Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 377

20k now or 50k later? What’s driving decisions to withdraw super?

Written with Hazel Bateman, Robbie Campo, David Constable, Isabella Dobrescu, Ailsa Goodwin, Junhao Liu, and Ben R Newell.

 

The COVID-19 Superannuation Early Release Scheme was one of the first pandemic-related policy changes made by the Australian Government. In April 2020, the Government announced that superannuation fund members experiencing loss of employment or financial hardship during COVID-19 could apply to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to withdraw up to $20,000 of their superannuation savings by 24 September, without giving formal proof of eligibility at application. On 23 July 2020, the Treasurer extended the Scheme to 31 December 2020.

The Scheme modifies otherwise very tight controls over superannuation withdrawals. The prevailing rules prevent most members from accessing their savings before reaching a minimum ‘preservation’ age (55-60, depending on birthdate) and retiring (or transitioning to retirement), with some limited exceptions in cases of extreme personal or financial hardship. The Scheme thus changes a fundamental element of the retirement savings system in Australia.

The pattern of withdrawals of funds by superannuation fund members since the start of the Scheme shows that the usual preservation rules play a critical role in preventing members from spending their mandatory savings before retirement. The ATO has received more than 3 million applications to withdraw early under the Scheme, and funds have paid out $34 billion. The number and size of withdrawals indicates that the scheme is likely to have extensive short- and long-term effects on individual and aggregate retirement savings in Australia.

Survey of super members

Many important questions about the operation and effect of the COVID-19 early release scheme remain unanswered. To better understand these issues, we analysed survey responses of early withdrawers from a large industry superannuation fund, Cbus. Cbus is a profit-for-members fund that primarily serves the construction sector. It has almost 760,000 members and manages around $56 billion in savings. By 9 August 2020, Cbus had made more than 229,000 early release payments with an average withdrawal of $8,408. Between early May 2020 and early July 2020, Cbus surveyed 3,047 members who had withdrawn superannuation savings under the Scheme.

Respondent characteristics

The median survey respondent was 39 years-of-age, male, and withdrew the full $10,000 (the Scheme allowed two tranches up to $10,000 each) from their account. Table 1 shows characteristics of the average and median survey respondent.

Amounts withdrawn

More than 20% of respondents virtually emptied their accounts; however, 43% reported they had withdrawn less than 20% of their entire balance as shown in Figure 1.

Most respondents withdrew either the $10,000 upper limit, or an amount very close to their account balance, if their balance was less than the upper limit. Those who left small residual amounts could have been preserving insurance cover or may have been working from slightly dated balance information when making their application. Figure 2 shows residual balances after withdrawals compared with the $10,000 limit. The fact that only 9% of respondents withdrew less than the limit while still preserving more than $1,000 in their account, demonstrates that respondents were strongly guided, and effectively constrained, by the $10,000 limit.

Reasons for withdrawal

The Government intended the COVID-19 Scheme would help people who were unemployed, made redundant or who were experiencing reduced work hours, to meet expenses during the COVID-19 restrictions.

We find that more than half of respondents reported that they withdrew funds to meet immediate expenses or to cover lost income. Notably, results in Table 2 also show that around one quarter were thinking of future financial pressures. In other words, one in four respondents appear to be taking precautions. Then again, few respondents cited concerns about falling asset values or simple impatience as reasons for accessing their savings.

The focus on needing savings for expenses now or in the near future aligns closely with results in Figure 3, that shows that a sense of need motivated around 47% of early-withdrawers while a desire for security motivated around 35%.

Understanding the decision to withdraw

Around half the respondents report spending a week or less thinking before they decided if they would apply for early release, and 28% either made their minds up immediately or within a day of hearing about the scheme. Figure 4 reports the distribution of respondents’ deliberation times.

Surveyed members expressed a high degree of uncertainty or unconcern about the long-term implications of the withdrawal. Around one-third of respondents said that they were unsure about the impact of their withdrawal on their retirement balances or had not thought about that or did not care. Figure 5 shows how surveyed members answered questions related to retirement impact. These findings demonstrate that many withdrawers either could not, or did not, evaluate the impact of their decision.

We also compared respondents’ estimates of the impact of their withdrawal with a projection of that impact based on assumptions made in a Cbus guidance on the early release scheme for members.

Figure 6 shows that 50% of respondents either underestimated the impact of the withdrawal on their superannuation accumulation at retirement or did not make an attempt to estimate the impact (categorised as 'Others' in Figure 6). The pattern of responses to the question on estimated impact, where each possible answer is chosen at approximately the same rate by respondents, is consistent with random selection of answers, and thus with general uncertainty among withdrawing members about long-term impact.


Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

Employment status and the Early Release Scheme

To be eligible to make a withdrawal under the Scheme, members must be unemployed, receiving JobSeeker, Youth Allowance for job seekers, Parenting Payment, Special Benefit or Farm household Allowance, have been made redundant on or after 1 January 2020, or experiencing a 20% or more reduction in work hours or turnover for sole traders.

Of surveyed members, 28% had lost their jobs due to the crisis, and 51% had reduced working hours since the crisis (Table 3). Within the group of members who were employed, about 45% were not sure or did not think they would continue to be employed.

Members who were employed withdrew a smaller percentage of their account balances, on average (Table 4). (We note that those who were employed were likely to have had higher balances than unemployed members before withdrawing that may partly explain the lower average percentage.)

