Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 183

Have A-REIT share prices bottomed out?

Record low bond yields have supported the valuations and profitability of Australian real estate investment trusts (A-REITs) over the past few years. A-REITs outperformed equities in 2014 (26.8% vs 5.3%) and 2015 (14.4% vs 2.8%).

The A-REIT/bonds correlation has been about -0.5% in 2016 (Figure 1), one of the highest on record. As a result, A-REIT prices have been driven down more by bond yield movements than other factors such as the real estate cycle.

Figure 1: 10 Year Bond Yields & A-REIT Total Returns: 12 Months to 31 October 2016

In recent months the yield curve has steepened as markets embrace increased fiscal stimulus from China and Japan and now the US (following Donald Trump’s election victory), and greater expectations of higher global inflation. Australian bond yields have followed, rising from a low of 1.8% in August 2016 to 2.3% at the end of October 2016. Since then, they’ve risen a further 0.40% to 2.7%.

Property trust prices continue to fall

This year, what was looking like another solid period for A-REITs is in danger of evaporating. Since the start of August, the sector has fallen 18.7% and is now down 2.8% YTD, while equity prices are up marginally YTD.

A-REITs aren’t alone. Global listed REITs in the US, UK, Singapore, and Hong Kong are down, while listed infrastructure and utilities equities have also been sold off.

Figure 2 ranks A-REITs in terms of price performance since August 2016. The largest have been hit the hardest – Scentre (SCG down 24.0%), Westfield (WFD down 20.9%), Vicinity (VCX down 20.9%), GPT (GPT down 20.6%) and Stockland (SGP down 20.1%) at time of writing.

In the hunt for yield, these large cap A-REITs have been well supported in recent years by generalist equity funds who have taken advantage of the liquidity they offer to park their money there. It is therefore not surprising that when the herd stampeded towards the exit then switched into more cyclical, growth-oriented stocks, the largest, most liquid A-REITs were hit hard.

Figure 2: A-REIT Price Movements, 1 August to 16 November 2016

With the recent sell-off, the A-REIT dividend yield has risen from 4.2% in July to 5.3%, but there is still a cushion of 260bps relative to the 2.7% 10-yr bond yield, which is above the long-term average of a 196bps spread.

The current yield is based on an average payout ratio of 84%, well below the 100% recorded pre-GFC, not that one wants to see A-REITs go back to those dark old days to boost their distribution yield.

The A-REIT sector is now trading at a price to NTA premium of circa 14%, down from 50% in July. There have been seven periods over the past 25 years when bond yields rose by more than 60 basis points. Figure 3 shows the performance of A-REITs relative to equities in each of these periods.

Figure 3: A-REIT and Equities Performance in Periods of Rising Bond Yields

A-REITs produced positive returns in only one period of rising bond yields (January–November 1994), a period when A-REITs also outperformed equities.

This time round we’ve seen the largest A-REIT sell-off compared with other periods of rising bond yields, despite the fact that bond yields have not risen as much as they did in 1998–2000 and December 2008–July 2009.

The extent of the recent sell-off is not surprising given the level to which bond yields fell and A-REIT prices rose. The dramatic bond sell-off over a short period has affected many yield-sensitive investments, and A-REITs have not been immune.

Will the pendulum swing back?

The question investors need to ask is whether the rapid rise in bonds will continue and A-REIT prices fall further, or has the pendulum swung too far, too quickly?

The A-REIT sector will remain captive to the gyrations of capital markets in the short term. Clearly, if bond yields continue to rise further there could be additional price risk.

However, the recent sell-off in the A-REIT sector has created some attractive buying opportunities. Investors with a longer-term view who can see out the short-term volatility can acquire some of the best real estate in Australia at more attractive prices than they could have three or four months ago.

Overall, A-REITs are in relatively good shape and almost incomparable to those in the lead up to the GFC. Gearing is lower (circa 30%), refinancing risk over the next few years is low (the majority of debt is due to expire in 2021 and beyond), asset quality has significantly improved, payout ratios are respectable and the exposure to offshore real estate is limited (Goodman and Westfield are the two exceptions).

Yet now is not the time to take a passive approach to the sector (i.e. indexing). We expect the variation of performance across the A-REIT universe to widen in the year ahead. Individual characteristics of each A-REIT will be more of a key performance driver than it has been in the past year or so.

Investors need to focus on those A-REITs that have quality management and can generate real value from their portfolios rather than simply relying on lower debt costs to support earnings and firming cap rates (property yields) to drive underlying asset values higher. As Warren Buffet says, “Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked.”


Adrian Harrington is Head of Funds Management at Folkestone Limited (ASX:FLK). Folkestone is a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.



Leave a Comment:



State of play in listed real estate

The case for active management in A-REITs

A-REITS are looking at M&A activity again


Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

How to help people with retirement spending decisions

Super funds will soon be required to offer retirement income strategies for members in decumulation. With uncertain returns, uncertain timelines, and different goals, it's possibly “the hardest, nastiest problem in finance".

Tips when taking large withdrawals from super

You want to take a lump sum from your super, but what's the best way? Should it come from you or your spouse, or the pension or accumulation account. There is a welcome flexibility to select the best outcome.

Latest Updates


John Woods on diversification using asset allocation

All fund managers now claim to take ESG factors into account, but a multi-asset ethical fund will look quite different from a mainstream fund. Faced with low fixed income returns, alternatives have a bigger role.

SMSF strategies

Don't believe the SMSF statistics on investment allocation

The ATO's data on SMSF asset allocation is as much as 27 months out-of-date and categories such as cash and global investments are reported incorrectly. We should question the motives of some who quote the numbers.

Investment strategies

Highlights of reader tips for young investors

In this second part on the reader responses with advice to younger people, we have selected a dozen highlights, but there are so many quality contributions that a full list of comments is also attached.

Investment strategies

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

Climate-related companies will experience exponential growth driven by consumer demand and government action. Investors who identify the right companies will benefit from four themes which will last decades.

Investment strategies

Inflation remains transitory due to strong long-term trends

There is momentum to stop calling inflation 'transitory' but this overlooks deep-seated trends. A longer-term view will see companies like ARB, Reece, Macquarie Telecom and CSL more valuable in a decade.


Infrastructure and the road to recovery

Infrastructure assets experienced varying fortunes during the pandemic, from less travel at airports to strong activity in communications. On the road to recovery, what role does infrastructure play in a portfolio?


The three prices that everyone should worry about

Among the myriad of numbers that bombard us every day, three prices matter greatly to the world economy. Recent changes in these prices help to understand the potential for a global recovery and interest rates.


Why green hydrogen is central to achieving net zero

Hundreds of green hydrogen projects show this energy opportunity is finally being taken seriously. While a cost disadvantage and technical challenges need to be overcome, it promises to deliver a path to net zero.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.