Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 240

AI and an intelligent active manager’s odyssey

In spite of Artificial Intelligence's (AI) transformative potential, the investment management industry has been slow to invest in and use AI compared with other developed industries. This paper explores the journey of AI, a threat to active management that comes quickly behind the current shift to passive investment strategies.

Active management and the demand for hope

Much ink and some blood has been spilt over passive Exchange Traded Fund’s (ETF) supposed existential threat to the active management of securities and assets. While roughly one-third of all global equity management is now passive, the threat itself is overstated. Active’s survival, though in a much reduced form, is assured by the eternal demand for hope – hope of beating the market, hope of being above average, hope of not missing out. Supply to meet that demand flows willingly from active managers’ engaging and sometimes insightful narratives about exciting stocks, often hyped by new technologies.

That said, active is exposed to a deeper and longer-term threat, one that might just ‘sweep it away’. The Greek C P Cafavy’s poem Things Ended highlights how easily we miss more damaging threats:

Engulfed by fear and suspicion,

mind agitated, eyes alarmed

we try desperately to invent ways out,

plan how to avoid the obvious danger

that threatens us so terribly.

Yet we’re mistaken, that’s not the danger ahead:

the news was wrong

(or we didn’t hear it, or didn’t get it right).

Another disaster, one we never imagined,

suddenly, violently descends upon us,

and finding us unprepared – there’s no time now –

sweeps us away.

The opening gambit is Blackrock’s intention to replace all or many or some traditional active equity processes (of which Blackrock has $300 billion in assets under management) with quantitative active processes ostensibly because quant can generate alpha as successfully as traditional and at far lower cost. For many this is an old story. Most traditional managers rely on some form of computer-driven quant processes in portfolio construction and trading. Since 2010, the assets of quant hedge funds has doubled to nearly US$1 trillion, while according to JPMorgan, orders placed by computers now account for 60% of US trading volume, double the figure from a decade earlier. However, scale and market presence threaten to transform Blackrock’s initiative into an imperative for traditional managers.

A more substantial threat is lurking: Artificial Intelligence

But ‘going quant’ will provide only short-term solace. Lurking under the rubric ‘quant’ lies the more substantial threat of Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Deep Machine Learning.

The threat of AI to routine process-driven jobs is manifest even after discounting the considerable hype. But AI also threatens the jobs of lawyers, radiologists and others demanding advanced cognitive skills with its ability to recognise patterns and images, to learn, to improve its own algorithms.

In the investment management industry, both back and front offices are threatened. Eventually, AI will probably be capable of ‘thinking’ about, crafting, writing and even delivering engaging, insightful and empathetic narratives. Some AI programs already pass Turing’s Test in which interlocutors fail to distinguish between answers from a human and a computer.

Then AI too will sell hope.

Is this scenario, the ultimate disruptive one where machines make (almost) all investment and commercial decisions, pitch for business and report to clients? Or does it belong in the SciFi fantasy world? Doubtless some is fantasy, but less than we might hope for.

We tend to overestimate the short-term effects of new technology while underestimating the long-term effects. Campbell Harvey, a respected finance professor predicts that “in the end it will be a good thing for investors” if human judgement is usurped by machine judgement. When Amazon enters investment management that harsh reality may well emerge from picturesque fantasy. Indeed, Autonomous Learning Investment Strategies (ALIS) have been with us for some time though as yet they are not capable of crafting new insights or of selling hope.

AI’s co-existence with active managers

The history of technology suggests that some form of traditional active management will survive the rise of machines. The new often co-exists with the old rather than fully replacing it … quills and slide-rules notwithstanding. Co-existence will advance through human-machine interaction where human and machine in turn leverage off the other’s insights in a process of continual improvement. To thrive in that world active managers will need as yet unknown skills.

For a while at least, a traditional active approach should thrive. Traditional is likely to outperform machines in managing highly-concentrated portfolios and alternative assets, especially in heterogeneous domains where idiosyncratic risk is high and tacit security-specific knowledge is critical. To the extent that AI learns through data-mining, the relative scarcity of data in those domains favours humans.

