Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 509

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 509 with weekend update

  •   18 May 2023
  • 28
  •      
  •   

The Weekend Edition includes a market update plus Morningstar adds links to two additional articles.

Although commonly attributed to Winston Churchill, he was not the first to say the famous words:

“Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.”

What he did say (on 11 November 1947) is similar but more expansive:

"Many forms of government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time …’

Despite the extraordinary achievements and progress of billions of people over centuries, we have not improved on a system of government which involves a person walking into a polling booth every few years and marking a box for a preferred candidate. Democracy comes with troublesome flaws such as media influence, lobbyist access to politicians for favours, backroom deals, party politics and faulty personalities, but theocracy, autocracy or oligarchy are worse. 

Democracy is dysfunctional but we have not come up with anything better.

Monetary policy is the same. It is flawed in its application but we have not devised an improvement, such that our central bank's attempts to fulfill its responsibilities under the Reserve Bank Act are blunt and imprecise. The Act says:

"Its duty is to contribute to the stability of the currency, full employment, and the economic prosperity and welfare of the Australian people."

Look up 'monetary policy' on the Reserve Bank's website and it says:

"The Reserve Bank is responsible for Australia's monetary policy. Monetary policy involves setting the interest rate on overnight loans in the money market (‘the cash rate’)."

That's mainly it. The cash rate, plus some activities on money supply. To contribute to the prosperity of the Australian people, the central bank weapon of choice is setting the cash rate. Consider some way this fails:

1. There are about 10 million households in Australia (ABS 2022) but only one-third of them have a mortgage. Most people are not hit by higher mortgage payments, yet that is the primary inflation control mechanism.

2. Increasing the cash rate stimulates the economy by boosting the nominal incomes of millions of Australians through higher term deposit and bond rates. If anyone argues it is not stimulatory because the older people who are the savers do not spend as much as younger people, consider this:

3. Fiscal policy often works in the opposite direction, as governments give cost-of-living relief when inflation rises, putting money into pockets when the central bank is trying to take it out.

4. The cash rate increase does not directly hit borrowers. It relies on the 'transmission mechanism' into bank lending rates before repayments are hiked. Banks lent billions on long-term fixed rates which are maturing over 2023 and into 2024, such that the impact on borrowers feeds slowly into the system but then hits severely.   

5. Monetary policy is primarily demand-side economic management. It aims to expand or contract economic activity by controlling the cost of money. But in the current cycle, inflation is significantly driven by supply-side factors, such as Russia's war in Ukraine, the pandemic's impact on supply chains and natural disasters in Australia. None of which are sensitive to interest rate changes.

6. Rising cash rates feed into parts of the inflation calculation, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), generating an updraft. The Australian Bureau of Statistics advises:

"Housing is the highest weighted group in the CPI, accounting for around one quarter of the basket. It includes new dwellings purchased by owner occupiers (houses, townhouses and apartments), rents and major renovations."

Consider how supply shortages have driven up inflation, contributed to a decline in construction and rising rents. Says Bill Mitchell, Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity at the University of Newcastle:

"So we enter a ridiculous circularity. The RBA hikes interest rates. Rental inflation accelerates even though the other factors driving the overall CPI inflation trajectory are in decline. The RBA then claims the CPI inflation is not falling fast enough. The RBA hikes again … Rinse and repeat."

Borrowers who can least afford higher repayments are hit the most. Its doubtful they feel an increase in the cash rate 11 times in a year from 0.1% to 3.85% has improved "the economic prosperity and welfare of the Australian people".

The Reserve Bank and Governor Philip Lowe are acutely aware of the mental health implications of rising rates, and the Governor has made a point of meeting with suicide prevention agencies. The May 2023 Statement of Monetary Policy (page 32) includes this acknowledgement:

"Community services organisations have raised concerns regarding the sharp increase in demand for their services over recent quarters, including for financial aid, domestic violence and acute mental health support, food bank services and housing assistance. They note that there has been a rise in the number of people seeking assistance for the first time, including renters and people with mortgages."

