Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 329

ATO to shine spotlight on poor SMSF investment data

Although SMSFs hold $750 billion of Australia's almost $3 trillion superannuation system, the data on their investment allocations is surprisingly poor. There are two main sources:

* the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) produces out-of-date reports based on SMSF tax returns, using badly-defined categories (discussed in detail here).

* industry participants such as SuperConcepts, Class, Sharesight and Investment Trends provide asset allocations based on surveys or data dumps from their own clients.

While some of the attempts by industry are useful, a comprehensive report requires the ATO to improve its categories, and there are signs it wants to head in that direction. 

In a talk called 'The Regulator - putting a spotlight on what they're putting a spotlight on' to Chartered Accountants on 21 October 2019, Dana Fleming, the Assistant Commissioner SMSF Segment said the ATO was looking at changing asset categories. For example, 'unlisted trusts' provides no information on the asset class held.  

“I would love better data and granularity and hope to improve that for ourselves ... so we get better visibility of what people are actually invested in.”

The recent ATO letters

In August 2019, the ATO wrote to 17,700 SMSF trustees about their lack of asset diversification, and it sparked a flurry of activity from members. The ATO said:

“… SMSF annual return data indicated these SMSFs may be holding 90% or more of their retirement savings in one asset or a single asset class.”

In 99% of these cases, the SMSF had borrowed money to buy one asset, property. At a time of declining property prices, the concern for retirement savings was justified, but the vast majority of SMSFs do not borrow.

More importantly, another part of the ATO announcement has broader implications. About one-third, or 180,000 SMSFs, invest 90% in a single asset or asset class, and the ATO also said:

“We are concerned that these SMSF trustees may not have given due consideration to diversifying their fund’s investments and the risks associated with a lack of diversification when formulating and reviewing their investment strategy.”

Legal obligations of all SMSFs

Under superannuation regulations (section 4.09 of the SIS Act), it is a legal requirement for SMSFs to “review regularly and give effect to an investment strategy”, allowing for:

  • Risks, liquidity and likely returns from investments, having regard to cash flow requirements.
  • Composition of investments as a whole, avoiding inadequate diversification.
  • Ability to discharge existing and prospective liabilities.

SMSFs make up the largest segment of super assets at about 26%, ahead of industry funds at 25% and rapidly dropping behind, retail funds at 22%.

The asset allocations of large funds (excluding SMSFs)

Large funds invest their assets in ways shown in the following table, providing a clearer classification than available for SMSFs.

Source: ASFA Statistics

Some highlights include:

  • A larger allocation to international shares than Australian listed shares.
  • A significant investment in unlisted and alternative assets, such as unlisted property (5%), infrastructure (6%), unlisted equity (4%) and hedge funds.
  • A solid defensive cash and fixed interest allocation of 32%, often due to offering ‘balanced’ funds to their members.

Australia’s $160 billion sovereign wealth fund, the Future Fund, gives even more detail. It holds 29% of assets in global equities and only 7% in Australia, and it reports its unlisted investments in private equity, alternatives, infrastructure and timberland.

The asset allocation of SMSFs

The ATO quarterly report reports managed funds under one category without separating fixed interest, domestic and global equities. The foreign investment number is only direct equities, not including the holdings of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs), Listed Investment Companies (LICs) and managed funds in global equities.

There are four alternative sources, each useful but limited by the sample size. Researchers at Investment Trends make broad allocation measurements, while three SMSF service providers (Class Limited, SuperConcepts and Sharesight) reveal what their clients are doing. Class's SMSF asset allocation as at 30 June 2019 reports:

Source: Class Limited, SMSF Benchmark Report, June 2019

Like the ATO reports, it is difficult to identify the global equity holdings. The listed shares component can be divided into:

  • Domestic shares, 76.7%
  • ETFs, 8.6%
  • Debt and hybrid securities, 7.5%
  • Other trusts and stapled securities, 7.2%

We know from reports issued by ETF providers that SMSFs have moved rapidly into fixed income investments and global equities in the last year, which is heading in the same direction as the large funds. A wide range of listed opportunities which were not available a couple of years ago, such as infrastructure, securitised assets, corporate credit and global fixed interest, are now available in listed form on the ASX.

