Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 357

Bigger companies have more females on their boards

Bigger companies are materially better than smaller companies at improving gender diversity on boards. The relationship is linear. The largest 10% of companies, ranked by market capitalisation, have on average 35% of board members being female while the smallest 10% barely reach 10%.

OpenDirector tracks 412 listed companies, analysing the composition and performance of boards. The database also includes the directors and executives of 64 superannuation funds and 30 large government entities.

The results showing declining female representation on smaller company boards is obvious in the chart below.

 

Difficulty assessing a link to performance

There are many likely reasons why larger companies are more active in promoting women to boards.

Smaller company boards are often close-knit, smaller in director numbers and comprising of the company’s executives, original founders and even family.

Fewer women on smaller company boards has a material effect on academic work which investigates whether female directors or boards with higher female representation improve company shareholder returns. It is much harder for large companies like CBA (55% female board representation) or CSL (44%) to double in size than smaller companies like AfterPay (14%) or Magellan (14%). While a more worthwhile topic is the overall board diversity, it is interesting how often the gender issue alone becomes a centre of debate.

OpenDirector analyses the performance of directors and, by default, has an aggregate index of how female directors compare to male directors. Our individual director analysis is theoretically robust in that we create total return indices for each company adjusted for company sector and size. At this stage, our preliminary data indicates that female directors do not outperform their male counterparts.

Our reluctance to publish detailed results is because bias still exists in this area. Female representation is higher in established companies than new entrepreneurial companies. If work is to be done on improving female representation on boards, a good place to start may well be increasing women on start-ups and private equity IPOs. This point is known to the experts.

Interestingly, female representation on boards is reasonably consistent across sectors. While representation is slightly lower in more ‘blokey’ industries like energy, industries and minerals, it is not glaringly so. Utilities appear to have low representation, but there are few companies in this sector.

Female representation on boards is increasing but still low. Of the 324 directors who were appointed in the last 12 months in our database, 118 or 36% were female. While increasing the average number of women on boards, these are not exceptional growth rates. As today’s CEOs become tomorrow’s directors, perhaps the more concerning statistics is that of the 34 new CEOs appointed to boards, only three were women.

 

Donald Hellyer is Director of OpenDirector and CEO of the development company BigFuture.

 

 

  •   11 May 2020
  • 2
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Why gender diversity matters for investors

Decoding the DNA of exceptional companies

Why investment stewardship matters for long-term investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Indexation implications – key changes to 2026/27 super thresholds

Stay on top of the latest changes to superannuation rates and thresholds for 2026, including increases to transfer balance cap, concessional contributions cap, and non-concessional contributions cap.

The refinery problem: A different kind of energy crisis in 2026

The Strait of Hormuz closure due to US-Iran conflict severely disrupted global energy supply chains. While various emergency measures mitigated the crude impact, the refined product market faces unprecedented stress.

The missing 30%: how LIC returns are understated, and why it matters

The perceived underperformance of LICs compared to ETFs is due to existing comparison data excluding crucial information, highlighting the need for proper assessment and transparent reporting.

Little‑known government scheme can help retirees tap into $3 trillion of housing wealth

The Home Equity Access Scheme in Australia allows older homeowners to tap into their home equity for retirement income, yet remains underused due to lack of awareness and its perceived complexity.

Origins of the mislabeled capital gains tax ‘discount’

Debate over the CGT discount is intensifying amid concerns about intergenerational equity and housing affordability. This analysis shows that the 'discount' does not necessarily favor property investors.

Div 296 may mean your estate pays tax on assets your beneficiaries never receive

The new super tax, applying from 1 July, introduces more than just a higher rate on large balances. It brings into focus a misalignment between where wealth sits and where the tax on that wealth ultimately falls.

Latest Updates

The ultimate superannuation EOFY checklist 2026

Here is a checklist of 28 important issues you should address before June 30 to ensure your SMSF or other super fund is in order and that you are making the most of the strategies available.

Retirement

Two months into retirement

A retirement researcher's take on retirement and her focus on each of her six resource buckets to stay engaged during the transition and beyond.

Superannuation

Markets have always delivered for super fund members. What if they don’t?

What happens if market resilience in the face of ongoing geopolitical tensions ends? Potential decade-long market weakness shows the need for contingency planning.

Retirement

We tend to spend less in retirement …

Studies show that a drop in expendure during retirement leads to a happier retirement. But when costs ramp up again later in life, it's a guaranteed income that makes spending more hurt less.

Shares

Can you value a share just using dividends?

A cow for her milk, a stock for her dividends. Investors are too quick to dismiss this valuation technique. 

Property

The 25-year property trust default is being questioned

The 33% CGT discount rate being floated isn’t random. It sits at the structural break-even between trust and company for the multi-property cohort. That’s driving the conversation we’re hearing now.

Investment strategies

Are active managers bringing a knife to a gunfight?

How passive investing has permanently changed market structure — and why sophisticated tools are now the price of survival.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.