A policy which causes severe mental health problems for strugglers but puts more money in the hands of wealthy savers is a deficient way to control inflation. The Reserve Bank acted the worst when leaving the economic stimulus of 'whatever it takes' in 2021 as inflation was already taking hold. It poured fuel on the fire when it should have withdrawn oxygen.

Of course, Australia's central bank was not alone, and this week, we publish a short extract from famous fund manager Stanley Druckenmiller's recent interview at the Sohn Conference 2023 in the US where he says of the Federal Reserve's actions a year ago:

"Then realising they have probably made the biggest mistake in the history of the Fed, they slammed on the brakes. They raised rates 500 basis points (5%) in the last year."

“I’m sitting here staring in the face of the biggest and probably the broadest asset bubble, forget that I’ve ever seen, but that I’ve ever studied.”

"If we get a hard landing, there will be unbelievable opportunities, and I don't want to miss those opportunities by blowing my money now and having some 20-30% loss where my head is all screwed up when those opportunities present themselves."

The Federal Reserve Act was signed into law in 1913, about 110 years ago, and for a leading voice in US investing to call the extremely loose monetary policy of 2021 "probably made the biggest mistake in the history of the Fed" is quite a claim. 

This week's wage price index showed a rise at a decade-high 3.7% in the year to March 2023, and 0.8% for the quarter, both in line with expectations. After the release of the Reserve Bank minutes on Tuesday, CBA's Gareth Aird confirmed:

"Our central scenario puts the current 3.85% as the peak in the cash rate, while the near-term risk sits with another rate hike ... We continue to expect 50bp of rate cuts in Q4 23 and a further 75bp of easing in 2024 that would take the cash rate to 2.6% - a more neutral setting."

***

CBA has a new hybrid in the market, expected to list as CBAPM with an indicative margin of 3% to 3.2% and issue size of $750 million. The Bank will be swamped by demand, given the Bank Bill Rate is now about 3.9%. NAB economists came out this week expecting one or two more cash rate increases. Either way, a gross return of about 7% on CBA is a decent reward for the risk of hybrids. This chart courtesy of BondAdviser shows the relative value and extra return for longer term.

***

As 30 June is six weeks away, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has advised its three focus areas for this tax period:

  • rental property deductions
  • work-related expenses
  • capital gains tax.

The ATO is especially critical of rental property owners:

"The ATO’s review of income tax returns show 9 in 10 rental property owners are getting their return wrong, and often sees rental income being left out, or mistakes being made with property related deductions – like overclaiming expenses or claiming for improvements to private properties."

The ATO has sophisticated data matching capabilities, and warns:

"Don’t fall into the trap of thinking we won’t notice if you sell an asset for a gain and don’t declare it ... Don’t bury your head in the sand."

***

In the time-honoured tradition of the Commencement Speech loved by US universities, Bill Gates gave the 2023 version to North Arizona students last week. As Gates says, he never actually graduated from any university, as he left Harvard after three semesters to start Microsoft. He's done well regardless. The advice he shared is worth a quick read, making these five points:

  1. Your life isn’t a one-act play.
  2. You’re never too smart to be confused.
  3. Gravitate toward work that solves an important problem.
  4. Don’t underestimate the power of friendship.
  5. You’re not a slacker if you cut yourself some slack.

***

Buy-Write funds have been available to retail and wholesale investors in Australia for many years - I worked on the design of one at Colonial First State about 20 years ago - but they are becoming more common, including many ETFs. Several new funds have launched on the ASX and Cboe listed exchanges in recent months. How do they work and do they suit the current market conditions?

Graham Hand

Also in this week's edition ...

The Quality of Advice Review has once gain shone a spotlight on the escalating costs of financial advice. While there have been a lot of vague statements about advice fees, they've been few specifics on the actual costs involved. Anne-Marie Esler from Padua Solutions breaks down the fees for us. She notes that while costs are skyrocketing, demand for financial advice remains strong.

Nicholas Paul of MFS Investment Management hails the cheapest global small cap valuations seen in decades. He says there are similarities between the market set-up today and that of the early 2000s, after which small caps beat large caps handsomely over the next eight years.  