SMSF global equity allocation

Many global equity managers like to quote the ATO data on international investments to encourage SMSFs to place more money in their funds. The ATO data shows an allocation of only 1.4% because most global shares are held by SMSFs in local funds. The portfolio tracking software company, Sharesight, estimates 15,500 SMSFs in its sample allocate about 14% to global equities in various vehicles. Checked against SuperConcepts estimates, this figure is far more accurate than the ATO data.  

Source: Sharesight, ATO. ATO data is for the quarter ending March 2019, Sharesight is for September 2019.

Meeting the legal obligations of running an SMSF

We know enough about SMSFs to state that the majority have a diversified asset allocation, but as the ATO has said in its letters to trustees, there are many who need to consider whether their investment strategy meets the purpose of providing for retirement.

The main legal requirement is to put an investment strategy in place and to review it regularly in the context of risks, returns and cash flow needs. However, SMSF trustees have significant flexibility in their asset allocation, and if they document their strategy properly, they should be safe from ATO scrutiny, even if their assets are not well diversified. The ATO has no right to decide if an investment strategy is suitable for an SMSF trustee.

Let's at least collect accurate data. We can't hold an informed discussion on SMSF investing when we don't know what they really do. 

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

9 Comments
PJ13
October 24, 2019

I think the Investment Strategy of a single person SMSF, or perhaps even for a couple, is one area
where simply ticking the boxes should be sufficient. After all, why should the requirements be more
onerous for an SMSF as opposed to using a public/industry super fund or some "member direct"
option.

In a public fund -
1. what investment option do you choose? Enter "cash".
2. do you require insurance of any kind? Enter "No".
That's it,
In a "member direct" fund, I believe I can invest solely in, say, NAB shares. No further questions.

However, in an SMSF, it seems that I have to provide carefully-explained reasons for my choice/s. If
I have 100% of my portfolio in, for example, NAB shares, then I suspect that answers like
1. have you considered diversification? - YES
2. have you considered the risks associated with lack of diversification? - YES
3. have you considered the liquidity requirements of the fund? - YES
will not be acceptable.

I expect I shall have to write several explanatory paragraphs because the onus is on the trustee to
diversify the investments of the SMSF and if the investments are not diversified, how has the
trustee justified or counteracted the risk from being heavily concentrated in a single asset or
single asset class. Then, like in an exam, if the auditor evaluates my answers and gives them a
"fail", I shall get reported to the tax office. Really!
/Patrick

SMSF Trustee
October 25, 2019

If that's true about the investment selection in a public fund, then the rules should be changed so that they are more like SMSF's.

Not the other way around.

Graham Hand
October 26, 2019

Hi PJ13, there are incorrect statements here. 'Member direct' structures do not allow members to invest in one asset. They have rules about maximum holdings and diversification. And it's not true that an SMSF cannot hold 100% of its assets in NAB shares. If the trustee has considered the risk and circumstances, they are fine to invest this way. That's why it's called 'self-managed'. The ATO may have a view but it's the trustee's decision, just as the trustees for 'member direct' have set their rules.

Geoff
October 29, 2019

Not quite true Graham. The member direct superannuation option I have (with a retail super fund provider) will allow you to invest in a single asset - but only particular types of single assets.

They will allow you to invest 100% in ARG as a well-diversified LIC for instance, but not NAB where you're restricted to 15%.

So if the assets are regarded as being suitably diversified, such as with a large number of LICs, index ETFs and the like, then you can go "all in" if you wish. Less diversified or sector-specific LICs / ETFs, for instance VAE, are limited to 30%.

Individual shares are 15% or 7.5%, depending upon the trustee's view of the share - so a large number of shares are 15% limited including banks, telcos, retail, some miners etc., whilst smaller shares, Bellamy's (BAL) will be 7.5%.

Tim
October 24, 2019

Graham,
I hold ASX shares in companies such as CSL, COH, BHP, IXJ, MFF, MQG, RMD, etc, all of which earn most of their income overseas.
My guess this is that I am classified as being very overweight in Australian shares. The reality is that these shares, and many similar ones, are a great way to get international exposure without the hassle of opening up an international brokerage account.

