Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 576

A $3m super tax could make this strategy attractive again

Many Australians are concerned about the proposed additional tax on super balances over $3 million and are looking for strategies to keep their balance below this threshold.

For those with high balances, staying below the threshold would require taking money out of super. Typically, this can only be done after meeting a condition of release such as retiring or reaching the age of 65.

What about those who are yet to meet a condition of release? Are their options limited until they retire or attain age 65?

Not necessarily. After reaching preservation age, a Transition to Retirement Income Stream (TRIS), allows people to withdraw an income stream from their superannuation balance before they retire. Preservation age is the age at which you can access superannuation and depends on when you were born. It was age 55 for those born before 1 July 1960 and has gradually increased to age 60 for those born after 1 July 1964.

How a TRIS works

A TRIS allows super fund members to gradually move toward retirement by accessing a limited amount of their super balance before they stop work completely. They must satisfy their minimum annual pension requirement but cannot withdraw more than 10% of their TRIS balance in one financial year.

Drawing a TRIS becomes most tax effective after the age of 60, when the income stream payments become tax free.

There is no upper limit for a TRIS account, unlike the transfer balance cap which limits the amount people can have in a pension account to $1.9 million after meeting a condition of release. The TRIS does not count toward a member’s transfer balance cap until they enter retirement or attain age 65, whichever comes first.

Take the example of John who is 62 and has a total super balance of $3.05 million. If John were to commence a TRIS with his full balance, he could withdraw up to $305,000 from his super balance in one financial year tax free.

Assuming his account produces investment returns of 7% for the year, his balance would reduce to $2.96 million after withdrawing the $305,000.

A drawback of the TRIS, and reason why this strategy is not as popular as it once was, is that earnings on the assets supporting the TRIS balance do not receive the same tax-free treatment as earnings on a pension balance. Instead, income is taxed at the standard rate of 15%, with capital gains taxed at 10% as is the case during accumulation phase.

Setting up a TRIS

First a member must decide how much of their total super balance they wish to convert to a TRIS. A TRIS account is distinct from the members accumulation balance and typically requires the establishment of a new account. Those in a retail super fund will need to open a new member account with their super provider. If they are still contributing to superannuation, they may have two member accounts, an accumulation account to contribute to and a TRIS account they are withdrawing from.

Setting up a TRIS within an SMSF may be simpler. Once the fund assets are valued to determine the members benefit a TRIS account can be set-up within the SMSF, alongside the accumulation account if the member is still contributing. Establishment paperwork would need to be completed by the member.

Key points about starting a TRIS:

  • A TRIS can be started at any point during the financial year.
  • A minimum pension must be withdrawn during the financial year. For those under the age of 65 the minimum percentage is currently 4%.
  • The minimum pension may be pro-rated if the TRIS commenced after 1 July during the financial year.
  • The member cannot withdraw more than 10 per cent of the TRIS balance in one financial year.

Super rules are complex, so it’s important to get advice before implementing any strategy.

Who should consider a TRIS strategy?

Those between the ages of 60 and 65, who are yet to retire and wish to access to their super balance, are most likely to see the benefits of a TRIS strategy.

It could also be a way for people to reduce their total super balance, giving them the opportunity to equalise super amounts between spouses or transition wealth above $3 million into other investment structures.

The proposed legislation to introduce the tax on super balances over $3 million is yet to be passed and there is growing doubt over whether it will pass in its current form due to opposition in the Senate.

If passed, the legislation would come into effect from 1 July 2025, meaning a member’s total super balance would only be assessed at 30 June 2026. So, there is no need to rush to implement any strategies. Members have time to seek advice and consider the available options before making changes to their superannuation strategy.

 

Lindzi Caputo is a Wealth Management Director at HLB Mann Judd. This article is for general information only. It should not be accepted as authoritative advice and any person wishing to act upon the material should obtain properly considered advice which will take into account their own specific circumstances.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

How to shift into pension mode

The psychological shift from saving to spending in retirement

Are you paying tax by not starting a super pension?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.