Look up any reputable finance book and you're likely to see a statement about how bonds offer lower returns than stocks although with less risk. Andrew Mitchell of Ophir Asset Management takes issue with the latter. He says that while it may be true in the short term, it isn't over longer-time horizons, with important implications for asset allocation.

The charge towards net-zero emissions is a US$50 trillion global opportunity over the next 30 years, according to Munro Partners' James Tsinidis. James gives us three themes and one stock that should benefit from the climate transition.

Professional money managers have many advantages over individual investors: more information, greater access to company management, as well as staff to help them. Yet they also have some constraints, and it's here James Gruber suggests that individuals can potentially compete with the best in the business.

Two extra articles from Morningstar for the weekend. Joshua Peach reports on an ASX blue chip that is undervalued for the first time in almost three years, while Leslie Norton looks at Tesla's key-person risks

And in this week's white paper, Orbis Investments seeks to debunk three oft-repeated myths about value investing with hard data and considered analysis.

***

Weekend market update

On Friday in the US, stocks finished marginally down to conclude another banner week for the bulls with 1.5% and 3.6% gains for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 respectively. Treasurys traded weaker once more, with the policy-sensitive two-year yield rising to 4.28% from 4.24% yesterday and the long bond likewise increasing four basis points to 3.95%. Gold bounced to US$1,978 an ounce, WTI crude remained near US$72 a barrel, and the VIX edged higher towards 17.

From AAP Netdesk:

The local share market gained ground on Friday for a second straight day amid optimism over both the state of the global economy and talks to raise the US debt ceiling.

The benchmark S&P/ASX200 index closed Friday up 42.7 points, or 0.59%, at 7,279.5, in its highest close since May 5. The broader All Ordinaries gained 44.5 points, or 0.6%, at 7,471.5.

The ASX tech sector was the biggest gainer on Friday, climbing 2.2% after a strong session on the Nasdaq. Xero advanced another 5.4% to an over one-year high of $108 following Thursday's strong earnings report, while Wisetech Global rose 0.7% to $71.20.

Financials were the second-best performer, collectively climbing 1.5% as all of the Big Four retail banks had a solid day.

ANZ rose 1.4% to $23.97, Westpac climbed 1.3% to $21.23, CBA added 1.8% to $99.80, and NAB advanced 1.5% to $26.80.

Insurance companies performed even better, with IAG climbing 4.6% to $5.19 and Suncorp rising 1.9% to $12.62.

The heavyweight mining sector was mostly in the red, however, with losses for both iron ore miners and goldminers. BHP fell 0.2% to $44.16, Rio Tinto dropped 0.5% to $109.42, and Fortescue Metals was basically flat at $20.52, while in the gold sector Newcrest dropped 1% to $13.31 and Evolution fell 1.6% to $3.72.

Elsewhere, Austal had soared 25.1% to a five-month high of $1.995 after the Tasmanian shipbuilder's US subsidiary was awarded a new contract worth up to $3.2 billion to design and potentially build seven new surveillance ships for the US Navy.

From Shane Oliver, AMP:

Global share markets rose over the last week. Over the week Eurozone shares rose 1.3%, Japanese shares rose 4.8% to their highest since 1990, and Chinese shares rose 0.2%. Supported by the positive global lead Australian shares rose by 0.3% with gains in IT and resources shares offsetting weakness in retailers, health and property stocks. However, bond yields rose globally and in Australia, with the local money market now pricing in the RBA holding in June but a 64% probability of another 0.25% RBA rate hike by September. Oil and iron ore prices rose but metal prices were flat to down. The $A was little changed as the $US rose.

While shares could have a further tactical bounce if there is quick US debt ceiling deal, they continue to look vulnerable over the next few months. From their lows last year global and US shares are up 17% and Australian shares are up 13% as investors have been buoyed by evidence of peaking inflation, anticipation that central banks are near the top, and so far resilient growth and profits.