Those who are employed and maintaining their working hours are less likely to withdraw for immediate concerns and expenses, and more likely to anticipate future needs or the protection of their savings (Table 5). Those who are employed but experiencing reduced hours spent more time thinking about withdrawing their superannuation savings before they acted (Table 6).

Future survey work will examine whether these trends continue in the second phase of the early release scheme, which allows an additional $10,000 to be withdrawn from superannuation accounts in the period 1 July to 31 December 2020.

The full version of this report can be found here.

 

Hazel Bateman, School of Risk & Actuarial Studies, UNSW Sydney & CEPAR. Robbie Campo, David Constable, and Ailsa Goodwin, Cbus. Isabella Dobrescu, School of Economics, UNSW Sydney. Junhao Liu, Finance Discipline, The University of Sydney Business School, The University of Sydney. Ben R Newell, School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney. Susan Thorp, Finance Discipline, The University of Sydney Business School, The University of Sydney.

Thanks to Cbus, particularly Robbie Campo and David Constable for access to data from a survey of Cbus members. This article is general information.

 

1 Comments
Warren Bird
October 01, 2020

I'm not surprised by these results, which seem to confirm what most observers would intuitively have thought would be the reasons people would take advantage of the early access scheme.

To a large extent it's a reflection of the reality that times of heightened uncertainty and near term threat to livelihood change many people's time preference for money. They will much more heavily discount the value of funds in the more distant future than they previously did.

To some extent it also reveals that some people see super as a forced saving that they otherwise wouldn't have undertaken and the chance to get some of their money out was taken gleefully. That's not a surprise either. I think we've always known that some people have a time preference of money that's misaligned with the implied time preference in the compulsory superannuation scheme. That's the nature of policy-making, though. Balancing individual wants with 'the common good' - in this case, the need to encourage more long term saving by people who'd reach retirement in the context of an ageing demographic for the nation as a whole.

The alternative policy would have been to make larger one-off payments to those affected by COVID in this way. That would require taxation to go up in the future to repay the debt incurred to fund today's payments, but the government is surely in a better position to make more sober judgements about the appropriate time preference for money (ie the value of those future taxes compared with the payments made today) than individuals facing a fear that they may not be able to feed their families. In so many other ways the Government has done just that, with the upcoming Budget expected to reveal a record deficit and funding requirement. The early access to super policy stands out like a bit of a sore thumb as an anachronistic policy response alongside lots of other spending measures.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Keating versus Hume: where willy-nilly meets obscene

Risk in retirement: five strategies for finding the right balance

The coiled spring: markets are primed for the year ahead

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

400th Edition Special: 45 of the best investment ideas

Over eight years since February 2013, Firstlinks has become a leading financial newsletter, publishing thousands of articles from hundreds of writers. To mark this milestone, 45 experts have joined the celebration for our 400th edition bringing their best investing ideas for the next few years.

Four bubbly market pockets show heightened risk for investors

At the top of every market, there are signs that investors look back on and say the excesses were obvious. While many parts of the market are fairly valued, here are four bubbles which show irrational exuberance.

Turning point: the 2020s baby boom retirement surge

Every week, 2,500 Australians retire, or at least, reach the age of 65, and 2021-2027 will represent the peak years of the baby boom retirement surge. Longevity of life comes with dangers and opportunities.

How long will my retirement savings last?

Many self-funded retirees will outlive their savings as most men and women now aged 65 will survive at least another 20 years. Compare your spending with how much you earn to see how long your money will last.

The world in 2030: Six investing tips for the next decade

Six portfolio managers look at how life may change by the end of the decade and how shifting trends are influencing their investment decisions. It's an optimistic view of the world in 2030 as a better place.

The equity of government support for retirement income

Claims about the inequity of super tax concessions and the advantages for high income earners miss a fundamental point. It's fairer with more realistic assumptions on the value of future payments.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

In fact, most people have no super when they die

Contrary to the popular belief supported by the 'fact base' of the Retirement Income Review, four in every five Australians aged 60 and over have no super in the period up to four years before their death.

Investment strategies

The risk-return tradeoff: What’s the right asset mix for a 5% return?

Conservative investors are forced to choose between protecting capital and accepting lower income while drawing down capital to maintain living standards or taking additional risk. How can you strike a balance?

Investment strategies

Mind the bond/equity rebalancing gap

The 12 months ending 31 March 2021 saw the largest positive divergence in returns between global equities and bonds in nearly 50 years. To retain a target balance, investors need to sell equities and buy bonds.

Investment strategies

Do bonds still offer a buffer to equity volatility?

Most Australians place their superannuation into a balanced fund, making the relationship between bonds and equities a vital part of performance. Does the traditional correlation between shares and bonds still hold? 

Strategy

Five trends shaping investments in China: 2021 and beyond

Australia has its tensions with China but with a strong base and a competitive, well-educated workforce, China’s manufacturing champions will advance its technology prowess and gain global market share.

Investment strategies

The fascinating bank hybrid journey of the last year

Bank hybrids produced excellent returns in the last year and the biggest lesson from March 2020 is that many investors don’t understand the structures, and in a crisis, they panic first and think later.

Shares

Eight quick lessons on the intricacies of selling shares

When we think about investing, we think about buying. The intricacies of the selling decisions are frequently overlooked, and poor selling is correlated to a lack of conviction. Selling is as important as buying.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.