Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 218

Treasurer: super reform was difficult but we had no choice

Scott Morrison, Australia’s Treasurer, was interviewed at a conference on 1 September 2017 hosted by The Economist, called “Innovation as Competition: Australia’s Asian Future Summit 2017”. As it was not a prepared speech, there is no official record of his comments, although he gave a talk the previous day at Bloomberg, when some of the issues were similar.

After the interview, I asked him a question on superannuation engagement.

GH: Treasurer, one word we have not heard today at this Innovation Forum is a subject where Australia could claim to be a global leader and that is superannuation. Around the world, our superannuation system is the envy of everyone. Yet we still have an expectation that 80% of Australians by 2040 will draw some form of the age pension, and 90% of people don’t put extra money into super above the Superannuation Guarantee.

My first question, is the Government concerned by the lack of active engagement with superannuation and that people do not realise what their future outcomes are likely to be?

The second part is, even with those people who are engaged, when you reflect on the changes from 1 July, which you argue were driven by the desire to have a more equitable system, they were widely criticised by large parts of the industry and many people.”

Treasurer: “Well, first of all, that 80% figure. That’s true at a gross level, but the componentry changes in the Intergenerational Report show it basically inverts. The proportion we expect to be on the full pension and on the part pension after that period of time flips. The degree that people will rely on the age pension dramatically changes. We will have the same proportion of people on welfare, but the degree of reliance dramatically changes. That is an outcome of the scheme put in place 25 years ago.

There’s nothing wrong with making sure this scheme remains on track. The changes that I introduced this year were all about making the system definitely fairer, but sustainable. Australia has an aging population, and those in retirement age will become larger and larger as a proportion. We all know about the tax paid by those who have paid it all their lives, I acknowledge that, but the proportion of tax they pay after age 65 versus the working age population is obviously a lot, lot, lot less. So, if more and more people are going into a lower tax environment, and going into receiving payments on welfare, then the retirement income changes we made over two budgets were about getting that on a more sustainable footing. Whether it’s changes to the assets test for the pension or changes to the upper limits of our superannuation. That’s why we did it, and I think those changes were sensible.

I realise that for those who were impacted, it wasn’t something they liked, but with the fiscal environment we had and the demographic changes we were facing, I’m not sure what other choice we had. So that was a significant and difficult reform.

In terms of engagement with superannuation, I make these comments in terms of people’s ability to make additional contributions to super. When we went through the super changes, what was quite clear was that the caps and the potential balances people achieve and the limits we put on those were very high. For most income-earning Australians, those caps are stratospheric for them, they are not going to go close. When people are 50 to 55, they become a bit more focussed, that’s why we made some changes post the budget which better reflected giving some flexibility, particularly in those last 10 years before people go into retirement.

It does remain important in our economic system in Australia. I want there to be more choice, more accountability, better governance and my colleague Kelly O’Dwyer has been doing a lot of work in that area as well.

Greater choice. I keep coming back to this point. The strongest markets are those where the customer is the strongest, and that doesn’t matter whether it’s superannuation, telecommunications, utilities, electricity, gas, banking. All of those markets, we want to see the customer liberated. One of the biggest changes we can make which goes into the broader point about technology in this space is consumer data rights. For the Productivity Commission, that is one of the big blocks in productivity over the coming years. That is, giving customers control of their information. That is the building block every fintech, every technology and every company needs to be able to deliver a better service. That will change our economy, and it’s going to change the global economy.”


Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks. This article is paraphrased from a recording.


Leave a Comment:


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Let's make this clear again ... franking credits are fair

Critics of franking credits are missing the main point. The taxable income of shareholders/taxpayers must also include the company tax previously paid to the ATO before the dividend was distributed. It is fair.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Joe Hockey on the big investment influences on Australia

Former Treasurer Joe Hockey became Australia's Ambassador to the US and he now runs an office in Washington, giving him a unique perspective on geopolitical issues. They have never been so important for investors.

Investment strategies

The tipping point for investing in decarbonisation

Throughout time, transformative technology has changed the course of human history, but it is easy to be lulled into believing new technology will also transform investment returns. Where's the tipping point?

Exchange traded products

The options to gain equity exposure with less risk

Equity investing pays off over long terms but comes with risks in the short term that many people cannot tolerate, especially retirees preserving capital. There are ways to invest in stocks with little downside.

Exchange traded products

8 ways LIC bonus options can benefit investors

Bonus options issued by Listed Investment Companies (LICs) deliver many advantages but there is a potential dilutionary impact if options are exercised well below the share price. This must be factored in.


Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

Investment strategies

Three demographic themes shaping investments for the future

Focussing on companies that will benefit from slow moving, long duration and highly predictable demographic trends can help investors predict future opportunities. Three main themes stand out.

Fixed interest

It's not high return/risk equities versus low return/risk bonds

High-yield bonds carry more risk than investment grade but they offer higher income returns. An allocation to high-yield bonds in a portfolio - alongside equities and other bonds – is worth considering.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.