Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 544

Should you be worried about high-flying markets?

“Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.”

A glance at the Fear & Greed Index, used to gauge the current mood of the market, brings this well-known quote from Warren Buffett to mind. The Index has moved from ‘fear’ just over a year ago, to ‘greed’ in November 2023, and is now close to ‘extreme greed’ mode.1

Digging into the index’s underlying indicators, it’s worth noting that four of the seven inputs are pointing to ‘extreme greed’ (including market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth and junk bond demand) while the put/call ratio points to ‘greed’. The only inputs that are keeping the index from what could be all-time extreme greed level are market volatility, which is at ‘neutral’ but trending towards greed with the low level of the VIX, and the demand for safe haven assets which is currently registering ‘neutral’. The latter should be taken with a pinch of salt with US Treasury bond yields as elevated as they are. Risk-free yield has a definite allure at present – even for investors who are not looking for a safe haven.

Figure 1. The market is close to ‘extreme greed’ mode

Source: CNN Business, as at 12 January 2024.

Before we delve into why this greed measure might be more of a warning than a sign of good things to come, let’s first consider why the market is seemingly so exuberant: for that, we need to look to the Federal Reserve (Fed). The Fed has been fighting pandemic-fuelled inflation now for the better part of two years, and if the graph below tells us anything, the Fed, after initially missing the damage that was done to price stability, is doing an admirable job. It has managed to bring down inflation to low single digits from the June 2022 peak and has done so without hurting its other mandate of unemployment (figure 3) which has remained below 4% since February 2022. The market loves the fact that to date the Fed has seemingly been able to thread the needle of a soft landing – November 2023 was the largest cross-asset rally since before the Global Financial Crisis – but how soon the Fed can start easing monetary policy is a matter of great debate.

Figure 2. US Consumer Price Index - Inflation now at low single digits from its June 2022 peak

Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available here: www.bls.gov/charts/consumer-price-index/consumer-price-index-bycategory-line-chart.htm

Figure 3. US unemployment remains steady since February 2022

Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available here: www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-unemploymentrate.htm

From what we’ve seen in recent weeks, the market’s shift to risk-on has been especially painful for short sellers being squeezed as the market melts up. In December 2023, the most shorted stocks (as measured by the Goldman Sachs Most Shorted Rolling Index) rallied 21%. Compare that to the most held long positions by hedge funds (proxied by the Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) which is only up 3%. This feels like a sign of capitulation as market participants give up the ghost of a hard landing. But has that call been made too soon? Rates markets don’t think so.

Figure 4. The junk rally

Source: Bloomberg, as at 31 December 2023.

We can gauge the market’s expectation on the path of the Fed funds rate by implying probabilities through futures pricing. Through this lens, we see that the market is implying almost a full 25bps cut to rates (actually, 22bps) with an estimated 75% probability of this happening at the March 2024 meeting, and a further 125bps(!) of cuts spread throughout the rest of 2024. That means that there are six 25bps cuts priced in for 2024 during eight meetings (January, March, May, June, July, September, November and December).

It seems unlikely that the Fed would take action during September and November unless absolutely necessary (i.e. recession), namely because it is unlikely to want to be seen as political and as having an impact on the US presidential election. This would mean that the Fed would need to make the majority of its cuts at the first six meetings. January seems unlikely for a cut – the Fed is still data-dependent and waiting for the effects of higher rates to slowly cool the economy. So that leaves only the March, May, June and July meetings to cut. The implied rate cuts through to the July meeting is nearly a full 100bps. That would mean 25bps cuts at each of those four meetings. This seems unlikely unless one of two things take place: 1) the US economy takes a sharp nosedive and/or unemployment rises dramatically; or 2) there is a large, idiosyncratic risk-off event.

Figure 5. Implied US interest rate and number of Fed cuts during 2024

Source: Bloomberg, as at 29 December 2023.

The US economy proved to be quite resilient in 2023. Annual GDP growth for 3Q2023 rose at 4.9%, up from 2.1% in 2Q2023.2 So the likelihood of a sudden US economy nosedive seems low. As referenced earlier, unemployment has been steadily below 4% since the beginning of 2022, and the stimulus effect of the market rally has allowed for tighter financial conditions to continue, so the odds of a sudden hard landing feels remote.

That brings us to the second possibility: a large idiosyncratic risk-off event. The scary thing about such events is that we rarely see them coming. Unfortunately, however, there are enough hot spots geopolitically to make the risk-aware hairs on the backs of our necks stand up.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict comes to mind first. When it began in February 2022, it exacerbated the existing inflationary forces in the market. Geopolitical turmoil in the Middle East can have an outsized impact on the global economy, and yet the market seems to be underpricing the impact of the Israel-Hamas war and conflicts in the Red Sea that are arising. In response to recent attacks on commercial ships in the Red Sea by Houthi rebels, we saw the US and UK carry out targeted strikes in Yemen on 11 January, raising fears about further escalation of conflict in the region. An estimated 30% of global trade traverses the Red Sea each day and is a crucial route for the world’s oil trade. The Red Sea has become even more important for Russian oil shipped to Asia as European countries have shunned Russian oil imports following the invasion of Ukraine. A potential blockage of the Red Sea, and more specifically the Suez Canal, would interrupt not just oil shipments, but also cause supply chain issues for key consumer goods like Chinese car parts and Indian cotton. These supply chain disruptions, even if only temporary, would likely cause an uptick in inflation giving support to the Fed to keep rates higher for longer, or even hike the target rate further.

Idiosyncratic risk-off events have a way of spreading into global markets, and in this case, there’s the potential for them to undo some of the work that the Fed (and other central banks) have done to fight inflation. If we were to see another wave of rising inflation, then it’s safe to say that we won’t see the Fed Funds rate 150bps lower in 2024.

