Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 240

Volatility and reflecting on the inflection

Initial selling during a heavy share market fall has nothing to do with valuations, and that is why it is always difficult to judge the extent of any short-term correction. With a bit of space from the immediate ructions of last week, what did it tell us about the long-term position of debt and equity markets?

Finally, a reaction to rising rates

Having watched this sort of thing far more than I’d like, my summary is this: it was an interesting but not unexpected week with a technical adjustment in markets. It was investors finally reacting to the fact that interest rates are adjusting to the reality of stronger economic growth and a US central bank that has begun the process of removing excess liquidity from the system.

Eighteen months ago, I thought that we had turned a corner not yet recognised by the broader market. Interest rates had inflected. Few people thought the same, particularly given the lack of wages growth in the US and the fact that interest rates were still negative in parts of Europe.

Scaling the wall of Fed money

The Federal Reserve monetary base since 1950

In September 2016, I expressed a view in our quarterly report that investors should note how abnormally low rates are (and remain so now) and not to allow the gyrations of the market to hide the fact that the tide may be changing. We thought the inflection point had occurred in July 2016 and there would be a different set of long-term opportunities in future.

Our expectation was that economic growth and earnings would be better than expected and the short-term price action risk would now more likely come from inflation scares and subsequent upward moves in interest rates.

Between then and now, we have invested based on our belief that markets were underestimating how tight labour markets were, with the most common complaint from CEOs in the US being the inability to find workers. Coupled with the passage of Trump’s tax cuts late last year, which in theory will create significant pent up demand, interest rate markets have noticed that the inflection point had already been reached.

Flow into bonds at the expense of equities

However, investors (particularly passive ones) have been still piling into bonds at the expense of equities.

Until recently, the lack of wage growth was still a popular theme. This was looking in the rear-view mirror. Then we saw the strongest year-on-year increase in US wages for some time and market sentiment turned on its head and interest rates appeared to trigger a technical reaction in equity markets.

I suspect it is simply further confirmation that excess liquidity is starting to leave the system, the most high-profile examples being through VIX funds and even Bitcoin. Investment opportunities will now be in those companies that can grow their earnings, as opposed to those that historically benefited from a re-rating on the back of lower interest rates.

Investment opportunities, but with some cash caution

Many forecast valuation multiples seem reasonable. As examples, home builders are trading at less than 10x forecast earnings, banks and alternative asset managers at 10-12x and Pfizer is 11x. Over 50% of our global portfolio is on an average price to earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 11. Other large sectors and stocks, as monopolistic and high growth businesses like the financial exchanges, Mastercard, Visa and Google range in P/E ratios from 18-24x, which seem reasonable for the nature of their businesses. We believe these types of businesses will give a satisfactory return in a general market environment of lower returns and choppier price action.

With last week’s pullback in the market, we marginally reduced some of our futures hedges, closed out short REIT positions and will, in all likelihood, marginally increase some of our existing positions. This will be done within an overall framework that interest rates have inflected, markets have done well, and an invested position of approximately 85-90% is prudent.

 

Paul Moore is Chief Investment Officer at PM Capital. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

RELATED ARTICLES

The markets to gain most from US rate cuts

The tortoise wins in investing

Will the RBA cut rates before the Fed?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.