Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 544

Aged care star ratings are a ‘fail’

In December 2022 the Federal Government introduced star ratings for aged care homes with the aim of providing simple, reliable information about the quality of care. The introduction of the star rating system was a recommendation of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety which said that the system was needed to provide senior Australian’s and their families the ability to easily assess and compare aged care services based on measurable information.

A recent report by Dr Rodney Jilek titled “The Failure of the Aged Care Star Ratings” indicates that instead of providing the transparency older people need to compare and choose an aged care home, the star ratings may actually lead them to choose a home that is delivering poor care.

How the Star Ratings are determined

The star-rating system draws on data from the National Aged Care Mandatory Quality Indicator Program, consumer experience reports and provider compliance with and performance against the Aged Care Quality Standards as assessed by the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission.

The star ratings are based on 4 domains.

  • Quality – has the lowest weighting in the overall stars making up 15% of the rating. The quality measure uses data on five care quality indicators that operators provide to the government on a quarterly basis under the National Aged Care Quality Indicator Program.
  • Staffing – has a weighting of 22% towards the total star rating. It uses data reported by the provider on the average number of care minutes each resident receives per day and how many of those minutes are with a registered nurse.
  • Compliance – makes up 30% of the overall rating and is based on audits and non-compliance decisions made by the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission.
  • Resident Experience – has the greatest weighting contributing 33% to the overall rating. To measure resident experience the government will contract a third party to interview at least 10% of residents face-to-face about their experience at their aged care home. The interviews will be conducted annually.

Source: Department of Health and Aged Care

The failure of the ratings

The report, by Dr Jilek, compared the 501 aged care homes on the Government’s non-compliance register over 12 months from November 2022 with the star ratings those homes had received. “We targeted the homes on the non-compliance register mainly because they are supposed to be the worst in the country – they’re all non-compliant – so you would reasonably expect that they would represent the lowest ratings. What we found was that the majority of homes (300) were awarded 3 stars, which under the guidelines means that the home is providing “an acceptable quality of care”. 68 of the homes had a 5-star rating for compliance and 81 had 4-star compliance ratings, ratings that (according to the guidelines) are impossible to achieve for homes that have been deemed non-complaint.

The report gives an example of an aged care home that was assessed as non-compliant in 2020, and over the past 3 and a half years has had sanctions imposed and been required to engage external advisers. The home has remained non-compliant for three and a half years and yet has an overall rating of 3 stars, with 4 stars for compliance.

In another example, an aged care home that has 3 stars overall and 3 stars for compliance has a chequered history of compliance spanning 20 years. In 2020 the home failed 7 of the 8 standards, in 2022 the home again failed 7 out of 8 standards. Despite the history, and the fact that the home remained non-compliant, the Aged Care Quality and Safety re-accredited the home for a further 2 years.

The report concluded that the star rating system does not meet its stated objectives of improving transparency, ease of search, facility comparison or to monitor and improve the quality of aged care.

Dr Jilek describes the resident experience measure as “completely useless”, and says that “only 10% of residents are surveyed and the care provider can control the outcome by cherry picking the residents”. He says that it is hard to have certainty around the staffing and quality measures because they are based on unvetted provider supplied data, with no validation or check measure to ensure that it is correct. The only measure being independently reviewed is the compliance measure, which is the role of the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission, and they are giving homes 5 stars for compliance when they have determined that they are non-compliant.

The best research you can do

Undertaking research, such as that carried out by Dr Jilek, outside of the star ratings can be very difficult. While the list of aged care homes on the non-compliance register has a search function, it uses the name that the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission has for the home (which is often different to the name you know the home by), the variation can be small or it can be significant, but any variation to the record will result in no listing appearing.

If you are investigating an aged care home for yourself or a loved one the best way to do your research is to have a respite stay. Respite is designed to give carers a much-needed break but it is also a great way to “try before you buy”. Respite enables you to stay in an aged care home for up to a total of 63 days (9 weeks) per year. That time could be spent in one home or spread across a number of homes, which can be useful if you are unsure which home you are interested in.

A short stay of a few weeks is normally enough time for you to work out whether you like the activities, the other residents, the food and most importantly the care. Respite is also very affordable as there are no accommodation payments and no means tested fees. You simply pay the basic daily fee, set at 85% of the Age Pension, currently $61 per day plus any extra or additional service fees for things like hairdressing, wine and entertainment.

Respite is government funded so in order to get access you will need to have your care needs assessed by the Aged Care Assessment Team (normally just referred to as ACAT). The starting point is to contact My Aged Care either through their website or by telephone.

Having a simple, reliable measure of the quality of care an aged care home provides is crucial in working out whether or not you are going to get good value. Until you can have confidence in the star ratings, it’s best to do your own research.


