Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 576

A $3m super tax could make this strategy attractive again

Many Australians are concerned about the proposed additional tax on super balances over $3 million and are looking for strategies to keep their balance below this threshold.

For those with high balances, staying below the threshold would require taking money out of super. Typically, this can only be done after meeting a condition of release such as retiring or reaching the age of 65.

What about those who are yet to meet a condition of release? Are their options limited until they retire or attain age 65?

Not necessarily. After reaching preservation age, a Transition to Retirement Income Stream (TRIS), allows people to withdraw an income stream from their superannuation balance before they retire. Preservation age is the age at which you can access superannuation and depends on when you were born. It was age 55 for those born before 1 July 1960 and has gradually increased to age 60 for those born after 1 July 1964.

How a TRIS works

A TRIS allows super fund members to gradually move toward retirement by accessing a limited amount of their super balance before they stop work completely. They must satisfy their minimum annual pension requirement but cannot withdraw more than 10% of their TRIS balance in one financial year.

Drawing a TRIS becomes most tax effective after the age of 60, when the income stream payments become tax free.

There is no upper limit for a TRIS account, unlike the transfer balance cap which limits the amount people can have in a pension account to $1.9 million after meeting a condition of release. The TRIS does not count toward a member’s transfer balance cap until they enter retirement or attain age 65, whichever comes first.

Take the example of John who is 62 and has a total super balance of $3.05 million. If John were to commence a TRIS with his full balance, he could withdraw up to $305,000 from his super balance in one financial year tax free.

Assuming his account produces investment returns of 7% for the year, his balance would reduce to $2.96 million after withdrawing the $305,000.

A drawback of the TRIS, and reason why this strategy is not as popular as it once was, is that earnings on the assets supporting the TRIS balance do not receive the same tax-free treatment as earnings on a pension balance. Instead, income is taxed at the standard rate of 15%, with capital gains taxed at 10% as is the case during accumulation phase.

Setting up a TRIS

First a member must decide how much of their total super balance they wish to convert to a TRIS. A TRIS account is distinct from the members accumulation balance and typically requires the establishment of a new account. Those in a retail super fund will need to open a new member account with their super provider. If they are still contributing to superannuation, they may have two member accounts, an accumulation account to contribute to and a TRIS account they are withdrawing from.

Setting up a TRIS within an SMSF may be simpler. Once the fund assets are valued to determine the members benefit a TRIS account can be set-up within the SMSF, alongside the accumulation account if the member is still contributing. Establishment paperwork would need to be completed by the member.

Key points about starting a TRIS:

  • A TRIS can be started at any point during the financial year.
  • A minimum pension must be withdrawn during the financial year. For those under the age of 65 the minimum percentage is currently 4%.
  • The minimum pension may be pro-rated if the TRIS commenced after 1 July during the financial year.
  • The member cannot withdraw more than 10 per cent of the TRIS balance in one financial year.

Super rules are complex, so it’s important to get advice before implementing any strategy.

Who should consider a TRIS strategy?

Those between the ages of 60 and 65, who are yet to retire and wish to access to their super balance, are most likely to see the benefits of a TRIS strategy.

It could also be a way for people to reduce their total super balance, giving them the opportunity to equalise super amounts between spouses or transition wealth above $3 million into other investment structures.

The proposed legislation to introduce the tax on super balances over $3 million is yet to be passed and there is growing doubt over whether it will pass in its current form due to opposition in the Senate.

If passed, the legislation would come into effect from 1 July 2025, meaning a member’s total super balance would only be assessed at 30 June 2026. So, there is no need to rush to implement any strategies. Members have time to seek advice and consider the available options before making changes to their superannuation strategy.

 

Lindzi Caputo is a Wealth Management Director at HLB Mann Judd. This article is for general information only. It should not be accepted as authoritative advice and any person wishing to act upon the material should obtain properly considered advice which will take into account their own specific circumstances.

 

  •   4 September 2024
  • 4
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

When losses in super become irreplaceable

2 billion reasons to fix retirement income

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.