Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 467

Two index ETF gifts at tax time

Here's a reminder about two gifts for investors just in time for tax reviews and Christmas in July. Index Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are managed funds bought and sold on a listed exchanges such as the ASX and they have tax benefits compared with unlisted and actively-managed funds.

Gift 1: Streaming of capital gains

The 2021/22 financial year ended with negative returns for many asset classes. In periods of such volatility, many investors have exited the funds they were in, waiting for calmer days. Such a strategy comes with the perils of market timing, but in unlisted managed funds, the tax liability for an investor who stays in the fund goes up as other investors leave. ETFs have a mechanism to mitigate this risk.

In unlisted managed funds, if an investor redeems from the fund, they leave behind their share of the tax liabilities on any capital gains that are realised. In an unlisted managed fund these tax liabilities will be attributed to the remaining investors.

This does not happen in an ETF. Investors sell their units on the exchange to other investors, or the market maker. A market maker is someone whose job is to ensure there are units available for investors to buy or sell. In an ETF this doesn’t happen because the withdrawal mechanism is different.

An investor who wants to withdraw from an ETF simply sells their units on ASX where they are purchased by other investors or an ‘Authorised Participant’. Only Authorised Participants may withdraw (redeem) from the ETF. If they do, the capital gains created by the withdrawal can (and will) be passed to the Authorised Participant rather than being left behind for remaining investors. The ETF therefore protects investors from the impact of redemptions by other investors.

Those who have had a bad tax experience with an unlisted managed fund will understand. An ETF won’t hit you with a large taxable distribution the way an unlisted actively managed fund can do due to client redemptions.

This tax efficiency is often an overlooked benefit of investing ETFs.

Gift 2 – Passive management and less trading

Passive ETFs hold a portfolio of shares or other assets that track an index. As a passive ETF’s portfolio is automatically determined by the rules of the index, its portfolio only changes when the index changes. The contrast to this is actively managed funds where the fund manager picks the shares that they think are going to perform the best.

The tax problem with the active management process is that it causes a lot of shares to be sold each year, whereas the index fund process generally does not. The more shares that are sold by the active fund manager in a year, the higher the investor’s capital gains tax liability for that year. This brings forward capital gains. 

To summarise:

  1. ETFs are generally a tax efficient investment vehicle because they minimise exposure to capital gains tax when other investors redeem.
  2. As passive funds, ETFs typically have low turnover and therefore generate lower levels of capital gains tax compared to actively managed funds.

AMIT and TOFA

For more tax details on AMIT (Attributed Managed Investment Trust) and TOFA (Taxation of financial arrangements), see Avoiding tax time dinosaurs.

While AMIT can be used to smooth income payments, the TOFA hedging rules smooth the tax liabilities for investors in a fund that hedges its currency exposure. Without it, currency hedging can lead to tax shocks.

 

Michael Brown is Finance Director at VanEck, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This is general information only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from VanEck, click here.

We outline tax advantages in The Tax Advantages of ETFs which can be found on the ETF education page.

 

  •   20 July 2022
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
k28945
July 20, 2022

Feels like the tax efficiency must be more complicated than described here. There were come chunky capital gains included in distributions of some of the broad index ETFs for the June quarter. For example, in the case of SYI, 27% of the distribution is made up of franked dividends, and virtually all of the rest – 72% – is capital gains!! Even for the broad index tracker STW, 55% of the distribution is franked dividends, but 37% is capital gains (the rest is rats and mice).

Mark Bennett
July 20, 2022

I disagree with the comments in 'gift 1'. It is true that a retail investor may well sell their units to a market maker but market makers do not want to hold many units for much time, hence they will redeem the units via the RE and this will have the same impact as any redemption for a managed funds. Some structures, such as managed accounts, avoid this problem but ETFs whether active or passive do not. In terms of your gift 2, there are a number of actively managed ETFs [or ETMFs if that term is preferred] that have low portfolio turnover and hence distribute small amounts of capital gains, some have carried forward capital losses [often as a result or accepting buy backs rich with franking credits] so perhaps investors should consider both of these factors. If this is of importance to the investor, perhaps consider EIGA which has low turnover and carried forward tax losses.

Michael Brown
July 20, 2022

Thanks for reading my column. ETFs do indeed avoid this problem. When the market maker redeems, the ETF streams to the market maker any capital gains that are realised. So the capital gains tax impact that would otherwise fall on the remaining investors is removed.

It is true that managed accounts also avoid this problem. That said, it is very difficult though to administer portfolios of international equities or bonds through a managed account.

Chris
July 27, 2022

I can certainly confirm this was the case with a certain unlisted Colonial fund this year. Over 2022 the value of the investment decreased by 30% (including all distributions reinvested), yet still received a taxable distribution of about 30%. So no cash received, loss of 30% capital value and a tax bill. 

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Is there a better way to reform the CGT discount?

Taking from the young, giving to the old

Clearing up confusion on how franking credits work

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

Lithium's rally is real this time – but no-one trusts it

The lithium rally mirrors the early-2010s tech stock surge, with demand set to double by 2030. Supply has been slow to respond, creating a market deficit for future tech like humanoid robotics and solid-state batteries.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 662 with weekend update

The debate over the budget is increasingly shaped by frustration and perceptions of unfairness, rather than clear-eyed assessment of policy outcomes.

How inflation is quietly moving the goalposts on retirement

Inflation doesn’t just raise today’s bills - it quietly increases the amount needed to retire, while simultaneously making it harder to save. Three steps to take before June 30th to improve retirement outcomes.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

Planning

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Taxation

Income tax and bracket creep

Examining how five "tax cuts" stack up against bracket creep. Why offsets and incremental changes may do little to ease rising average tax burdens, compared to structural reform through indexation over time.  

Exchange traded products

The limits of a quality investing approach in Australia

Quality strategies shine globally, but Australia's concentrated market tells a different story. Limited diversification and sector dominance can constrain the defensive outcomes investors have seen in broader markets.

Investment strategies

Balancing opportunity and complexity

As private markets expand, investors face a growing mix of structures, a stabilising private equity cycle and uneven AI disruption. Fresh questions are being raised about where the real opportunities now sit.

Investment strategies

Why strong returns matter as much as generosity

As EOFY approaches, structured giving offers a tax-effective way to support charities, while allowing donations to grow over time and play a longer-term role in family wealth and legacy planning outcomes.

Investment strategies

The most important investment decision you’ll ever make

Stock picking often gets the spotlight, but research shows asset allocation explains the vast majority of long‑term returns. Understanding your mix of growth and defensive assets is the real key to investment success.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.