Rachel Lane is the Principal of Aged Care Gurus where she oversees a national network of advisers dedicated to providing quality advice on retirement living and aged care. She is also the co-author of a number of books with Noel Whittaker including best-seller 'Aged Care, Who Cares?' and 'Downsizing Made Simple'.


Helen Jensen
January 30, 2024

In my experience it can be very difficult to find an aged care facility willing to offer casual respite especially if the person has high care needs. Other homes only offer respite prior to being admitted as a permanent resident and not to people requiring a couple of weeks’ respite so the carer can have a break.

January 26, 2024

My giddy aunt, is that meals and cleaning too? Why aren't surgeons, hospital admission/social workers suggesting respite care after ops. if live alone & struggle first few wks home recuperation? Not one mentioned option, only checked meals available, could I do up and down re toilet & do I have walking stick if needed? Prior shop & prepare 42 meals for freezer so no cook/lift after, almost killed as already ill. Left meal containers soak in water first 10 days until able stand at sink to washup. Respite probably exercise class in situ too so no bump on potholes re cab seatbelt over wounds to get to a class aiding recovery. Just 10 days would have helped had I known. Thank you for the information.

David Williams
January 26, 2024

Thanks Rachel. Excellent analysis. No surprises really. Before getting to the choosing stage, one strategy is to use longevity planning to identify and act on the key issues for maintaining independence and staying out of aged care for as long as possible. Potential bonus of having a longer healthy life expectancy to enjoy and saving money. And maybe giving the aged care sector more time to resolve its issues.

George T
January 25, 2024

Thank you for this information. I've been looking into aged care facilities for my mum, and have also found the ratings wonky, to say the least.

DIY research isn't easy, and I'm relying more on feedback from friends of friends, which is hardly ideal. A respite stay is likely the way to go.


Leave a Comment:



Aged care and the Intergenerational Report

The aged care recommendations that will cost you more

Why the poor will pay more for aged care next year


Most viewed in recent weeks

Meg on SMSFs: Clearing up confusion on the $3 million super tax

There seems to be more confusion than clarity about the mechanics of how the new $3 million super tax is supposed to work. Here is an attempt to answer some of the questions from my previous work on the issue. 

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 566 with weekend update

Here are 10 rules for staying happy and sharp as we age, including socialise a lot, never retire, learn a demanding skill, practice gratitude, play video games (specific ones), and be sure to reminisce.

  • 27 June 2024

Australian housing is twice as expensive as the US

A new report suggests Australian housing is twice as expensive as that of the US and UK on a price-to-income basis. It also reveals that it’s cheaper to live in New York than most of our capital cities.

The catalyst for a LICs rebound

The discounts on listed investment vehicles are at historically wide levels. There are lots of reasons given, including size and liquidity, yet there's a better explanation for the discounts, and why a rebound may be near.

How not to run out of money in retirement

The life expectancy tables used throughout the financial advice and retirement industry have issues and you need to prepare for the possibility of living a lot longer than you might have thought. Plan accordingly.

The iron law of building wealth

The best way to lose money in markets is to chase the latest stock fad. Conversely, the best way to build wealth is by pursuing a timeless investment strategy that won’t be swayed by short-term market gyrations.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Have value investors been hindered by this quirk of accounting?

Investments in intangible assets are as crucial to many companies as investments in capital equipment. The different accounting treatment of these investments, however, weighs on reported earnings and could render ratios like P/E less useful for investors.

Investment strategies

Investors are threading the eye of the needle

As investors cram into ever narrower areas of the market with increasingly high valuations, Martin Conlon from Schroders says that sensible investing has rarely been such an uncrowded trade.


Persistent, but not permanent

There is universal consensus that the Earth is experiencing climate change. Yet there is far more debate about how this will impact different economies across the globe. New research sheds more light on the winners and losers.

SMSF strategies

How super members can avoid missing out on tax deductions

Claiming a tax deduction for personal super contributions can end in disappointment if it isn't done correctly. Julie Steed looks at common pitfalls and what is required for a successful claim.

Investment strategies

AI is not an over-hyped fad – but a killer app might be years away

The AI investment trend looks set to continue for years but there is only room for a handful of long-term winners. Dr Kevin Hebner also warns regulators against strangling innovation in the sector before society reaps the benefits.


Why certainty is so important in retirement

Retirement is a time of great excitement but it is also one of uncertainty. This is hardly surprising given the daunting move from receiving a steady outcome to relying on savings and investments.


This vital yet "forgotten" indicator of inflation holds good news

Financial commentators seem to have forgotten the leading cause of inflation: growth in the supply of money. Warren Bird explains the link and explores where it suggests inflation is headed.



© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.