Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 644

10 fearless forecasts for 2026

As is our custom at this time of the year, we provide 10 fearless forecasts for the year ahead.

The track record of these forecasts is pretty good as you’ll see later.

Off to the races? Unfortunately, no. These forecasts are quite different from most that you read at this time of the year. Firstly, they are quite accurate. Secondly, there are not a lot of money-making opportunities in there. Thirdly, while there are not a lot of money-making ideas, there are some ideas that may help avoid some disasters.

Reading between the lines, at the heart of the forecasts, are really just some pretty commonsense ideas.

  • Stay diversified.
  • Be careful about assets that have run hard in recent years
  • Don’t chase past returns.
  • Be sceptical when reading fund manager marketing materials – particularly those promoting past returns and using dubious risk metrics.

The idea that is categorically NOT in our list of forecasts is the one that we normally see at this time of the year which is that the author has some special insights into the year ahead and will enable the positioning of the portfolio to take advantage of that.

And, we reproduce our forecasts and the outcomes of those forecasts. This is the other thing that is different about these forecasts: we hold ourselves to account.

2025 forecasts in review: 8.5 out of 10

The 2025 results were healthy with three half marks reducing the score from a perfect 10 down to 8.5. Nothing wildly wrong but not quite spot on either.

While the 2025 forecasts may not have helped readers make money, we believe that they did contain quite a lot of commonsense.

Firstly, try to ignore forecasts or recommendations that are not backed by sound data.

For example, the idea that government deficits will produce high inflation and interest rates is often spruiked around. Last year we correctly forecasted that deficits will remain high but that cash rates will fall and bonds will produce reasonable returns. In fact, the data shows that there is a very weak linkage between deficits and interest rates over meaningful timeframes.

Another widely held idea is that a struggling Australian economy may cause a major fall in the Australian dollar. Again, the data simply does not support this idea. Hopefully, readers of our forecast will have resisted the urge to lift any currency hedging they may have had in place, saving money if not actually making it.

Also in that category was the suggestion that High Yield Debt will continue to produce strong returns despite all the alarmist commentary. Another example of money saved for those who continued to hold positions in High Yield Debt of various stripes despite all the chatter.

Secondly, unremarkably, we continue to be fans of diversification whether it is to rebalance wildly overpriced and over-represented assets (eg. CBA) or to add to assets that may have been through a tough time (commercial property).

Related to our strong support of diversification was our encouragement to drop A-REITs as a benchmark for commercial property and real assets. With around 40% exposure to Goodman Group, the ASX A-REIT Index is wildly undiversified and could, if followed closely, lead to some pretty bizarre behaviour. (Like the A-REIT manager who boasted in 2024 that they beat the index by being over-weight GMG! Good stock picking but terrible risk management. If GMG had gone south, it would have be terrible on both counts.)

Hopefully, nothing in the forecasts would have encouraged any reader to make any big macro bets which, in Delta’s view, more often than not, end in tears.

Finally, if while reading any of the multitude of 2026 outlook papers you do find yourself tempted to take some action, we suggest you first check out what the data says.

How have the pundits’ forecasts worked out in the past? (And not just a sampling but all of their forecasts and for every year.) Is there any data-based evidence to suggest a real connection between what is being claimed and the suggested drivers?

If you don’t have the resources to do this work yourself, dial a friend. We will be anxiously awaiting your call!

 

Tim Farrelly is Co-Chief Investment Officer and Head of Asset Allocation at Delta Portfolios.

 

  •   7 January 2026
  • 4
  •      
  •   
4 Comments
Kevin
January 10, 2026

The financial industry has to sell product,I have no problem there.People buy these products,I have no problem there.
People make up there own nonsense and invent there own facts,I have no problem there,it's amusing. However always stick with the facts
Your point at number four for 2025 and 2026,the much hated ( by the financial industry ) CBA,shall we look at the facts.. The well diversified portfolio,much loved by the financial industry,I realise you have to say that,know your client etc..
1 sept1991 put $10 K into a Vanguard fund. This grows to $224K by 31/10/25. Source Vanguard. Things have been reasonable since then so call it $10K grows to $250K.