However, we remain of the view that global and Australian share markets are vulnerable to a rougher period ahead: share market gains so far have been narrowly based favouring defensive sectors than would be normal at this point in a recovery; US debt ceiling brinkmanship and eventual resolution could create volatility ahead; banking stress is continuing in fits and starts in the US resulting in additional monetary tightening; leading economic indicators continue to point to a high risk of recession in the US and Australia; China’s recovery is looking less robust; metal and energy prices have softened with oil down despite several OPEC supply cuts suggesting weakening demand; central banks are probably close to the top but risk doing more; and the period from May to September is often rough for shares.

We remain of the view that shares will do okay on a 12-month view as central banks ease up but the next few months are likely to be rough.

Curated by James Gruber and Leisa Bell

 

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

ETF Quarterly Report from Vanguard

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Monthly Bond and Hybrid updates from ASX

Listed Investment Company (LIC) Indicative NTA Report from Bell Potter

LIC Quarterly Report from Bell Potter

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 

28 Comments
Ruth
May 25, 2023

It was the ancient Greeks who said that the best form of government is a benevolent dictatorship, but since this cannot be guaranteed, democracy is our next best choice. It works well in small countries, with Switzerland being the leading example, relatively neutral still, with the cantons still small enough to exert an opinion via their vote and its central government kept small. It does not work in large populations where the Federal Government has most power, promising gifts that are funded by the taxpayer.

Mark Hayden
May 24, 2023

Graham, I challenge the inference that monetary policy is about mortgagees. It is only partially about ensuring less disposable income for them. It is also about slowing the economy including businesses that borrow. The references about the greatest asset bubble is interesting. Another topic to ask economists and others is the level of interest rates in the long term - should it be slightly above expected long term inflation?

Michael P
May 24, 2023

Hi Firstlinks team
Would it be possible to a deep dive/white paper on 'hedged' managed funds, how they should be evaluated and the actual impact for investors ? Financial Advisers often present 2 versions of a fund, one hedged and one unhedged, and often invest in both. However it is very difficult to get a clear answer on i) the additional cost to the fund of undertaking hedging ii) the comparative risk/return figures for the 2 funds iii) the actual/historical level of hedging within the fund and the impact v) whether individual trades/positions are hedged vs specific currencies being hedged across the fund etc. Based on my limited knowledge of FX, hedging beyond 12 months is problematic, so I have a hypothesis that the value of any hedging ebbs away to be of no value over say a 5 year period. PDSs for hedged managed funds typically provide no detail and are essentially useless on these points.

Any guidance you could provide on this would be very helpful. If good guidance already exists, please let me know.

Note : I am specifically NOT talking about 'hedge funds', but am focused on normal managed funds which claim to undertake 'hedging'.

Warren Bird
May 24, 2023

This might be a start Michael P. I wrote it a while ago.

https://www.firstlinks.com.au/managing-foreign-exchange-risk

John
May 21, 2023

Give the RBA the power to adjust the GST above the pre-determined level (currently 10%). This would affect everybody, not just those with mortgages or loans, and in direct proportion to their spending habits. Interest rates could remain untouched which would be good for both government and private debt liabilities. An increase in GST would have a temporary inflation affect but would reduce demand. Future removal of the GST increase would be stimulatory while at the same time reduce the CPI. The additional GST revenue would go to the Federal Govt and help cover CPI increases to pensions etc. with the balance going to pay off debt.

BRUCE
May 21, 2023

Graham, A very interesting article thank you. Unfortunately it is spoiled by the references to “wealthy savers” on page 2 under the comment on the RBA. Somehow the generation that saved for their retirement so as to avoid being a burden to either the public purse or their children,are consistently insulted by the press by such derogatory descriptions. Just because you have sufficient capital to support yourself for the next 10/ 20 years, because you have no other income sources, does not make you ‘wealthy’ nor does having paid off your mortgage before taking your first overseas holiday and then saving in priority to spending throughout your optimal income earning years. It’s one thing for the ignorant daily press to use this adjective to soften up the public for more taxes on super and inheritance but it’s disappointing when someone with your expertise uses it. Cheers

john
May 22, 2023

Hear, Hear !!

