Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 129

Trusted professions go with the Flo’

Trust. It's at the heart of finance. Trust is that special property that bends time, allowing for the provision of a good, service or facility today on the strength of a belief that the other party will honour its financial obligation to make payment at or before some later date.

So central is trust to finance that the word ‘credit’ has its origin in the Latin crédere, which means to believe (and from which credo is also derived). The sudden collapse of trust in finance can be catastrophic, as demonstrated dramatically by the demise of the 158-year-old Lehman Brothers in the space of a few short months during 2008.

If the existence of trust lubricates the wheels of commerce and its absence acts as a retardant, then clearly being 'trusted' is economically advantageous. So just what makes one profession more trusted in the eyes of the public when compared to another?

Trust across professions - a survey approach

Unlike temperature or barometric pressure the measurement of trust resides not in the domain of physics but in sociology. Trust tends therefore to be measured by surveys that rank occupations across a scale from least trusted to most. One Australian example is the annual Roy Morgan Image of Professions Survey, run continuously since 1987 and expanding from an original 19 occupations to 30 now.

The Roy Morgan Survey respondents score people in various occupations for honesty and ethical standards using one of five possible responses; Very High, High, Average, Low or Very Low. A selection of these occupations appears in the table below, ranked highest to lowest for 2015.

The percentage of respondents rating each occupation as “Very High” or “High” for ethics and honesty for 2015 were:

HC Table1 091015

HC Table1 091015

Source: Roy Morgan Image of Professions Survey.

The results are unequivocal. Nursing is the most ethical and honest profession for the 21st year in a row. It's quite a gap to the next most trusted professions at 84%, jointly held by pharmacists and doctors, with teachers rounding out the top four.

And what of professions connected to finance, commerce and investing?  Accountants fare relatively well, sitting in the top half in 11th spot. Lawyers sit mid-pack, holding 15th on 31%, whilst financial planners sit two below lawyers in 17th place on an ‘approval’ score of 24%.

Other professions are clearly perceived as being less trustworthy. Amongst these are stockbrokers (26th), insurance brokers (27th) and finally in last place, car salespeople at a score of 4, a position held for 28 years in succession.

Why are nurses so trusted?

Part of the answer might lie in the high standard of training and education required. Most states require a minimum three year tertiary qualification to become a registered nurse. Further, once qualified, trainee nurses are under strict supervision, gradually increasing the range of treatments and medication they are allowed to administer as their experience builds.

Nursing is also a profession with a rich history of compassion, empathy and service. From Florence Nightingale tending the wounded in the Crimean War to the volunteers who battled the recent Ebola outbreak, nursing is a profession emphatically linked to the service of others over the advancement of self.

Can financial planners bridge the gap to nurses?

It’s clearly a long haul from 24% to 92%. Financial planning’s cause hasn’t been helped by a series of advice scandals over the past several years, some involving Australia’s largest financial institutions. In the wake of these scandals, the laws governing the provision of advice have been strengthened. Yet these are only part of a greater shift that must occur if financial planning is to sit amongst the truly trusted professions.

If you’re in a profession struggling with trust and credibility, nursing is a model of professionalism worth aspiring to. Modern nursing has a clear and unbroken lineage to the pioneering work of The Lady with the Lamp, as Florence Nightingale came affectionately to be known.

Nightingale was not a nurse by training. How could she be when no such training existed in mid-1800s Britain? She was in equal parts social reformer and statistician. Among her many contributions was the development of the pie chart to illustrate numerical proportion. With this and other novel data visualisation techniques she conveyed information vital to both the Crimean War effort and public hygiene more generally, and for her efforts became the first female member of the esteemed Royal Statistical Society.

Nightingale is best remembered, however, for establishing the foundations of the nursing profession in 1860. The principles she espoused; of service, diligence and compassion, together with a body of knowledge based on scientific observation and measurement, still resonates in the Nightingale Pledge which, although modernised since its first incarnation in 1893, remains at the core of nursing’s code of ethics in most jurisdictions.

