Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 610

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 610

  •   8 May 2025
  • 7
  •      
  •   

The Federal Election heard the concerns of many younger people that they’re being disadvantaged by Government policies that favour older people over them. A new report suggests they might be right.

Academics from the ANU’s Crawford School of Public Policy have released a paper measuring the way that the tax and transfer system redistributes income between Australians of different ages and how that’s changed in the past three decades.

The paper, Measuring the changing size of intergenerational transfers in the Australian tax and transfer system, has found that the system has been more generous to older Australians than younger ones.

It says government spending on older people, including the age pension, aged care and health care, has increased significantly in real, per-person terms over time. By contrast, net spending on younger households has remained relatively constant.

And the figures aren’t distorted by an ageing population as they’re measured on a per capita basis.

The paper says the increase in transfers to older Australians has happened in a period where older people have also earned significantly more private income, primarily from higher capital income from real estate and superannuation.

It says these two trends have had a significant impact on the nature of our tax and transfer system and income distribution by age. For instance, from 1993/94 to 2002/03, Australians aged over 60 had private income equal to 41% of the income of Australians aged 18 to 60 and average final income (after taxes and transfers) equal to 61% of the income of Australians aged 18 to 60. Yet, in the final ten years of the study, the pre-tax income of Australians aged over 60 was 65% of the population aged 18 to 60, and post-tax income was equal to 95% of their income.

It goes on to suggest that the trend is even more notable when Australians over the age of 60 are compared to those aged 18 to 30. In the past decade, the older cohort has earned an income around 11% higher ($72,000 compared to $64,000 in 2022 dollars). However, the tax and transfer system means that the older group has an average after-tax income 60% higher than the younger group.

What’s behind the trends?

The chart above shows the six main levels of taxes and it’s primarily been personal income tax which has been a key contributor to the growing divide between old and young. The growth in personal income tax has been driven by an increase in real incomes along with the average tax rate on income remaining relatively stable during the period. Numbers for the other taxes haven’t changed as much.

The next chart shows the change in aggregate taxes for different age groups. It reveals that total taxes paid have increased meaningfully for those in the highest earning years. Meanwhile, taxes have also increased for older people but remain low in absolute terms. And taxes paid haven’t risen for the young reflecting the low growth rate in earnings for this group.

The other change has been in Government spending on different age groups.

The paper breaks down Government expenses into three categories:

  • Pensions and other cash benefits
  • Social transfers in kind, such as health and education, where the spending has a clear recipient.
  • All other government spending such as infrastructure costs or defence is assumed to be spread equally across all people above the age of 15.

The chart suggests that older people have benefited disproportionately across cash benefits and social transfers when measured on a real, per-person basis.

The next chart aggregates all Government spending across age groups.

Adding it up

So what does this all add up too? The paper says that by combined the net impact of taxes less transfers, you can gauge the impact of the tax and transfer system on different ages over time. And here’s the result:

This shows that the system has transferred money from people of working age to those of older ages in every period. But the net transfer to older Australians has increased most in real terms in recent years. And transfers to younger cohorts have not increased to the same degree.

Key findings

From the data, the paper reaches several conclusions:

  1. The tax and transfer system has not adjusted to the changing age profile of income in Australia. It increasingly favour older Australians at the expense of the young. Unless we want to explicitly favour older Australians, policies should be considered that reduce payments to older people and shift the tax burden away from the young towards the old. Policy rules around means testing could be an important part of such a shift.
  2. The personal income tax system captures only around two-thirds of household income, leaving income generated from owner-occupied housing and superannuation lightly taxed. This has important implications for efficiency and equity.
  3. Growth in land prices has created large transfers of wealth between generations. This price growth is driven to some extent by government policies, such as restrictive zoning and planning practices. Removing these barriers makes sense.
  4. To achieve a fiscally sustainable budget over the coming decades, Australia must choose between increasing taxes and reducing government expenses. The consequences of this adjustment should be borne, at least in part, by older Australians. Achieving budget sustainability solely by increasing taxes on Australians of working age (mostly by growing personal income tax revenue through bracket creep) will worsen generational inequities.

****

On the topic of Government expenses, Peter Swan and Dimitri Burshtein say Labor should make spending cuts a top priority. Reining in spending wouldn't just address our budget concerns but they say it would also clear the way for the meaningful tax reforms that are needed to boost Australia's ailing productivity.

****

In my article for this edition, I look at Buffett's shock announcement to depart as Berkshire Hathaway CEO and reflect on his extraordinary legacy as an investor and teacher. I also address some of his concerns about America's future, as he warns of unsustainable deficits and a fragile US currency.

James Gruber

Also in this week's edition...

Former Liberal Party minister, Arthur Sinodinos, breaks down what went wrong for his party in the election. He says the Liberals pursued ideology over the values and needs of mainstream Australia. He believes the party needs to return to its Menzian, pragmatic roots and integrate those values with those of the broader community. And it wouldn't hurt to get some senior party elders to lead this so it happens well before the next election, he says.

For the fist time in more than a decade, gold is getting news headlines and retail investor interest. And, predictably, we're starting to get outlandish forecasts for the gold price. US$5,000 an ounce? There's even been a US$20,000 prediction of late. Research Affiliate's Campbell Harvey digs deep into the key drivers for gold and gives a balanced assessment of what may be in store for the yellow metal.

Pelin Akyol and Kadir Atalay says Australia’s push to delay retirement has boosted workforce participation - but at a cost. Their research reveals the measures have unintentionally impacted fertility rates, and the trend will be hard to reverse.

