Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 509

Druckenmiller on the biggest mistake in the history of the Fed

At the 2023 Sohn Investment Conference in the US on 9 May 2023, Duquesne Family Office CEO Stanley Druckenmiller spoke about the US Federal Reserve’s actions in the last two years and its impact on investing conditions. The entire interview went for over an hour, but we have selected these highlights.

***

I (recently) read Edward Chancellor's The Price of Time. As you know, I've been saying for years that my observation was the worst economic outcomes tended to follow asset bubbles. I was only looking at the past 100 years or so. Chancellor's book is a real tour-de-force, and it describes how this has been going on for over 500 years. Basically, every time we've had interest rates below 2% going back 500 years, it's been followed with a difficult economic time.

I think it was actually just a little over two years ago, I went on national television and said we had monetary policy that was the most reckless and extreme relative of the economic circumstances I had ever seen. And at that time, inflation was 2.5%. You had a booming economy, we're coming out post-COVID and it was clear post-vaccines that we were on our way to maybe the most rapid recovery I have seen in my lifetime.

I was not surprised about a year later when inflation reached 9%. I was not surprised that SPACs went crazy, Bitcoin went crazy, Dogecoin went crazy, equities went crazy. What I was surprised by was that for the next year, while all that happened, Jerome Powell’s Fed (Federal Reserve, the US central bank) continued to have their foot on the gas, they continued to buy US$120 billion of bonds a month while rates were zero. This obviously led to everything I just described.

Then realising they have probably made the biggest mistake in the history of the Fed, they slammed on the brakes. They raised rates 500 basis points (5%) in the last year. We know historically, two things happen.

Number one, the worst economic outcomes tend to follow too easily-engineered asset bubbles. And number two, big maxim in my business is Don't Fight the Fed.

So I'm sitting here staring in the face at the biggest asset and probably the broadest asset bubble - forget that I've ever seen that I've ever studied - and it went on for 10 or 11 years and then as the grand finale the government spent US$5 trillion on COVID and the Fed financed 60% of it.

(Editor note: As an example of a broad asset bubble, consider this chart, sourced from Multpl, of the S&P500 Price to Book Value ratio. It has only been higher in this period during the dotcom era of 2000 and the Fed-induced free money and loose monetary policy until 2022. Book value is the company's value in its financial accounts determined by subtracting its liabilities from the value of its assets. This exuberance comes at a time of rising interest rates, recession threats and tightening of bank lending).

As I just described, now we have a big hike in interest rates. It's hard to look at that constellation of factors, know that we've only had a few soft landings since 1950 and all of them were preceded by what I would call proactive rather than reactive Fed policy, and believe we're going to have a soft landing. One never knows. But if you're just looking at the odds, they're very tough. In terms of the timing, I have left much less certainty on that than I do on whether we're going to have a hard landing or a soft landing.

The timing is difficult, but I will say in our shop we tend to use anecdotal information a lot. It's somewhat mixed. Housing, which has tended to lead historically, is actually fairly robust. Travel and restaurants and stuff like that are fairly robust. But trucking, which has been a guiding light for my firm in terms of economic forecasting with a six-to-eight-month lead time, is extremely weak. We're hearing bad anecdotes from retail. The banking problem we always knew.

Given what I've already described, there were going to be bodies out there. When you have free money, people do stupid things. When you have free money for 11 years, people do really stupid things. So the stuff under the hood is starting to emerge. Obviously, the regional banks recently, we had Bed Bath & Beyond. But I would assume there's a lot more bodies coming. The median regional bank has 43% of their loans in commercial real estate, about 40% of that in office. We've had this huge change in lifestyle due to COVID. Number one, the great resignation and number two people aren't going to the office. So we have actually a higher vacancy rate than we had in 2008.

I put all that together and I look also at the inverted yield curve. The timing is sort of third, probably fourth quarter of this year, first quarter of 2024. I wouldn't be surprised if the bean counters a year from now - as they tend to do backward looking - that things started (to go bad) sometime in the second quarter.

 

Stanley Druckenmiller is Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of his Duquesne Family Office. He made his reputation as an astute asset manager from 1988 to 2000 when he was lead portfolio manager for George Soros's Quantum Fund. The full Sohn Conference interview is linked here. This extract is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   17 May 2023
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

The world's about to hit a brick wall

US rate rises would challenge multi-asset diversified portfolios

Central banks have lost the plot

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

Warren Buffett's final lesson

I’ve long seen Buffett as a flawed genius: a great investor though a man with shortcomings. With his final letter to Berkshire shareholders, I reflect on how my views of Buffett have changed and the legacy he leaves.

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

13 ways to save money on your tax - legally

Thoughtful tax planning is a cornerstone of successful investing. This highlights 13 legal ways that you can reduce tax, preserve capital, and enhance long-term wealth across super, property, and shares.

Why it’s time to ditch the retirement journey

Retirement isn’t a clean financial arc. Income shocks, health costs and family pressures hit at random, exposing the limits of age-based planning and the myth of a predictable “retirement journey".

The housing market is heading into choppy waters

With rates on hold and housing demand strong, lenders are pushing boundaries. As risky products return, borrowers should be cautious and not let clever marketing cloud their judgment.

Latest Updates

Interviews

AFIC on the speculative ASX boom, opportunities, and LIC discounts

In an interview with Firstlinks, CEO Mark Freeman discusses how speculative ASX stocks have crushed blue chips this year, companies he likes now, and why he’s confident AFIC’s NTA discount will close.

Investment strategies

Solving the Australian equities conundrum

The ASX's performance this year has again highlighted a persistent riddle facing investors – how to approach an index reliant on a few sectors and handful of stocks. Here are some ideas on how to build a durable portfolio.

Retirement

Regulators warn super funds to lift retirement focus

Despite three years under the retirement income covenant, regulators warn a growing gap between leading and lagging super funds, driven by poor member insights and patchy outcomes measurement.

Shares

Australian equities: a tale of two markets

The ASX seems a market split in two: between the haves and have nots; or those with growth and momentum and those without. In this environment, opportunity favours those willing to look beyond the obvious.

Investment strategies

Dotcom on steroids Part II

OpenAI’s business model isn't sustainable in the long run. If markets catch on, the company could face higher borrowing costs, or worse, and that would have major spillover effects.

Investment strategies

AI’s debt binge draws European telco parallels

‘Hyperscalers’ including Google, Meta and Microsoft are fuelling an unprecedented surge in equity and debt issuance to bankroll massive AI-driven capital expenditure. History shows this isn't without risk.

Investment strategies

Leveraged single stock ETFs don't work as advertised

Leveraged ETFs seek to deliver some multiple of an underlying index or reference asset’s return over a day. Yet, they aren’t even delivering the target return on an average day as they’re meant to do.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.