Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Register

6 July 2025

Home / 389

24 hot stocks and funds for 2021

There is always doubt about the future, but 2021 will be especially challenging for investing. Equity markets are at stretched valuations as analysts build in optimism about earnings recovery and stimulus in a post-COVID world. The safety of cash and term deposits offers negative real yields, forcing many conservative investors to take on risk they would otherwise avoid. As they seek an elusive combination of defensive market exposure with reasonable yield, they see others enjoying the growth story by buying companies without profits or dividends. Time will tell who wins.

We contacted two dozen fund managers and product providers, and thanks to the following contributors for their views on 2021:

  • Shane Miller, Chi-X Australia
  • Kris Webster, Magellan
  • Sean Fenton, Sage Capital
  • Steven Bennett, Charter Hall Group
  • Tim Canham and Wik Farwerck, First Sentier Investors
  • Aaron Binsted, Lazard Australia
  • Franklin Global Growth Fund team, Franklin Templeton
  • Gemma Dale, nabtrade
  • David Bassanese, BetaShares
  • Michael Murray, Australian Ethical
  • Nandita D’Souza, Citi
  • Perpetual Investments
  • Australian Equities Growth Team, First Sentier Investors
  • Deana Mitchell, Australian Ethical
  • Roger Montgomery, Montgomery Investment Management
  • Peter Bell, Bellmont Securities
  • Jordan Eliseo, The Perth Mint
  • Alex Pollak, Loftus Peak 
  • Jun Bei Liu, Tribeca Investment Partners
  • Marcus Padley, Marcus Today
  • Orbis Investments
  • Vanguard Investments Australia 
  • Adrian Martuccio, Bell Asset Management

We allowed nominations for listed companies, funds or sectors to give a broad range of opportunities, and you should read the recommendations in that context as some people mention their own funds.

Please note, responses were received around mid-December 2020 and some prices may have changed.

Graham Hand

Download here

 

Disclaimer: Highlighting these stock picks does not constitute any offer or inducement by Firstlinks or the contributing individuals and companies to make any investment. This publication is for general information only and has been prepared without considering any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs and you should therefore consider the appropriateness of the information, in light of your own objectives, financial situation or needs, before acting.

Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information at www.morningstar.com.au/s/fsg.pdf.

To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product's future performance.

 

5 Comments
Mic smith
January 30, 2021

Part of the problem here is that FirstLinks has given a forum to Fund Manager who want to pump the stocks they already own. These guys are doing well enough with their average 1% of assets commission plus usually 20% of benchmark "out performance". They do not need any further help from Firstlinks - or anyone else.

Graham Hand
January 30, 2021

Hi Mic, fair comments, but in the overall balance of its content, Firstlinks devotes relatively little space to stock picking as we prefer to give our readers enduring investment ideas. But the fact is that readers like stock picks, and these articles are highly popular. Little wonder some publications devote their entire content to stock picking, accepting (or ignoring) including the downside you identify of fund managers pumping up their own picks. Doesn't seem to bother them or their readers.

Mic Smith
February 14, 2021

Hi Graham,
Mic here again. Your point that readers love stock picks may well be correct. However your job is to educate readers. There is a whole "finance industry" out there, which when you look objectively, much of it is no more that a predator on the ignorant and gullible. This is what the Hayne Royal Commission was all about attempting to fix. If First Links wants to maintain a position as a genuine credible objective entity that helps the ordinary Australian with its finances, then First Links must do better. Please, start by calling out conflicts of interest.

Dane
January 07, 2021

I really like Cuffelinks but you would serve yourself well if you refrained from publishing market/asset class return forecasts, which are nothing more than guesses. A large body of evidence suggests they are close to worthless. Admittedly fundies will never day "I dont know' when asked about the future but we shouldn't be enablers. lol.

George
January 06, 2021

It will be interesting to see the winners and losers from this list in a year. So often, recommendations are made and there is no back-check. Let's hold the forecasts accountable.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

400th Edition Special: 45 of the best investment ideas

Hot stocks and funds for 2021

Firstlinks is sponsored by:
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

Site Map

About Firstlinks

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.