Earning trust, and keeping it

Professions who find themselves not as universally trusted as nursing might first seek to focus on finding their reason for being, a reason other than the accrual of monetary benefits and material possessions. Unlike financial planning, nursing suffers little in the way of principal/agent effects. These effects present themselves when a person tries to simultaneously serve two parties with opposing interests. It is fair to surmise that in any hospital the patient, loved one, doctor, nurse and hospital board are all pulling in the same direction – a speedy recovery and discharge.

Perhaps the last word on trust is best left to the father of modern economics, Adam Smith, who in his 1759 work The Theory of Moral Sentiments, suggested that one should seek not to be praised but instead first to be worthy of praise.

In a similar vein, if financial planners wish to emulate the trusted status of nurses they should seek first not to be trusted, but to be worthy of trust. The pie chart, a tool used by financial planners the world over to sell complex investment concepts to clients, was after all first perfected by the lady who wrote the book on trust.

 

Harry Chemay is a former Certified Financial Planner who previously practised as a specialist SMSF advisor and as a consultant to APRA-regulated superannuation funds. He is CEO and co-founder of the automated investment service at www.clover.com.au.

3 Comments
Rebecca Boles
October 11, 2015

A great point to raise Harry! It's pretty horrifying to see planners so far down the list. I would be interested to hear how this could be strengthened (or adversely affected) by the introduction of robo-advice.

Harry Chemay
October 12, 2015

Hi Rebecca. Thanks for your comment. On the positive side Financial Planners, whilst at the lower end of the scale, are seen as more trustworthy than business executives, talk-back radio personalities and members of parliament. Make of that what you will. That said, there's clearly a lot more work to be done, above and beyond current regulatory initiatives, to drive financial planning further up the trust rankings.

For financial planning to cement its position among the ranks of highly trusted professions, hard conversations must first be had as to why the industry exists in the first place. Is it to be a source of distribution for product manufacturers? Or does it exist to help people organize their lives so that they can be their best financial selves?

Those planning businesses wedded to the former proposition will struggle. No longer is the planner the font of all knowledge and sole source of information on investment products and strategies. Playing 'gatekeeper' to information that is freely available on the web is a shaky foundation for the planning practice of the 21st century. That train has already left the platform. What's needed, desperately, are planners who coach, mentor and challenge clients to be their best financial selves. And yes, that means the occasional 'honest conversation' to keep clients on track to achieving their goals.

'Robo-advice' (I personally dislike this term for its pejorative connotation) will empower the latter type of planner whilst challenging the former. These automated investment services will allow people with less complex needs to invest without having to go though the traditional financial planning process. And let's face it, for very many Australians that process is cumbersome, time-consuming and of questionable financial value (here the regulatory burden has to share some of the blame).

'Robo-advice' may actually turn out to be an entry point for future full financial planning clients, as the circa 75% of unadvised Australians gain access to this type of technology. Shifting through life-stages will naturally create the need for quality personal advice between an adviser and former 'robo-only' user. There will always be a need for quality personal advice, but at the right time and for the right reasons. Even here however I see robo-advice platforms powering that interaction in the years to come, with 'big picture' conversations between adviser & client framed around future goals, dreams & aspirations, with the adviser's 'robo' doing the heavy quantitative lifting of probabilistic projections, goal optimization & investment strategy execution and monitoring.

'Robo-advice' will not disrupt competent forward-thinking planners any more than spreadsheets disrupted the accounting profession twenty years ago. Rather than disrupting accounting the spreadsheet revolution powered a whole new breed of accountants, able to use this new technology to generate new value-added revenue streams. What we don't see anymore (at least I don't) are dimly-lit rooms full of visor-wearing accountants cranking the arms on their calculators, ready to make written entries into their double-entry journals.

Martin Mulcare
October 10, 2015

Thanks, Harry,
I appreciate the lessons from the nursing profession. I also think that there is a valuable lesson to be gleaned from the professions in equal second place. At the risk of being simplistic, they provide a great lesson in the potential value of separating advice (doctors) from product (pharmacists) to the benefit of the reputation of both professions.

 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.