Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 308

4 food and drink trends to healthier investing

[Editor's comment. Check this image. Anyone offended? We had to laugh. Here at Cuffelinks, we regularly promote articles on Facebook (yes, for a cost). When we posted an ad for this article, Facebook's multi billion dollar AI engine knocked it back within minutes for the following reason:

"This ad isn't running because it uses images that excessively focus on a person's body or any given body part (ex: focusing on abs or belly fat). This can make users feel bad about themselves, and goes against our core value of fostering a positive global community. What to do next: Avoid images with close-ups of specific body parts or before-and-after photos."

You have to worry about AI, supposed to be the way of the future, when it cannot distinguish between an apple and a body. Maybe that's why it's called 'artificial' intelligence. At least the apple's sensitivities are safe while they work out how to restrict posts by terrorists and extremists.

We apologise to any apple that we offended. Or is that Facebook protecting apple?

Now, on with the real article.]

 

More than ever before, people of the world are keeping a close eye on their diets. Obesity has trebled since the 1970s, conditions such as diabetes and heart disease are rising, and in some high-income countries, life expectancy is flattening out. Food and beverage producers are under immense pressure to reform, both from stricter regulations and consumers demanding healthier choices.

As we consider how shifting health and nutrition trends impact business models, we see four outcomes which present both risk and opportunities.

1. Making food healthier

Taxation aimed at promoting better standards of nutrition has been introduced by dozens of national governments, states and individual cities, especially since 2015 when a damning World Health Organisation report was published.

Much of the focus is on sugar. In Mexico, for example, the world’s second-most obese country and where diabetes is the leading cause of death, a levy is placed on all sugary drinks except milk. In the UK, where a new tax on sugar levels was introduced in 2018, more than 50% of manufacturers reduced the sugar content of drinks ahead of its implementation.

Some leading companies have already made big commitments. Britvic, for example, has promised to reformulate its drinks in most countries, cutting sugar content and reducing average calories per 250ml by 20%. Meanwhile, Pepsico pledges to reduce sugar, saturated fat and sodium across many of its food and beverage products as part of its 2025 goals.

2. Right-sizing the product

Where reformulation is not possible, companies are instead focusing on portion size. Drinks manufacturers like Coca Cola (which notably had to reverse plans to introduce a new sweeter Coke recipe in the 1980s) has introduced slimline cans, meaning sugar content for the consumer is reduced with no reformulation required.

However, companies that go down this route have to exercise caution, as such a move could be damaging from a consumer perception that it is simply protecting margins via ‘shrinkflation’ (where the product shrinks in size but remains at the same price). Confectionary giant Mondelez tried to change the shape of its iconic Toblerone to guard against rising cocoa prices but was forced to change back and put up prices after a public outcry.

3. Transparency and labeling for consumers

A key factor for consumers is wanting more control over the choices they make. Transparency from companies over what their products contain is paramount. Making more information available on the nutritional value of products is an important factor in retaining their license to operate.

Voluntary ‘traffic-light’ schemes, displaying levels of calories, fat, sugar and salt have been introduced in many countries. Some companies are preempting the changes, such as Danone which is rolling out its ‘Nutri-Score’ colour-coding system in countries across Europe, even those where there is no labeling system in place yet.

4. Product change to healthier products

Finally, many businesses are making wholesale changes to their product lines to reflect the new environment. As consumers begin to view ultra-processed food in the same vein as smoking, companies are either simply cutting unhealthy products or switching to healthier alternatives.

Britvic, for example, now says 70% of its innovation pipeline is focused on developing low or no-sugar drinks (less than 5g per 100ml). Meanwhile, Kerry Foods has developed four ‘consumer nutrition pillars’ consisting of ‘free-from’ foods, diet brands, natural foods and products tailored to particular nutritional needs such as infants or individuals with specific medical conditions like diabetes.

Coca-Cola Amatil, based in Australia, is one of the largest bottlers of non-alcoholic ready-to-drink beverages in the Asia-Pacific region, operating also in New Zealand, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Samoa. In the Australian domestic market, Coca-Cola Amatil has launched low-calorie alternatives, such as Coke Zero, and innovative sparkling waters to reduce the distribution of products causing obesity and related health issues. They are taking advantage of the  growing demand for healthier beverages.

Change in emerging markets is slower

Coca-Cola Amatil’s approach to developing markets, such as Fiji and PNG, is however different to that in Australia, with the new healthy alternative not being distributed to those markets due to lack of demand.

Martin Currie Australia initiated discussion with the Coca-Cola Amatil Board in 2018 to enact change. The company has acknowledged the obesity and related health implications from their predominately full-sugar drinks, and they are working with the governments on solutions and further health education.

The investment perspective

The scale of opportunity from an investment perspective goes further than simply food and drink manufacturers. Food technology plays an increasingly important role, and the trend of health and wellness involves science-based companies like the developers of supplements (such as vitamins or flavour enhancers), and probiotics – live bacteria which can help reduce gastrointestinal problems and strengthen the body’s immune system.

There are also investment opportunities that provide investors with more control over how their funds are invested. For example, the Legg Mason Martin Currie Ethical Income Fund range explicitly will not invest in companies that are involved in the production or sale of alcohol or tobacco, leading to companies such as Coca-Cola Amatil, Woolworths, Coles, Metcash and Amcor being excluded from the investible universe.

The food and beverage sector is fiercely competitive and many companies are sensitive to both the large shifts in consumer sentiment towards healthy eating, as well as the heightened focus from politicians on nutrition and wellness. In all of our investment strategies, this requires us to look at which companies are successfully tackling the challenge, as well as those that are not. ESG analysis provides a valuable future view on the impacts for companies in this sector, including the opportunities and the threats, and by extension, the winners and the losers.

 

David Sheasby is Head of Stewardship & EGS at Martin Currie and Will Baylis is a Portfolio Manager with Martin Currie Australia, Legg Mason affiliates. Legg Mason is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. The information provided should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security. It should not be assumed that any of the security transactions discussed here were, or will prove to be, profitable. Please consider the appropriateness of this information, in light of your own objectives, financial situation or needs before making any decision.

For more articles and papers from Legg Mason, please click here.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Which companies will do well in the turmoil of 2020?

It’s the large stocks driving fund misery

Five industries profoundly changed by COVID-19

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.