Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 596

After DeepSeek, what's next for the big US tech companies?

In life, we frequently conflate symptoms with their underlying causes, leading us to sometimes address the effects and not the actual causes of issues. We see this occurring, for example, when a doctor prescribes a topical medicine with negative side effects to treat a skin condition instead of addressing what may be the root issue — an unhealthy lifestyle and a poor diet. The overall effect of practices such as these might be why the length of the average health-span — the period of life spent in good health — has not kept pace with longer lifespans and is actually falling.

A similar pattern can be observed in today’s financial markets. With index concentrations at historic highs, I often read and hear from active investors that the growth of passive investing is to blame. However, both index concentration and passive ownership reaching all-time highs are the result of the same underlying cause: investor demand for the stocks of companies with massive profit growth.

The cause

All financial asset prices reflect investors’ aggregated expectations of future cash flows. Take equities. While each sector is different, they all generally coalesce around profits, earnings-per-share, net income, free cash flow and what have you. So when a corporation in a large industry manages to capture a disproportionately high share of the profit pool, its stock becomes an outsized proportion of a stock index. We saw this with AT&T, General Motors, IBM and others in the 1950s and 1960s.

Similarly, today we observe this with mega-cap artificial intelligence stocks, the net income growth expectations of which vastly outpace those of other S&P 500 companies (Exhibit 1). In 2023, the growth expectations of AI stocks were 20 times higher than for those of the rest of the S&P. It’s these profit expectations and differentials that primarily drive their index weightings.

However, index concentration and the resulting share-taking by passive affects the 495 non-AI5 stocks (The 'Artificial Intelligence 5 or AI5' companies are Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Nvidia and Alphabet). Liquidity doesn’t scale, and every dollar pulled away from discretionary portfolios and allocated to nondiscretionary ones places downward pressure on the cost of equity capital for these companies.

So where’s the risk?

Falling net income expectations for the AI companies

Index concentration doesn’t end because passive flows reverse. Any change in stock market concentration, is in fact, a symptom. The cause is a change in profit expectations.

As shown in Exhibit 1, Wall Street analysts have considerably lowered their 2025 and 2026 net income expectations for the AI5. The delta between the two cohorts went from 20x in 2023 to 6x in 2026. While this is still a sizeable gap — and nominal profits for the AI5 are massive — what will matter to stock prices will be the rate of any changes versus what will have been discounted in stock prices.

Volatility is the market adjusting to new information that corrects erroneous assumptions relating to profits. One of the risks to passive investors, or any investor over-indexed to the AI5, is that prices will adjust in line with the downward estimates in analysts’ earnings expectations.

Why the analysts might be right

When a new and broadly applicable technology emerges, supply is low but customer demand is high. The imbalance leads to an outsized return on capital for the first movers. These high returns naturally attract capital, as other entrepreneurs seek a piece of the action. The stock prices of those companies rise too, creating a feedback loop and in effect inviting more entrants into the industry.

Competition rises, bringing supply to the market. But it almost always overshoots and exceeds customer demand. The cycle then begins to reverse: Pricing and returns fall, driving down stock prices.

Overproduction and deflating returns lead to industry consolidation until supply and demand reach equilibrium.

While economics lacks any immutable laws and every cycle is different, the capital cycle has repeated itself throughout history. So while we don’t know when the AI capital cycle will turn from growth to consolidation, we believe it will happen, as it has in the past. We can look back to the 1990s internet bubble for a recent example. We can also go back to the railroads in mid- and late-nineteenth-century England and the United States. And it’s happened with every other technological advance in the past 100 years, from the automobile to the radio to the telephone to the computer.

Software’s evolution

Over the past 30 years, people have bought software to help them complete tasks. Today, AI is changing software from a tool to something that completes tasks on its own. AI agents will combine information retrieval, reasoning capabilities and self-coding to evolve every piece of software and business process.

AI is in the process of redefining SaaS from software as a service to services as a software. As large language models become a commoditized raw material in the software supply chain, it will be AI-based software products that end up improving the functionality of existing software. Companies’ ability to take price will be a function of the customer’s return on the investment.