Contrarian investing lost its lustre in recent years as momentum driven markets reached new highs. This year's market volatility though has brought more opportunities for the contrarians. Among the tribe is MFS Portfolio Manager Zahid Kassam who details his views on the benefits and potential pitfalls of contrarianism as well as his favourite global stock picks.

The wheels are falling off the green transition in America, according to Peter Zeihan. He says it's largely due to economic pressures, lack of financing, and the new tariffs instituted by Donald Trump.

This week's whitepaper is Neuberger Berman's latest Fixed Income Investment Outlook looking at ways to ride out the Trump administration’s tariff storm.

Curated by James Gruber and Leisa Bell

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Listed Investment Company (LIC) Indicative NTA Report from Bell Potter

LIC (LMI) Monthly Review from Independent Investment Research

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 

7 Comments
Michael
May 08, 2025

Government paid aged pensions, rent assistance and healthcare costs have increased as have these costs for all ages. Younger ages have to meet these costs from earned income where aged pensioners cannot. Taxes on owner-occupier housing and superannuation will affect all ages, not just older Australians, unless it is levied based on age.

June
May 08, 2025

There are positives and negatives in this report. For self funded retirees, who see grandchildren earning in excess of $150K, but still having the "I want it all now" approach, this sort of sticks in the throat after years of scrimping and going without, in order to be self funded retirees. It also overlooks the wealth transfer of those of us who are helping family whilst we are still alive.....there are many more nuances to this whole story.

Julie T
May 08, 2025

This is looking at taxes and government transfer - it has nothing to do with your own wealth transfer.

Sally
May 09, 2025

Summed up my feelings in a nutshell.

JohnS
May 08, 2025

What we also need to see is this information for a much longer time frame. I think you will find that over a lifetime, net transfer payments to someone aged (say) 75 today would show that they have made a contribution to the government over their lifetimes

christian
May 08, 2025

I agree with JohnS
The stats do not lie of course, but there are other intangibles that are easy to overlook.
Compulsory super was not available before 1992 meaning older Australians did not have this advantage that are available to all now, including the 18-30yos.
Older women in particular have been impacted even moreso it seems.
Before Pension means tests were introduced around 1970, its fair to say many older taxpayers were under the inpression they paid taxes and would be entitled to a full pension.as in the past, Of course this has changed a few times since as means tests were tightened.

Julie T
May 08, 2025

Hmm, the data is from 1991, so you reckon you and others 75 and over now made large transfers before that date.

Doubt it.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Pros and cons of Labor's home batteries scheme

Labor has announced a $2.3 billion Cheaper Home Batteries Program, aimed at slashing the cost of home batteries. The goal is to turbocharge battery uptake, though practical difficulties may prevent that happening.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 605 with weekend update

Trump's tariffs and China's retaliatory strike have sent the Nasdaq into a bear market with the S&P 500 not far behind. What are the implications for the economy and markets, and what should investors do now? 

  • 3 April 2025

Howard Marks: the investing game has changed

The famed investor says the rapid switch from globalisation to trade wars is the biggest upheaval in the investing environment since World War Two. And a new world requires a different investment approach.

World's largest asset manager wants to revolutionise your portfolio

Larry Fink is one of the smartest people in the finance industry. In his latest shareholder letter, the Blackrock CEO outlines his quest to become the biggest player in private assets and upend investor portfolios.

4 ways to take advantage of the market turmoil

Every crisis throws up opportunities. Here are ideas to capitalise on this one, including ‘overbalancing’ your portfolio in stocks, buying heavily discounted LICs, and cherry picking bombed out sectors like oil and gas.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 606 with weekend update

The boss of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, UniSuper’s John Pearce, says Trump has declared an economic war and he’ll be reducing his US stock exposure over time. Should you follow suit?

  • 10 April 2025

Latest Updates

Economics

Does Buffett’s farewell represent peak America?

Buffett's surprise decision to step down as Berkshire Hathaway's CEO sparked reflection on his legendary legacy and concern for America’s future, as he warned of unsustainable deficits and possible cracks in U.S. exceptionalism.

Taxation

Labor should focus on cutting Government spending

Reining in the Government's appetite for spending wouldn't just ease the country's fiscal burden. It would also clear the way for the meaningful tax reforms that are needed to boost Australia's ailing productivity.

Economy

The Liberals need to return to Menzies’ values

The former Liberal Minister and Chief of Staff to John Howard gives a blunt assessment of the election defeat and how the party needs to get back to its roots and merge its values with the needs of the community.

Gold

Gold $5,000?

Following the gold price's recent surge, headlines have popped up with increasingly bold predictions - US$5,000, even US$20,000 an ounce? This looks at the fundamentals and the credibility of these bullish predictions.

Economy

Are pension rules impacting fertility?

Australia’s push to delay retirement has boosted workforce participation - but at a cost. New research shows the measures have unintentionally impacted fertility rates, and the trend will be hard to reverse.

Investment strategies

Profiting from panic: inside the mind of a contrarian investor

Recent years have been challenging for contrarian investors, though 2025 has brought wild market swings, and with it, more opportunity. MFS' Zahid Kassam discusses contrarianism and his favourite global stocks.

Economics

America's green transition is taking a beating

The green transition in the US has made great progress in recent years, but the wheels are falling off. This is largely due to economic pressures, lack of financing, and the new tariffs instituted by Trump.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.