Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 296

What do top ESG companies look like?

ESG integration is a branch of investment analysis that assesses companies on their environmental (E) and social (S) impacts as well as the quality of their governance (G). It is a tool used by investment managers to gauge the long-term financial health of companies. For example, a company that pollutes the environment could face financial penalties as well as damage to its reputation, both of which could affect the company’s profitability. In this sense, ESG integration is ethically passive - it is concerned about the financial impact of things like pollution, poor labour practices and a lack of diversity on boards – not whether they are right or wrong.

Ethics is different

An ethical investment manager, on the other hand, will actively screen out companies that engage in poor practices and look to invest in companies that do good for people and the planet. ESG integration is often used by fund managers who want to take a best-in-sector approach. That said, it can still be a useful tool for ethical managers who want to analyse the non-financial practices of companies in more detail. However, basing an investment strategy on ESG alone will never be a replacement for a truly ethical investment approach.

To fully appreciate the difference between ESG and ethical investment, it’s worth taking a look at the types of companies that feature on ESG lists or indices. One of the better-known indices is The Dow Jones Sustainability Australia Index, which is reviewed annually by investment manager RobecoSAM using the latter’s Corporate Sustainability Assessment.

In its annual update in September 2018, S&P Dow Jones described the index as the “gold standard for corporate sustainability” based on “financially material ESG factors”. The Dow Jones Sustainability Australia Index is made up of 43 companies with some surprising inclusions among them. This list is eye-opening because it tends to favour companies with comprehensive sustainability reports rather than the most socially-responsible business practices.

Let’s take a look at some of the companies that made the list.

Gambling companies

Two notable inclusions in the index are gambling and entertainment companies Star Entertainment Group and Tabcorp Holdings. Star Entertainment Group is the owner of casinos in Brisbane, the Gold Coast and Sydney, while Tabcorp offers wagering and gaming services and also has a media arm that broadcasts horse racing on Sky. On the face of it, it is hard to understand how companies that earn the majority of their revenue from gambling could be considered sustainable. On its website Star Entertainment Group touts itself as the “global leader of the casino and gaming industry” as per the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Star Entertainment Group notes it achieved maximum scores from Dow Jones in the areas of anti-crime policy/measures and promoting responsible gambling.

In its 2018 Sustainability Report, Tabcorp describes itself as a “significant economic contributor to Australia” with a focus on “responsible gambling and advertising practices”. However, despite its impressive ESG credentials Tabcorp was fined $45 million for breaching money laundering and terrorism financing laws in 2017, which at the time was the largest civil penalty in Australian corporate history.

Mining explosives

Also on the Dow Jones Sustainability Australia Index is Melbourne-headquartered multinational Orica, which supplies commercial explosives for the mining, quarrying, and oil and gas sectors. Orica publishes a comprehensive sustainability report each year that covers issues like workplace safety, climate change and good governance. However, in 2014 Orica was forced to pay $768,250 for releasing pollutants at its Kooragang and Botany plants (the largest penalty every issued by the Land and Environment Court), and in 2012 the Queensland Court ordered Orica to pay $432,000 after the company pleaded guilty to releasing cyanide into the environment on 217 occasions. In addition, The Newcastle Herald reported in 2011 that hexavalent chromium had “rained down’” on about 25 workers on duty at the Kooragang Island plant in August that year.

Other ESG companies in the Dow Jones Sustainability Australia Index include mining and fossil fuel companies Oil Search, Woodside Petroleum, Wesfarmers and Newcrest Mining. It’s encouraging to see these companies are paying attention to their environmental impact and looking to give back to the communities they impact with their activities. Oil Search, for example, has donated $5 million to support disaster relief efforts in Papua New Guinea as well as developing roads, hospitals and schools.

However, some mining practices are unsustainable in the long term, contrary to the high ESG rankings of the companies named in this article. That said, some ethical investors may decide to invest in mining companies after intense scrutiny.

Australian Ethical does not invest in any of the companies discussed. However, we acknowledge, for example, that metallurgical coal is necessary in the short term to make steel to build the renewable infrastructure of the future. Higher recycling rates for scrap steel (a process which does not require metallurgical coal) will help reduce the demand for this type of coal.

ESG can be a useful tool but it should never be mistaken for a genuinely ethical approach to investment. Ethical investors are focused on delivering returns without harming (and indeed proactively benefiting) the planet, people and animals. Australian Ethical assesses each company on its merits based on the principles laid out in our Ethical Charter, which has been unchanged since 1986.

 

Leah Willis is Head of Client Relationships at Australian Ethical, a sponsor of Cuffelinks.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Is it a myth that 'purpose' can drive corporate profits?

Investment learnings from the COVID-19 crisis

ESG by new means, to new ends

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.