Further, much alternative investing lacks robust, predictive theories which again favours human minds. However, both advantages will likely fade as AI overtakes the human ability to develop intuitive knowledge and insights without much data and without theories. When machines can formulate and test their own explanatory hypotheses traditional active management will raise the white flag. That fearful scenario lies ahead, as currently AI/Deep Machine Learning is poor at generalising specific information and can’t provide explanations or reasons to justify or explain its decisions (see ‘The dark secret at the heart of AI, MIT Technology Review, May/June 2017).

Currently it is a very black black-box and even blacker than the black-box inside active managers’ heads. The world chess champion Alpha Zero, given only the rules and aim of the game, learns to play chess by playing against itself many times, but can’t explain or justify its moves and tactics.

Investment management slow to invest in AI

In spite of AI’s transformative potential, the investment management industry has been slow to invest in the necessary R&D, and even slower to use AI compared with other developed industries. Investing fails to rate a mention in Stanford University’s AI Index. Failure is likely explained by the comfort induced by persistently high margins, by the industry’s capital-light structure which inhibits capital-intensive R&D, and by its much-vaunted essence as a human relationship-driven business. If Blackrock’s initiative drives lower margins, it may encourage the development of AI in active investment management. Further, the rules under MiFID II may cause an easy target as sell-side analysts become ‘AI’d’.).

Embracing the opportunity

Unsurprisingly, some hedge funds with their greater institutional and intellectual freedom have been early adopters of AI and not just to uncover previously hidden factors in capital markets but also to improve human insights and decisions. The CFA has taken a positive step by offering teaching modules in AI and Big Data. Perhaps that’s a straw in the wind. Perhaps the investment industry will sacrifice its long-protected comfort and embrace the opportunity and risks afforded by on-going advances in Artificial Intelligence and Deep Machine Learning.

 

Jack Gray is a Special Advisor and Director of Brookvine. Jack has been voted one of the Top 10 most influential academics (in his previous life as an academic) in the world for institutional investing.

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Among key trends in Australian banks, one factor stands out

The Big Four banks look similar but they are at fundamentally different stages as they move to simpler business models. Amid challenges from operating systems, loan growth and neobank threats, one factor stands tall.

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

They are six of the greatest businesses ever and should form part of the global portfolios of all investors. The market sees risk in inflation and valuations but the companies are positioned for outstanding growth.

How inflation impacts different types of investments

A comprehensive study of the impact of inflation on returns from different assets over the past 120 years. The high returns in recent years are due to low inflation and falling rates but this ‘sweet spot’ is ending.

How to manage the run down in your income in retirement

The first of five articles on modern retirement income products that aim for an increasing pension that lasts for life and on average should not decline in real terms. They are not silver bullets but worth a look.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require super funds - even SMSFs - to address retirement income and protect longevity risk.

Superannuation

How retirees might find a retirement solution in future

Superannuation funds need to establish a framework that offers retirees a retirement income solution that lasts a lifetime. It will challenge trustees to find a way to engage that their members understand and trust.

Investment strategies

Dividend investors, your turn is coming

Dividend payments from listed companies, depended on by many in retirement, have lagged the rebound in share prices over the past year. Better times are ahead but sources of dividends will differ from previous years.

Investment strategies

Four tips to catch the next 10-bagger in early-stage growth

Small cap investors face less mature companies with zero profit that need significant capital for growth. Without years of financial data to rely on, investors must employ creative ways to value companies.

Investment strategies

Investing in Japan: ready for an Olympic revival?

All eyes are on Japan and the opportunity to win for competing athletes. After disappointing investors for many years, Japan is also in focus for its value, diversification and the safe haven status of its currency.

Fixed interest

Five lessons for bond investors from the Virgin collapse

The collapse of Virgin Australia not only hit shareholders, but their bond investors received between 9 and 13 cents in the $1. A widely-diversified portfolio can tolerate losses better than a concentrated one.

Investment strategies

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

The traditional 60/40 portfolio might deliver only 1.5% above inflation in future without diversification benefits. Knowing an asset’s attributes rather than arbitrary definitions is better for investors.

Retirement

Two factors that can transform retirement investing

Retirees want better returns but they have limited appetite to dial up their risk exposure in order to achieve it. Financial advice and protection strategies in portfolios can enhance investment outcomes.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.