Steve
May 20, 2023

Economics isn't called the Dismal Science for nothing. Science is by definition a rational structure, but economics is dominated by emotion (fear/greed etc). Not rational! It is impossible to manage the collective emotion of a community but we expect miracles from our leaders (politicians and RBA types). It seems a tad having it both ways to say that the loose monetary policy was clearly going to cause inflation, but then say how poor interest rates are as a tool to lower inflation. It works by causing a bit of pain (moving from greed to fear). Our friends in the media are always looking for a scare angle and as Covid became less scary, shock, horror we now get Cost of Living Crisis. Why always "Crisis"? As you said many people are doing OK (those without a large mortgage; retirees getting more on their savings etc) but the focus is always on the person in the worst circumstances (there is always someone) and extrapolate to the whole of society.
The by far biggest problem re the housing situation is lack of supply, but every "solution" offered tends to throw fuel on the fire by giving people more money (eg early access to Super) to simply bid up prices. Which is why the demand side approach of monetary policy is needed.
For the academics out there, why is monetary policy having a similar effect in counties such as the US where most mortgages are fixed for 30 years? Personally I don't know why we can't move towards more long-dated fixed mortgages here as well. At least then you know exactly what you are letting yourself in for when you take out a mortgage. Loans are one of the few purchases where the price can change after the initial purchase. Surely the govt and RBA would like a system that is less likely to create anger towards them?

Allan
May 19, 2023

"Democracy" as a malingering misnomer is a real doozy of a demonstrative dupe, dressed fit-to-kill, and "..except for all the others." really means all of the powerless plebs (read as: the 'demos') who lamentably lack the 'kratos'. If folk can truly be said to have any power then it always acts assiduously in arrears when but the next election obtains years and tears later, providing them with the opportunity to once yet again (n.b. nothing to gain here) throw good money after bad, because when they tick the boxes on the ballot forms they are merely providing whichever political party that then gets to don(key-around with) the governmental guernsey, an indelibly-indenturing IOU.

Gary Judd
May 19, 2023

It is a great article.

Graham is right that we have not devised an improvement for the application of monetary policy. That failure is because monetary policy is about manipulation of the money supply by a few human beings.

When, in seeking to manipulate the money supply. central banks get it wrong, the community pays the price, disproportionately the less well off. It is only by good luck that they can get it right because they (a) are not omniscient, and (b) cannot control human behavior. So, most of the time they get it wrong.

Since time immemorial governments have sought to manipulate the money supply. Debasing the currency (cutting down the precious metals in the coins), the accompanying hyper-inflation and soaring taxes are generally regarded as a significant cause of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, for example.

Today, it's done by "monetary policy" through the agency of central banks. The system is inherently flawed and cannot be fixed. The only way to deal with the problem is to change the system to one where the money supply is not decided by the government or a few policy makers.










Dudley
May 19, 2023

"change the system to one where the money supply is not decided by the government or a few policy makers":

Actually, money supply is decided by savers leaving cash on deposit or in pocket.

In the current system, RBA decides how much interest they will pay on banks deposits with the RBA which sets the competitive rate for overnight money.

Economist
May 24, 2023

No Dudley, money is created by banks. When they lend it creates the deposits in the system. Money is measured by deposits, but that doesn't mean deposits create themselves.

James
May 24, 2023

" money is created by banks"

Strange, I thought governments printed/created money!
Banks merely borrow it from others, pay for it ,and re-loan it and make a profit on the difference, as well as charging fees for everything!

Economist
May 24, 2023

James you need to study economics. Even in high school.in the 1970s I learned that credit creation results from bank lending and it was confirmed in advanced macro at University.
Governments do not create money. They run fiscal policy and there is nothing that automatically turns a deficit into money supply growth.

James
May 24, 2023

Fair enough. Thanks for the enlightenment!

Dudley
May 24, 2023

"No Dudley, money is created by banks. When they lend it creates the deposits in the system. Money is measured by deposits, but that doesn't mean deposits create themselves.":

Money is created when an asset owner pawns an asset [such as a prospective wage or a house]. The money created that is left on deposit in banks is most easily counted when banks report it.

