Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 501

A banking crisis is here, the credit crunch may be next

There is a banking crisis playing out at the moment. On its own, it is unlikely to create major issues, but the credit crunch following the banking crisis will create the major issues.

This time is different

Dangerous words, I know. But this time has already been different. 

Banking crises usually evolve from a wave of defaults as economies slow and corporates go bankrupt. Then investors get worried about bank solvency and start pulling their money from banks. The next step is a credit crunch which makes the situation worse. Banks swimming in capital a few months earlier find themselves abandoned by investors and deposits hard to come by.

In response, banks scale back on their own lending. At the same time, they lift credit standards, only loaning to the better quality corporates. This is known as a credit crunch.

A credit crunch has the effect of making things worse. Corporations find credit hard to come by and expensive, leading to more defaults. And this is usually when we get a banking crisis. After the credit crunch, not before. 

Three paths forward

A credit crunch is not inevitable. Let's group the possibilities into: bull, bear and base cases. 

Bull case

This is the most optimistic. It relies on a 'whatever it takes' type of speech from the US central bank. There are lots of different forms this could take. Basically, it needs to keep credit flowing to the corporates. The problem is if central banks do this, they will effectively be stomping on the brake and accelerator at the same time. 

Central banks are trying to slow credit down. They are raising interest rates to slow credit growth, slow economic activity and therefore bring inflation back under control.

If they go all out quickly and in a big way, they are torpedoing the inflation goal. The bull case is not impossible. But it seems unlikely.

Bear case 

In this scenario, the banking crisis is allowed to get out of control, such as if Credit Suisse had been allowed to fall over. Or, the next major bank that runs into trouble is allowed to fall. It is the consequence of markets chasing from one questionable bank to the next to the next. Allowed to run unchecked, a full-blown, 2008-style financial crisis would occur.

But it is highly unlikely. Generals are usually good at fighting the last war. For central banks, preventing a re-run of the 2008 Financial Crisis is very high on the list of priorities.

Base case 

Central banks and regulators do enough to prevent a financial crisis. They continue to bail out and help banks where possible, but they fall short of a broad 'whatever it takes' approach. 

What does that mean? 

Bank funding costs increase. Deposits flee the smaller banks. Both have already started. 

As a consequence, banks scale back their lending. Interest rates charged are higher. Corporates bear the brunt, the US falls into recession and default rates spike. Inflation is no longer a concern. Central banks can now roll out the big guns.

Net effect: a mini-banking crisis, followed by a credit crunch, possibly followed by a traditional banking crisis. Bad for stocks, good for government bonds, not pretty for corporate bonds. 

What to watch for

The key question from here is which of the three cases is most likely, and how we are going to know which one is happening.

First, we look at surveys of credit availability. Bank officer surveys already suggest that banks were restricting credit before the latest round of bank bailouts. Some purchasing manager surveys show the same thing, but from the point of view of the corporate. 

Talking to companies directly about the issue is probably only of limited value. Companies do not want to advertise problems with funding. 

The more reliable data comes later. Credit growth data will be important. Probably not as important as early indications of bankruptcy statistics. 

Funding costs are important. Credit default swaps on banks and corporate bond spreads are two of a host of indicators. 

Where to hide

Which investments will be safe in this environment? Government bonds will be the key beneficiary of the base or bear case. Corporate bonds give a higher yield but capital loss is the danger.  

Cash will be an attractive option, but if you are over the deposit guarantee limits, choose a larger bank. In Australia, it is highly likely governments will step in and bail out depositors for a large bank.  

From a country perspective, you might need to be more nimble as most regions have their own issues:

  • US regional banks have structural reasons to be the epicentre (more loans, more concentrated deposits, more exposure to commercial property, low reserves). 
  • However, the European Central Bank has a reputation for being late when it is time to start rescuing. So Europe is not without its risks as well.
  • Australian stocks are typically a leveraged play on world growth. If world growth tanks, then the same will likely be true for Australian stocks. And Australia has a much larger banking sector relative to most other markets.

From a sector perspective, you want defensive stocks and high-quality stocks, but which stocks are truly defensive? Commercial real estate is looking a little dicey, so REITs, often considered defensive, are more at risk than other defensive sectors. Energy utilities and infrastructure can have structural issues as they transition away from (suddenly cheaper) fossil fuels, so pick carefully. 

High-quality stocks are those with high margins, low debt and good returns on capital invested. Over the last year, because of inflation, every company has been able to increase prices. The question is which companies can hold on to those price increases as demand tanks, and which will have to return the price rises. Oligopoly sectors, or those with low levels of competition, will be more likely to hold onto the price rises. Sectors with lots of players or competition are significantly more at risk.

Value is not going to save investors during this downturn. It is not the type of recession where value outperforms. This type of recession is where valuation gets hit quite hard because earnings in these value stocks will be more at risk.

Picking up a great company at a decent price 

Just as importantly, you want to have a shopping list of high-quality companies that you always wanted to buy but were too expensive. There is a good chance you will be able to pick them up at a discount. 

 

Damien Klassen is the Chief Investment Officer at Nucleus Wealth. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Reality bites

Is 'The Great Australian Dream' a sham?

A world out of sync with inflation

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

9 winning investment strategies

There are many ways to invest in stocks, but some strategies are more effective than others. Here are nine tried and tested investment approaches - choosing one of these can improve your chances of reaching your financial goals.

Latest Updates

Taxation

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

7 key charts on the state of the Australian property market

The Australian property market stirs fierce debate - often bullish optimism versus crash predictions. But beyond the noise, seven charts reveal what's really driving prices and the outlook for residential real estate.

A simple alternative to the $3 million super tax

Division 296 aims to introduce improved fairness into the superannuation system, yet is overly complex. This scours the world for better ideas and suggests a simpler alternative which can achieve the same goals.

CBA and the index conundrum for super funds

After the hyperbolic rise in CBA shares, super funds are floating the idea of carving out the weightings of ASX bank securities and indexing them within their portfolios. This looks at why that might be a big error.

Strategy

10 policies to drive Australian productivity higher

Here's a comprehensive list of proposed reforms to fix Australia's stagnating economy, including introducing a flat income tax rate, reducing migration, and making childcare tax-deductible.

Interviews

Where to find big winners in Asia

As more money looks for a home outside the US, Asia may soon get some love. Fidelity's Anthony Srom outlines the best places in Asia to invest, including in Chinese consumer names, Indian financials, and Thailand.

Investment strategies

We have trouble understanding the time value of money

We overvalue the present and underestimate the future - it’s a cognitive glitch called hyperbolic discounting. It affects savings, spending, and loans, and it's more common - and costly - than we think. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.