The vectors of competition in software, AI, and the broader technology landscape are just short of incredible. However, the makers of many existing software applications may experience a massive erosion in pricing power. In my view, given how over-indexed benchmarks are to assets with increasing competition due to the capital cycle, there should be much greater dispersion ahead, causing financial markets to rediscover the merits of active investing.

Conclusion

Investment vehicles, whether active or passive, are just collective pools of capital. While they may influence asset prices in the short term, over the long term it’s the return on capital that drives the terminal value of enterprises, not the flow of capital. As bottom-up fundamental investors, we assess where returns on capital are at risk due to rising competition and where they are durable due to the lack of it.

In this environment, stocks, whether public or private, facing rising competition may find it far more difficult to match profit expectations, bringing forward a different paradigm in the value of portfolio construction.

 

Robert M. Almeida is a Global Investment Strategist and Portfolio Manager at MFS Investment Management. This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It has been prepared without taking into account any personal objectives, financial situation or needs of any specific person. Comments, opinions and analysis are rendered as of the date given and may change without notice due to market conditions and other factors. This article is issued in Australia by MFS International Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 68 607 579 537, AFSL 485343), a sponsor of Firstlinks.

For more articles and papers from MFS, please click here.

Unless otherwise indicated, logos and product and service names are trademarks of MFS® and its affiliates and may be registered in certain countries.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

ASX200 'handbrake' means passive investors could miss out

Are markets broken?

The paradox of passive investing

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

What to expect from the Australian property market in 2025

The housing market was subdued in 2024, and pessimism abounds as we start the new year. 2025 is likely to be a tale of two halves, with interest rate cuts fuelling a resurgence in buyer demand in the second half of the year.

The perfect portfolio for the next decade

This examines the performance of key asset classes and sub-sectors in 2024 and over longer timeframes, and the lessons that can be drawn for constructing an investment portfolio for the next decade.

Retirement is a risky business for most people

While encouraging people to draw down on their accumulated wealth in retirement might be good public policy, several million retirees disagree because they are purposefully conserving that capital. It’s time for a different approach.

Howard Marks warns of market froth

The renowned investor has penned his first investor letter for 2025 and it’s a ripper. He runs through what bubbles are, which ones he’s experienced, and whether today’s markets qualify as the third major bubble of this century.

The challenges with building a dividend portfolio

Getting regular, growing income from stocks is tougher with the dividend yield on the ASX nearing 25-year lows. Here are some conventional and not-so-conventional ideas for investors wanting to build a dividend portfolio.

How much do you need to retire?

Australians are used to hearing dire warnings that they don't have enough saved for a comfortable retirement. Yet most people need to save a lot less than you might think — as long as they meet an important condition.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

So, we are not spending our super balances. So what!

A Grattan Institute report suggests lifetime annuities as a solution to people not spending their super balances. The issue is whether underspending is the real problem or a sign of more fundamental failings in our retirement system.

Investment strategies

The two best ways to maximise dividend income

People often marvel at Warren Buffett now getting 60 cents in annual dividends on every dollar he invested in Coca-Cola 30 years ago. What’s often overlooked are the secrets to how he achieved this phenomenal result.

Taxation

The fetish for lower taxes has gone too far

Since the time of Reagan and Thatcher, most business leaders and investors have clung to a dogmatic belief that lower taxes bring higher profits and economic growth. The truth, as always, is far more complicated than that.

Superannuation

Meg on SMSFs: Winding up market linked pensions with care

Due to recently-introduced rules, many people with old style pensions, also known as legacy pensions, will look to wind them up this year. The temporary amnesty allowing these pensions to be stopped should be navigated with care.

Property

Why our Torrens title property system hasn't been adopted elsewhere

Far from an outdated relic, Torrens title appears to be the revolutionary, cheap, low-risk way to handle property dealings. Here's a look at why this Australian invention from the 1850s hasn't caught on more widely.

Property

DigiCo REIT and the data centre opportunity

Data centres offer compelling growth prospects. But their potential hasn't gone unnoticed, and the DigiCo appears to be buying properties in a seller’s market, resulting in better opportunities being found elsewhere.

Retirement

The $1.2 trillion sea change facing Australian investors

Over the next decade, three million Australians will shift from accumulating wealth to living off it. Those taking part in the great migration need a sound strategy that delivers sustainable income and protection from market bumps.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.