Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 467

Two index ETF gifts at tax time

Here's a reminder about two gifts for investors just in time for tax reviews and Christmas in July. Index Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are managed funds bought and sold on a listed exchanges such as the ASX and they have tax benefits compared with unlisted and actively-managed funds.

Gift 1: Streaming of capital gains

The 2021/22 financial year ended with negative returns for many asset classes. In periods of such volatility, many investors have exited the funds they were in, waiting for calmer days. Such a strategy comes with the perils of market timing, but in unlisted managed funds, the tax liability for an investor who stays in the fund goes up as other investors leave. ETFs have a mechanism to mitigate this risk.

In unlisted managed funds, if an investor redeems from the fund, they leave behind their share of the tax liabilities on any capital gains that are realised. In an unlisted managed fund these tax liabilities will be attributed to the remaining investors.

This does not happen in an ETF. Investors sell their units on the exchange to other investors, or the market maker. A market maker is someone whose job is to ensure there are units available for investors to buy or sell. In an ETF this doesn’t happen because the withdrawal mechanism is different.

An investor who wants to withdraw from an ETF simply sells their units on ASX where they are purchased by other investors or an ‘Authorised Participant’. Only Authorised Participants may withdraw (redeem) from the ETF. If they do, the capital gains created by the withdrawal can (and will) be passed to the Authorised Participant rather than being left behind for remaining investors. The ETF therefore protects investors from the impact of redemptions by other investors.

Those who have had a bad tax experience with an unlisted managed fund will understand. An ETF won’t hit you with a large taxable distribution the way an unlisted actively managed fund can do due to client redemptions.

This tax efficiency is often an overlooked benefit of investing ETFs.

Gift 2 – Passive management and less trading

Passive ETFs hold a portfolio of shares or other assets that track an index. As a passive ETF’s portfolio is automatically determined by the rules of the index, its portfolio only changes when the index changes. The contrast to this is actively managed funds where the fund manager picks the shares that they think are going to perform the best.

The tax problem with the active management process is that it causes a lot of shares to be sold each year, whereas the index fund process generally does not. The more shares that are sold by the active fund manager in a year, the higher the investor’s capital gains tax liability for that year. This brings forward capital gains. 

To summarise:

  1. ETFs are generally a tax efficient investment vehicle because they minimise exposure to capital gains tax when other investors redeem.
  2. As passive funds, ETFs typically have low turnover and therefore generate lower levels of capital gains tax compared to actively managed funds.

AMIT and TOFA

For more tax details on AMIT (Attributed Managed Investment Trust) and TOFA (Taxation of financial arrangements), see Avoiding tax time dinosaurs.

While AMIT can be used to smooth income payments, the TOFA hedging rules smooth the tax liabilities for investors in a fund that hedges its currency exposure. Without it, currency hedging can lead to tax shocks.

 

Michael Brown is Finance Director at VanEck, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This is general information only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from VanEck, click here.

We outline tax advantages in The Tax Advantages of ETFs which can be found on the ETF education page.

 

4 Comments
Chris
July 27, 2022

I can certainly confirm this was the case with a certain unlisted Colonial fund this year. Over 2022 the value of the investment decreased by 30% (including all distributions reinvested), yet still received a taxable distribution of about 30%. So no cash received, loss of 30% capital value and a tax bill. 

Mark Bennett
July 20, 2022

I disagree with the comments in 'gift 1'. It is true that a retail investor may well sell their units to a market maker but market makers do not want to hold many units for much time, hence they will redeem the units via the RE and this will have the same impact as any redemption for a managed funds. Some structures, such as managed accounts, avoid this problem but ETFs whether active or passive do not. In terms of your gift 2, there are a number of actively managed ETFs [or ETMFs if that term is preferred] that have low portfolio turnover and hence distribute small amounts of capital gains, some have carried forward capital losses [often as a result or accepting buy backs rich with franking credits] so perhaps investors should consider both of these factors. If this is of importance to the investor, perhaps consider EIGA which has low turnover and carried forward tax losses.

Michael Brown
July 20, 2022

Thanks for reading my column. ETFs do indeed avoid this problem. When the market maker redeems, the ETF streams to the market maker any capital gains that are realised. So the capital gains tax impact that would otherwise fall on the remaining investors is removed.

It is true that managed accounts also avoid this problem. That said, it is very difficult though to administer portfolios of international equities or bonds through a managed account.

k28945
July 20, 2022

Feels like the tax efficiency must be more complicated than described here. There were come chunky capital gains included in distributions of some of the broad index ETFs for the June quarter. For example, in the case of SYI, 27% of the distribution is made up of franked dividends, and virtually all of the rest – 72% – is capital gains!! Even for the broad index tracker STW, 55% of the distribution is franked dividends, but 37% is capital gains (the rest is rats and mice).

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Raising the GST to 15%

Indexing tax thresholds to address bracket creep

CPI lowballs the true cost of living

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Trump's US dollar assault is fuelling CBA's rise

Australian-based investors have been perplexed by the steep rise in CBA's share price But it's becoming clear that US funds are buying into our largest bank as a hedge against potential QE and further falls in the US dollar.

Investment strategies

With markets near record highs, here's what you should do with your portfolio

Markets have weathered geopolitical turmoil, hitting near record highs. Investors face tough decisions on valuations, asset concentration, and strategic portfolio rebalancing for risk control and future returns.

Property

Soaring house prices may be locking people into marriages

Soaring house prices are deepening Australia's cost of living crisis - and possibly distorting marriage decisions. New research links unexpected price changes to whether couples separate or silently struggle together.

Investment strategies

Google is facing 'the innovator's dilemma'

Artificial intelligence is forcing Google to rethink search - and its future. As usage shifts and rivals close in, will it adapt in time, or become a cautionary tale of disrupted disruptors?

Investment strategies

Study supports what many suspected about passive investing

The surge in passive investing doesn’t just mirror the market—it shapes it, often amplifying the rise of the largest firms and creating new risks and opportunities. For investors, understanding these effects is essential.

Property

Should we dump stamp duties for land taxes?

Economists have long flagged the idea of swapping property taxes for land taxes for fairness and equity reasons. This looks at why what seems fairer may not deliver the outcomes that we expect.

Investing

Being human means being a bad investor

Many of the behaviours that have made humans such a successful species also make it difficult for us to be good, long-term investors. The key to better decision making is to understand what makes us human and adapt.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.