Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 276

Changing landscape of US large and mid caps

Historically, an allocation to the US large cap growth category of the equity asset class, as represented by the Russell 1000® Growth Index, has presented investors with a reasonable opportunity to gain exposure to mid cap stocks. For this analysis, we define US mid caps as companies with a market capitalisation between $2 billion and $25 billion1. The advantage of this inefficiency within the asset class is that it may help to diversify a portfolio, at least from a market capitalisation standpoint. However, due primarily to the strong performance of a handful of technology stocks (and their ensuing increase in market capitalisation) within the Russell 1000® Growth Index, today’s large-cap growth investor may be less able to gain mid cap exposure through the traditional large cap growth allocation (as shown in Exhibit 1).

The increasing dominance of large caps

In our view, the dominance of the most influential large cap stocks can be better appreciated when viewed from the perspective of market-capitalisation buckets, as illustrated in Exhibit 2. Exposure to mid cap stocks in the Russell 1000® Growth Index has declined from 39% of that index in 2010 to just 14% as of 31 August 2018. Also worth noting is where this percentage change was reallocated. We have observed a significant increase in stocks with a market capitalisation greater than $300 billion in the index.

This one-dimensional shift in the market cap exposures has added an additional layer of concentration risk where over 30% of the Russell 1000® Growth Index is focused on those companies with a market valuation of over $300 billion.

Exhibit 3 puts it in perspective. In 2010, Facebook was not even a publicly traded company (IPO: May 2012), but it’s currently the sixth-largest company in the index, behind only Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and Berkshire Hathaway.

Dedicated allocation to mid caps

While the market caps for the largest growth companies have accelerated dramatically since mid-2016, outpacing mid caps, how this trend is likely to progress is uncertain. However, an allocation to large cap growth today provides far less exposure to companies further down the capitalisation spectrum. A dedicated allocation to mid cap growth may prove a key component of a comprehensive asset allocation framework moving forward.

In any market environment, we strongly believe that investors should stay diversified across a variety of asset classes. By constructing your portfolio with the awareness of how these weights shift over time, you can help ensure that your portfolio is properly diversified and that your financial strategy supports your long-term goals, time horizon and tolerance for risk. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against loss.

 

Nick Paul is Institutional Equity Portfolio Manager at MFS Investment Management, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. The views expressed in this commentary are those of the author and are subject to change at any time. These views should not be relied upon as investment advice, as securities recommendations, or as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any investment product.

For more articles and papers from MFS Investment Management, please click here.

 

Endnotes

1 Companies with a market capitalization between $2 billion and $25 billion account for 80% of the constituents in the Russell Midcap® Growth Index, as of 8/31/18.

The Russell 1000 Growth Index® measures US large-cap growth stocks.

The Russell Midcap Growth Index® measures U.S. mid-cap growth stocks. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Frank Russell Company (“Russell”) is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is a trademark of Frank Russell Company. Neither Russell nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the Russell Indexes and/or Russell ratings or underlying data and no party may rely on any Russell Indexes and/ or Russell ratings and/or underlying data contained in this communication. No further distribution of Russell Data is permitted without Russell’s express written consent. Russell does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Best-in-class, ‘pure-play’ companies give clearer focus

We have many world best practice companies

Should you be a value or growth investor?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Latest Updates

Retirement

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Interviews

Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?

Compliance

D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.

Shares

Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.

Retirement

Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.