Economist
May 25, 2023

Dudley, I'm sorry but that just isn't how it works. The "asset owner" you refer to merely transfers something that already exists to someone else. That does not create money. The purchaser takes funds out of deposits and the seller puts it in. The money supply doesn't change.
Only banks can create new deposits when the proceeds of their lending are put on deposit. Every economist knows this. Please read this from the Bank of England. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/quarterly-bulletin/2014/q1/money-creation-in-the-modern-economy

Dudley
May 25, 2023

"Only banks can create new deposits when the proceeds of their lending are put on deposit.":

Which bank loans into a vacuum? No loans without a pawnor.

David
May 22, 2023

A return to gold money as existed before 1933 would be a good start. Not so easy to manipulate and self correcting against inflation. What's not to like? In spite of the prophecy by Keynes, world gold production has kept up with human population increase. The period from 1933 to now should be looked at as an aberration in monetary history. With Australia being one of the major producers, we should be a in a good position to actually do it. Who would be the losers? The RBA for one, I assume.

Mystery man jack
May 18, 2023

Fascinating chart, the Boomers holding up the economy, but how does the ABS know the "Real Household Consumption by age of the reference person". How do they know how much I spend and the age of me as reference person in the household? It can't be census data because the chart varies every year but the census is every five years. And what if i buy a new car or go on an overseas trip one year, how does anyone know?

Neil
May 18, 2023

“There are about 10 million households in Australia (ABS 2022) but only one-third of them have a mortgage. Most people are not hit by higher mortgage payments, yet that is the primary inflation control mechanism.”

The RBA’s cash rate is the reference rate that all financial institutions in Australia use to set their domestic lending rates (of course international-source funds will have a weighted average effect on the final rate offered to a borrower). Those loans could be to consumers (car loans, credit cards, BNPL, etc), businesses or other institutions. As those interest rates rise, consumers will be left with less in their pocket, and business costs will increase necessitating price rises (where the market allows, redundancies where it doesn’t), leaving even less in the consumers’ pockets.
So focussing only on how many people have residential property mortgages perhaps is not seeing the forest for the trees?

Michael
May 21, 2023

Neil is correct and his comment and highlights the deficiency in the article. Investment will also decline with higher interest rates as well as consumption. In addition there are foreign exchange impacts. At the macro level the RBA has become a politically convenient scapegoat and current "group think" is prevailing over analysis . More focus on outcomes including comparitive outcomes with US, Canada, UK, and Europe over the last twenty years, rather than one comment made by the Governor, may provide better balance . There has been significant media commentary on the macro level (relating to the unemployment rate being too high) on low growth in real wages, but little on the micro level. An important component of wage growth is productivity growth. Quoting the Parliamentary Library "Policies to boost productivity growth include: labour market reforms; more skills training; ongoing high levels of infrastructure spending; increased housing supply; competition reforms; measures to boost innovation; climate policy certainty; deregulation; and tax reform" None of these measures are controlled by the RBA.

Ted Kramer
May 18, 2023

Great article
The NSW HSC Economics Syllabus suggests that there are many macro and micro strategies that could be used to control inflation, besides monetary policy. Many address the supply side, eg energy. Students would fail exams by just writing about monetary policy as a means to control inflation.
The mistakes made in both fiscal and monetary policy in 2020 and 2021 in Australia and the USA must have had elections in mind. Democracy at work, influencing the governors' of our independent central banks...if they wanted to keep their job?

Russell (a veteran adviser)
May 18, 2023

The headline says monetary policy is the best worst solution, you then go on to argue rightly why it fails. The RBA is not and should not be all-powerful, much less "independent". Monetary policy hegemony did not dominate policymaking prior to the 1980s, and has failed to deliver, over and over. Keynes, Kalecki and others promoted more extensive use of fiscal policy, along with more regulations to restrict speculative lending, with the objective of economic stability at non-inflationary full-employment. Set the cash rate at or near zero and have the Treasury issue bonds to the RBA. Leave excess reserves in the banking system. Forget the fictitious NAIRU. The first step in change is for the Treasurer to acknowledge that Australia has a high degree of monetary sovereignty, and the currency issuer is NOT reliant on taxation receipts to fund its spending. It is the other way around. Australia's constraints on spending are inflation caused by the lack of (and limits on) resources. They are not fiscal. More Bill Mitchell please!