Conclusion

This all puts the Fed on a knife’s edge. The market is giving it the proverbial thumbs-up on a job well done, and yet there feels like there is nearly balanced risk between the Fed being able to declare mission accomplished and start easing again, and the risk that inflation isn’t dead yet and could be exacerbated by forces outside of the Fed’s control which would mean it has to disappoint the market and return to tightening.

All in all, the potential upsides and downsides of the current market environment don’t provoke tremendous optimism. Given how 'greedy' the market is currently looking, it may well be that the risks that loom in 2024 are underpriced.

 

1. As at 12 January, 2024. For more on the inputs to this metric, see this page: Fear and Greed Index - Investor Sentiment | CNN.
2. Source: www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product

 

Jonathan Daffron is Head of Managed Account Platform, at Man FRM. Man Group is a specialist investment manager partner of GSFM, and GSFM Funds Management is a sponsor of Firstlinks. The information included in this article is provided for informational purposes only. Man Group do not represent that this information is accurate and complete, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any opinions expressed in this material reflect our judgment at this date, are subject to change and should not be relied upon as the basis of your investment decisions.

For more articles and papers from GSFM and partners, click here.

 

3 Comments
Chris B
January 26, 2024

The US Fed controls money supply using (1) Interest Rates and (2) its Balance Sheet.

Interest Rates may have peaked, but there's still a long way to go on the US Fed Reserve Balance sheet, and this will continue to tighten Money Supply even as interest rates come down.

Since 21 March 2023, the US Fed Reserve has reduced it's Balance Sheet from circa 8.7 Trillion USD to circa 7.7 Trillion USD on Tues 16 Jan 2024.

That's 1 Trillion USD pulled out of the US Economy in less than 1 year.

The Fed would need to pull another 3.7 Trillion USD out of the US Economy to return the Fed Reserve Balance Sheet to Pre-covid levels of circa 4 Trillion USD.

So whilst we're getting the message that US Interest Rates may go down later this year - easing Money supply - there appears to be no end in sight for the US Fed pulling money out of the US Economy. A shrinking US Fed Reserve Balance tightens money supply.

In summary, only one lever - interest rates - is loosening money supply. The second lever - the Fed's Balance Sheet - is still tightenning money supply ... and there's still a long way to go.

Also, if stock market values are 'overheated', there are also those who believe that US Interest Rates can't actually come down until 'Market Valuations have returned to earth'. This is the other big 'wealth effect' that impacts how much money people believe they have.

Here's the link to the chart for the US Fed Reserve Balance Sheet:
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm



Peter
January 26, 2024

I just finished reading the USA business news (25/1/2024). One article states that this country is "at the crossroads" while a major USA international bank claims that "healthier growth is on the way". Who do you believe? The reality is nobody can forecast the future. As for me, I read extensively and invest when I feel is the right time.

Wayne K
January 25, 2024

Like a lot of finance articles, this one makes broad assumptions. There is not just one market, but dozens. Some go up, others go down. In other words, there's usually always something that is extremely bubbly and something else that is depressed. The trick is to differentiate between them and buy accordingly.

 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

An important Foxtel announcement...

News Corp's plans to sell Foxtel are surprising in that streaming assets Kayo, Binge and Hubbl look likely to go with it. This and recent events in the US show the bind that legacy TV businesses find themselves in.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 575 with weekend update

A new study has found Australians far outlive people in other English-speaking countries. We live four years longer than the average American and two years more than the average Briton, and some of the reasons why may surprise you.

  • 29 August 2024

The challenges of building a portfolio from scratch

It surprises me how often individual investors and even seasoned financial professionals don’t know the basics of building an investment portfolio. Here is a guide to do just that, as well as the challenges involved.

Creating a bulletproof investment portfolio

Is it possible to build a portfolio that performs well in any economic environment? So-called 'All Weather' portfolios have become more prominent of late, and this looks at what these portfolios are and their pros and cons.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 578 with weekend update

The number of high-net-worth individuals in Australia has increased by almost 9% over the past year, and they now own $3.3 trillion in investable assets. A new report reveals how the wealthy are investing their money.

  • 19 September 2024

Why I'm a perma-bull on stocks

Investors overestimate the risk of owning stocks and underestimate the risk of not owning them. In the long run, shares crush other major asset classes, yet it’s one thing to understand this, it’s another to being able to execute on it.

Latest Updates

Investing

Where to find good investment writing and advice

Investors are exposed to so much information that it’s often hard to filter the good from the bad. This looks at how to tell the difference between the two and the best sources of investment writing and advice.

Investment strategies

Are demographics destiny for the stock market?

Demographics influence economies and stock markets, but other factors like technology and policy can overshadow their impact. Diversifying across income-producing assets can help mitigate demographic-driven challenges and build wealth.

Shares

Are we reaching the end of Transurban's gravy train?

You can only push monopoly power so far before it triggers a backlash. Transurban might have finally pushed too far, raising big questions for investors.

The dawn of wicked asset classes

Collectables and other non-traditional assets often rally late in the cycle. But you should only buy them with a clear purpose and with money you can afford to lose.

Property

This property valuation metric needs a rethink

Capitalisation rates, commonly known as ‘cap rates’, are a fundamental metric in Australian property investing.  However, this seemingly simple and ubiquitous measure can be far more complex to use when comparing different types of properties.

Superannuation

Improving access to account-based pensions

Research suggests that 50,000 Australians who are retiring over the next year may not be able to access an account-based pension because they do not meet minimum application requirements of their super fund.

Do sanctions work?

Sanctions are losing effectiveness due to increasing economic polarisation, with many countries increasingly circumventing restrictions. Examples include China, Iran and Russia, whose industries have adapted despite sanctions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.