Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 467

Two index ETF gifts at tax time

Here's a reminder about two gifts for investors just in time for tax reviews and Christmas in July. Index Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are managed funds bought and sold on a listed exchanges such as the ASX and they have tax benefits compared with unlisted and actively-managed funds.

Gift 1: Streaming of capital gains

The 2021/22 financial year ended with negative returns for many asset classes. In periods of such volatility, many investors have exited the funds they were in, waiting for calmer days. Such a strategy comes with the perils of market timing, but in unlisted managed funds, the tax liability for an investor who stays in the fund goes up as other investors leave. ETFs have a mechanism to mitigate this risk.

In unlisted managed funds, if an investor redeems from the fund, they leave behind their share of the tax liabilities on any capital gains that are realised. In an unlisted managed fund these tax liabilities will be attributed to the remaining investors.

This does not happen in an ETF. Investors sell their units on the exchange to other investors, or the market maker. A market maker is someone whose job is to ensure there are units available for investors to buy or sell. In an ETF this doesn’t happen because the withdrawal mechanism is different.

An investor who wants to withdraw from an ETF simply sells their units on ASX where they are purchased by other investors or an ‘Authorised Participant’. Only Authorised Participants may withdraw (redeem) from the ETF. If they do, the capital gains created by the withdrawal can (and will) be passed to the Authorised Participant rather than being left behind for remaining investors. The ETF therefore protects investors from the impact of redemptions by other investors.

Those who have had a bad tax experience with an unlisted managed fund will understand. An ETF won’t hit you with a large taxable distribution the way an unlisted actively managed fund can do due to client redemptions.

This tax efficiency is often an overlooked benefit of investing ETFs.

Gift 2 – Passive management and less trading

Passive ETFs hold a portfolio of shares or other assets that track an index. As a passive ETF’s portfolio is automatically determined by the rules of the index, its portfolio only changes when the index changes. The contrast to this is actively managed funds where the fund manager picks the shares that they think are going to perform the best.

The tax problem with the active management process is that it causes a lot of shares to be sold each year, whereas the index fund process generally does not. The more shares that are sold by the active fund manager in a year, the higher the investor’s capital gains tax liability for that year. This brings forward capital gains. 

To summarise:

  1. ETFs are generally a tax efficient investment vehicle because they minimise exposure to capital gains tax when other investors redeem.
  2. As passive funds, ETFs typically have low turnover and therefore generate lower levels of capital gains tax compared to actively managed funds.

AMIT and TOFA

For more tax details on AMIT (Attributed Managed Investment Trust) and TOFA (Taxation of financial arrangements), see Avoiding tax time dinosaurs.

While AMIT can be used to smooth income payments, the TOFA hedging rules smooth the tax liabilities for investors in a fund that hedges its currency exposure. Without it, currency hedging can lead to tax shocks.

 

Michael Brown is Finance Director at VanEck, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This is general information only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from VanEck, click here.

We outline tax advantages in The Tax Advantages of ETFs which can be found on the ETF education page.

 

  •   20 July 2022
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
k28945
July 20, 2022

Feels like the tax efficiency must be more complicated than described here. There were come chunky capital gains included in distributions of some of the broad index ETFs for the June quarter. For example, in the case of SYI, 27% of the distribution is made up of franked dividends, and virtually all of the rest – 72% – is capital gains!! Even for the broad index tracker STW, 55% of the distribution is franked dividends, but 37% is capital gains (the rest is rats and mice).

Mark Bennett
July 20, 2022

I disagree with the comments in 'gift 1'. It is true that a retail investor may well sell their units to a market maker but market makers do not want to hold many units for much time, hence they will redeem the units via the RE and this will have the same impact as any redemption for a managed funds. Some structures, such as managed accounts, avoid this problem but ETFs whether active or passive do not. In terms of your gift 2, there are a number of actively managed ETFs [or ETMFs if that term is preferred] that have low portfolio turnover and hence distribute small amounts of capital gains, some have carried forward capital losses [often as a result or accepting buy backs rich with franking credits] so perhaps investors should consider both of these factors. If this is of importance to the investor, perhaps consider EIGA which has low turnover and carried forward tax losses.

Michael Brown
July 20, 2022

Thanks for reading my column. ETFs do indeed avoid this problem. When the market maker redeems, the ETF streams to the market maker any capital gains that are realised. So the capital gains tax impact that would otherwise fall on the remaining investors is removed.

It is true that managed accounts also avoid this problem. That said, it is very difficult though to administer portfolios of international equities or bonds through a managed account.

Chris
July 27, 2022

I can certainly confirm this was the case with a certain unlisted Colonial fund this year. Over 2022 the value of the investment decreased by 30% (including all distributions reinvested), yet still received a taxable distribution of about 30%. So no cash received, loss of 30% capital value and a tax bill. 

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Completing the reform of CGT: tax real losses like real gains

Is there a better way to reform the CGT discount?

Taking from the young, giving to the old

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.