$10K bought you 1500 shares in CBA ($6.66 each on market) on 22-23 Sept 1991..Without reinvesting dividends then you have 1500 X $153 ( the share price approx). $229,500.
The well diversified portfolio is ~ $250 K with dividends reinvested. The concentrated CBA is worth ~ $229,500,no dividends reinvested.What provided the best results?.

The lift factor for CBA is approx 6.7. For every 1,000 shares bought back then you have around 6,700 shares now,using the DRP. The secret.? Turn that useless noise off,and do nothing.

So 1500 X 6.7 = ?. Multiply ? by $153. That would be 10,000 ( get it roughly right) X $153 .
$1,530,000. The secret? Don't listen to a fool spouting that's not complicated enough. You have to make it complicated and get it precisely wrong.

Things I worked out a long long time ago,as above The financial industry sells products,people make up their own nonsense and invent their own facts.Fools chant saving up $1.5 million is just so much easier than paying off a loan of $10 K,it must be true ,the time machine said so.

Things I'm not going to worry about,every year for the rest of my life ( and previously).
Concentration risk
Diversification
Rebalancing.
Sequencing risk
A fool that would love to land a time machine on my head,spoiler,they don't exist ( Tinkerbell effect,if we all wish hard enough !).

Let's try and and keep somewhere near reality.Compounding takes time,it isn't based on silly headlines and predictions. How many times has CBA come down in price,from memory $34 down to $24 ( the tech wreck 2003?). $62 down to ~ $26 ( the GFC). $96 down to around $68 ( when they reached a high, 2015?) ~$110 down to ~ $60 ( COVID ). Same ~ $110 down to ~ ~ $88 ( Ukraine).

Now $192 down to ,was $150 bottom,or will it go lower?. Going right out on a limb would pull backs be normal? Have we found that out yet?
If I'm here in 2041 I think CBA will produce a great return over 50 years,2031 will do,it will probably produce a great return over 40 years.I think it will produce a better return than the diversified product that must be sold.,that's all I'm interested in,good returns.

10
Graham W
January 08, 2026

An explanation to the forecast that US government bonds will outperform gold in 2026 would be nice. I can't see it myself for many reasons. The USA added another trillion in debt in just 70 days, so over 38 trillion in bonds to pay interest on.Trump wants interest rates to go down, but who is going to invest in or even renew USA treasuries at even lower interest rates. The possibility of a capital gain in bonds seems remote and far less likely than gold increasing in value in 2026.

7
Tim Farrelly
January 11, 2026

Fair question. Your logic seems sound, what could go wrong?

Two things.

Gold may fall in price, perhaps dramatically. After all, if gold is an inflation hedge and inflation is running at 3%, or 4% or even 5%, then a gain of over 100% over the last two years is, to put it mildly, over-achieving. Gold could fall 25% from here and still will have done a fine job protecting against inflation over the past three years.

To look at this another way, is there any price at which gold is overvalued? Your logic works just as well with gold at $1000, $4000 or $40000. There have been many times in the past where speculation has driven gold to unsustainable prices which were then followed by decades of falls.

Secondly, if bond rates stay where they are now, we will earn about 4% on US bonds. So gold has to rise by another 4% to breakeven with bonds.You ask, who would buy these bonds? The most likely candidate is the US government itself. If they were to embark on another round of Quantitative Easing, we could see bond yields at 2%. If that were to occur, 10-year US Treasuries will increase in price by close to 18% for a total return of 22%. If that were to occur, then gold would have to end the year at above US$5250 to break even. ( This is NOT a forecast, just a possible scenario!)

So, theer are a few ways this forecast could work out. For better or worse we will report back next year with the result.

SGN
January 11, 2026

SGN
Well Done Kevin spot on.

2
 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

CBA or global banks?

Read this before you go all in on US equities

A six-chart snapshot of June 2022 lending data

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.