Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 270

10 years on from the GFC, retirees still jittery

The Australian share market is booming, riding one of the longest bull runs in history, but retirees are still worried about the impact of a potential downturn.

According to Chant West, super funds are reporting five-year returns of up to 10% p.a. with 10-year returns of 6%-7% p.a., well ahead of fund targets. However, some of this reflects the low starting point. Back in mid-2008, we were in the middle of the GFC, with Lehman Brothers collapsing in September of that year. The Australian market (S&P/ASX200) was already more than 25% off its all-time high set in November 2007. It then dropped another 36% as the GFC wreaked further havoc in the first half of 2009.

With the impressive market returns in the last five years or so, the damaging impact of the GFC has faded in the minds of many. There are also younger investors who didn’t experience it first-hand. One group that hasn’t forgotten are Australians retirees, who fear the impact of another financial crisis on their lifestyles. A research report recently published by National Seniors Australia (NSA) and Challenger highlights that retirees still harbour concerns over share market downturns. 72% of Australian seniors are concerned about the potential occurrence of another GFC and the impact it would have on their retirement finances.

The stability of capital and inflation-adjusted income

This concern stems, in part, from retirees’ need for income. Regular income is their highest priority and many are prepared to trade off the amount of income they get in return for stability. 78% of retirees surveyed by the NSA prefer regular and stable income over less stable, but higher, returns. Nearly 80% want an income stream that will last for life, even if there is the potential for higher income elsewhere. A market downturn that puts their income at risk is a big concern.

Retirees draw their income from their savings, but most retirees realise that they have to eat some of their cake as well. So it is the price index that matters to them, not the accumulation indices that compound over decades. The S&P/ASX200 Price Index remains well below its peak in 2007 of 6,873, so it should be no surprise that retirees are still worried.

The ‘real’ value also matters. For each retiree dollar to recover the spending power it had at the 2007 market peak, the S&P/ASX200 would need to clear 8,600. That’s another 34% rise from current levels. I haven’t seen a predictions of the ASX index at this level any time soon, but no doubt it will get there eventually. Inflation matters to retirees because wages, which most no longer enjoy, have historically tended to rise broadly in line with rising prices. This trend has not been borne out in recent times for many wage earners.

The NSA report also notes that most retirees are not tolerant to losses (i.e. diminutions of their capital, whether or not actually realised). 23% claim that they cannot tolerate any 12-month loss on their retirement savings and only 25% would tolerate a loss as large as 10% or higher. Given that super funds fell in value by twice this amount in the GFC, retirees are worried about a potential repeat. One retiree in the survey summed it up this way:

“The main issue with the GFC for me was the reduction in my capital investments of approximately $30,000. Up until that point, I would be considered a medium risk investor, however following my loss, I changed to a low risk investor and transferred much of my capital into cash. The income from the cash stream is considerably less than a shares portfolio however I was not prepared to suffer another loss of that magnitude. My attitude has not changed to this day.”

Seeking a balance between secure income and growth

When 52% retirees worry that they will outlive their savings, we see evidence of hoarding, where fearful retirees underspend just to make sure they don’t run out of money.

The solution is not obvious to the typical retiree. Most retirees need exposure to some growth in their portfolio, but they also need regular and stable income. The retirement income products widely used in the super industry don’t meet both these needs and end up concentrating more on flexibility and liquidity at the expense of risk management.

Treasury’s retirement income covenant proposal is a step in the right direction. It will make sure that super funds are offering retirement products for their members that meet the needs that NSA, and others, highlight.

Lifetime annuity sales in Australia have been growing as retirees seek to secure some of their retirement income for life in the face of reduced access to the full age pension for many. In doing so, these retirees are being advised to allocate only a portion of their portfolio to a secure income stream with the remainder available to invest in growth assets. This provides the ability to balance flexibility and security for the retiree, while giving them the opportunity to spend more of their hard-earned savings. The Treasury proposal will make this more of a mainstream strategy, something that the large majority of retirees will benefit from.

 

Jeremy Cooper is Chairman, Retirement Income, at Challenger, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. For more articles and papers from Challenger, please click here.

RELATED ARTICLES

The comprehensive income product for retirement

The ASX's 16-year drought: a rebuttal

How super funds can better help with retirement planning

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.