Former Treasury policy maker
May 18, 2023

Actually it (monetary policy) has delivered on spades until the last couple of years when it's had to be operated under highly unusual circumstances of a global pandemic!

Graham Hand
May 18, 2023

Hi Russell, we are keen to publish more Bill Mitchell but he will only give permission to publish a short intro to his content then link to his website for the rest. That is not how we and most publishers work. We will link to the source but we want to give our readers the full article on our website.

Dudley
May 18, 2023

Banks to pay RBA $82.899 billion for Term Funding Facility bonds maturing between 2023/04/07 and 2023/10/14.

$100 billion more by 2026/04/05.

Monetary Policy Operations – Current – A3:
https://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/tables/xls/a03.xls?v=2023-05-18-10-27-36
Term Funding Facility

Will banks be in market for deposits to replace TFF bonds?

Dudley
May 20, 2023

" the majors’ issuance needs could eventually decline to as little as $89 billion a year as the demand for savings climbs while loan growth deteriorates":
https://www.afr.com/wealth/personal-finance/rba-has-trick-up-its-sleeve-that-could-avoid-much-higher-rates-20230517-p5d93i

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

2024/25 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ATO has released all the superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2024. Here's what’s changing and what’s not, and some key considerations and opportunities in the lead up to 30 June and beyond.

The greatest investor you’ve never heard of

Jim Simons has achieved breathtaking returns of 62% p.a. over 33 years, a track record like no other, yet he remains little known to the public. Here’s how he’s done it, and the lessons that can be applied to our own investing.

Five months on from cancer diagnosis

Life has radically shifted with my brain cancer, and I don’t know if it will ever be the same again. After decades of writing and a dozen years with Firstlinks, I still want to contribute, but exactly how and when I do that is unclear.

Is Australia ready for its population growth over the next decade?

Australia will have 3.7 million more people in a decade's time, though the growth won't be evenly distributed. Over 85s will see the fastest growth, while the number of younger people will barely rise. 

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 552 with weekend update

Being rich is having a high-paying job and accumulating fancy houses and cars, while being wealthy is owning assets that provide passive income, as well as freedom and flexibility. Knowing the difference can reframe your life.

  • 21 March 2024

Why LICs may be close to bottoming

Investor disgust, consolidation, de-listings, price discounts, activist investors entering - it’s what typically happens at business cycle troughs, and it’s happening to LICs now. That may present a potential opportunity.

Latest Updates

Shares

20 US stocks to buy and hold forever

Recently, I compiled a list of ASX stocks that you could buy and hold forever. Here’s a follow-up list of US stocks that you could own indefinitely, including well-known names like Microsoft, as well as lesser-known gems.

The public servants demanding $3m super tax exemption

The $3 million super tax will capture retired, and soon to retire, public servants and politicians who are members of defined benefit superannuation schemes. Lobbying efforts for exemptions to the tax are intensifying.

Property

Baby Boomer housing needs

Baby boomers will account for a third of population growth between 2024 and 2029, making this generation the biggest age-related growth sector over this period. They will shape the housing market with their unique preferences.

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: When the first member of a couple dies

The surviving spouse has a lot to think about when a member of an SMSF dies. While it pays to understand the options quickly, often they’re best served by moving a little more slowly before making final decisions.

Shares

Small caps are compelling but not for the reasons you might think...

Your author prematurely advocated investing in small caps almost 12 months ago. Since then, the investment landscape has changed, and there are even more reasons to believe small caps are likely to outperform going forward.

Taxation

The mixed fortunes of tax reform in Australia, part 2

Since Federation, reforms to our tax system have proven difficult. Yet they're too important to leave in the too-hard basket, and here's a look at the key ingredients that make a tax reform exercise work, or not.

Investment strategies

8 ways that AI will impact how we invest

AI is affecting ever expanding fields of human activity, and the way we invest is no exception. Here's how investors, advisors and investment managers can better prepare to manage the opportunities and risks that come with AI.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.