Ian
October 24, 2019

Finally a bit of sense! I get really tired of being told SMSFs are under-diversified, when the data those statements are based on completely ignores all the overseas exposure we have via ETFs or LICs. Isnt it ironic that in many cases, those making the claim are often promoting something that would miss being counted in exactly the same way.

BRUCE
October 24, 2019

Graham,
A point that is always overlooked when the ATO and other non SMSF Trustees comment on the apparent asset allocation of SMSF is that their Trustees also take into account their overall tax efficiency when making a decision whether or not to invest in or outside super and most importantly they consider all their assets both inside and outside Super when looking at their overall asset allocation. Given the profile of SMSF Trustees they are very likely to have other assets ( or even expect to inherit specific assets in the future) therefore it may make perfect sense for their SMSF to have only one asset class in it. Trustees are not as stupid as the vested interests who do most of the criticising, would have people believe.
Bruce

Rob
October 24, 2019

You are correct Graham. We consider our SMSF to be c.25% invested in international equities via LICs, CDIs and NZX listed assets, yet our annual return shows it as c. 2%, and I'm sure we are not alone.

Joey
October 23, 2019

I already earn a negative rate on my bank deposits. My business account pays no interest and charges me $10 a month for admin.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Don't believe the SMSF statistics on investment allocation

ATO confirms SMSF global allocation “strongly understated”

SMSFs drop the ball on risk in asset allocation

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

A tonic for turbulent times: my nine tips for investing

Investing is often portrayed as unapproachably complex. Can it be distilled into nine tips? An economist with 35 years of experience through numerous market cycles and events has given it a shot.

Rival standard for savings and incomes in retirement

A new standard argues the majority of Australians will never achieve the ASFA 'comfortable' level of retirement savings and it amounts to 'fearmongering' by vested interests. If comfortable is aspirational, so be it.

Dalio v Marks is common sense v uncommon sense

Billionaire fund manager standoff: Ray Dalio thinks investing is common sense and markets are simple, while Howard Marks says complex and convoluted 'second-level' thinking is needed for superior returns.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 467

Fund manager reports for last financial year are drifting into client mailboxes, and many of the results are disappointing. With some funds giving back their 2021 gains, why did they not reduce their exposure to hot stocks when faced with rising inflation and rates?

  • 21 July 2022

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 466 with weekend update

Heard the word, cakeism? As in, 'having your cake and eating it too'. The Reserve Bank wants to simultaneously fight inflation by taking away spending power, while not driving the economy into a recession. If you want to help, stop buying stuff.

  • 14 July 2022

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 465 with weekend update

Many thanks for the thousands of revealing comments in our survey on retirement experiences. We discuss the full results. And with the ASX200 down 10%, the US S&P500 off 20% and bond prices tanking, each investor faces the new financial year deciding whether to sit, sell or invest more.

  • 7 July 2022

Latest Updates

Economy

The paradox of investment cycles

Now we're captivated by inflation and higher rates but only a year ago, investors were certain of the supremacy of US companies, the benign nature of inflation and the remoteness of tighter monetary policy.

Shares

Reporting Season will show cost control and pricing power

Companies have been slow to update guidance and we have yet to see the impact of inflation expectations in earnings and outlooks. Companies need to insulate costs from inflation while enjoying an uptick in revenue.

Shares

The early signals for August company earnings

Weaker share prices may have already discounted some bad news, but cost inflation is creating wide divergences inside and across sectors. Early results show some companies are strong enough to resist sector falls.

Property

The compelling 20-year flight of SYD into private hands

In 2002, the share price of the company that became Sydney Airport (SYD) hit 80 cents from the $2 IPO price. After 20 years of astute investment driving revenue increases, it sold to private hands for $8.75 in 2022.

Investment strategies

Ethical investing responding to some short-term challenges

There are significant differences in the sector weightings of an ethical fund versus an index, and while this has caused some short-term headwinds recently, the tailwinds are expected to blow over the long term.

Investment strategies

If you are new to investing, avoid these 10 common mistakes

Many new investors make common mistakes while learning about markets. Losses are inevitable. Newbies should read more and develop a long-term focus while avoiding big mistakes and not aiming to be brilliant.

Investment strategies

RMBS today: rising rate-linked income with capital preservation

Lenders use Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities to finance mortgages and RMBS are available to retail investors through fund structures. They come with many layers of protection beyond movements in house prices. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.