Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 224

Are there opportunities for an active manager in an efficient market?

We view the Australian stockmarket as highly efficient. There are a large number of domestic research analysts, brokers, fund managers and investment professionals poring over the listed securities. In such an environment it is difficult, if not impossible, to regularly be smarter than the other informed market participants.

How does an individual stock picker outperform over long periods of time? Why would such a market present outstanding individual risk-adjusted opportunities for investors? It is a good question to ask if you are invested with an active manager. It has been a key question for researchers for a long time. Professor Eugene Fama’s Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) proposed that it is impossible to beat the performance of a liquid stockmarket over time because prices constantly incorporate and reflect all relevant information.

Opportunities come from cognitive biases

If we find a stock that we think is compellingly cheap, one of the first questions we ask is why we are getting the opportunity. What circumstances have led to the mispricing? What are people reacting to in order for the stock price to have deviated so far from our perception of fair value? The absence of a logical answer might infer a problem with the analysis, rather than an opportunity for an attractive purchase. The collective market is almost always more informed than the individual investor, assuming the investor is an outsider to the company under consideration.

We think we find opportunities for one predominant reason. Market participants have cognitive biases that lead to emotional rather than rational responses to new or changing circumstances. We are no different. We feel the same emotional responses. Our role is to invest as rationally as possible. We focus attention on the facts and try to remove the influence of the emotional response from our thinking.

Good investments typically come in one of three forms. The first is at the stock level. A company has a temporary setback or earnings revision and the market extrapolates the problem across the entire business. We focus on the medium-term outlook and ask whether we can make sensible, modest forecasts about earnings over the following few years. If earnings are delivered as expected, would this make buying at the current stock price attractive? A favourable answer means there’s a time horizon arbitrage in a company we would like to own for a long time.

Secondly, sometimes a whole sector might screen as attractively priced because the market is focused on a threat that appears overblown. An example is shown in the chart below.

In May 2014, the Federal Government proposed a restrictive and somewhat unpopular budget to assist in repairing the budget deficit. Over the following six months, the market sold retail stocks that many assumed would be significantly impacted by any cut to disposable income. The likely numerical impact of any budget measures on consumer discretionary spend was, on our analysis, likely to be small and transitory in nature. It gave an attractive entry point into a number of high quality retailers that we had been watching for some time.

Thirdly, there may be a market-wide reaction to a particular event, such as the surprise election of Donald Trump or UK’s Brexit vote. Participants in the domestic market reacted to Brexit by selling financial stocks in the weeks that followed. We believed the risks to corporate earnings were relatively low. Similarly, it was unclear why the election of President Trump would negatively impact the earnings of Australian companies, yet at one point in the afternoon of the election the domestic stockmarket was down nearly 4% (as highlighted below). Many individual stocks were down considerably, having already fallen on the uncertainty heading into the election.

Need to be patient for these opportunities

Outstanding opportunities do not come along frequently, and certainly not predictably. In the intervening periods, investors should be as patient as possible, remaining focused on their existing portfolio and ready to respond rationally. There may be an opportunity to invest sensibly in familiar companies with quality attributes.

We agree with the notion that the market is most often efficient, but that the difference between ‘often’ and ‘always’ is like night and day. Opportunities for the value investor occur when the majority of market participants are distracted from the immediate opportunity by an issue where the impact is either exaggerated or transitory. This is when we become most interested and plan to take full advantage for the long-term.

 

Tim Carleton is Principal and Portfolio Manager at Auscap Asset Management, a boutique Australian equities long/short investment manager. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual. A person should obtain the Product Disclosure Statement before deciding whether to acquire, or to continue to hold, units in any Auscap fund.

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.