring power of attorney is an important decision for the trustees of an SMSF. There are alternatives and protections to consider including who should perform this vital role and when.

Property

The great divergence: the evolution of the 'magnetic' workplace

The pandemic profoundly impacted the way we use real estate but in a post-pandemic environment, tenant preferences and behaviours are now providing more certainty to the outlook of our major real estate sectors.

Shares

Bank reporting season scorecard May 2022

A key feature of the May results for the banking sector was profits trending back to pre-Covid-19 levels, thanks to lower than expected unemployment and the growth in house prices.

Why gender diversity matters for investors

Companies with a boys’ club approach to leadership are a red flag for investors. On the other hand, companies that walk the talk on women in leadership roles perform better, potentially making them better investments. 

Economy

Is it all falling apart for central banks?

Central banks are unable to ignore the inflation in front of them, but underlying macro-economic conditions indicate that inflation may be transitory and the consequences of monetary tightening dangerous.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.