Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 482

Fighting the last war

In November 1918, France was physically and mentally scarred. World War One was ending, yet the victory had come at an enormous cost. Of the 8 million Frenchmen mobilized, more than a million had died and another million were crippled. Eastern France had been almost continuously occupied by enemy forces for four years. Consequently, the country’s most advanced agricultural and industrial areas were devastated.

A big question emerged after the war: how could France best defend itself against future attack? The question took on greater urgency after the signing of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919. The treaty punished and crippled the war’s aggressor, Germany, yet France believed that the Germans had gotten off lightly and war would resume soon enough.

A safe France

After a decade-long debate, a key pillar of French defence against future attack was decided. It became known as The Maginot Line. The idea came from fortifications around Verdun which had worked well during World War One. They had held up to extensive artillery fire and suffered minimal damage.

The Maginot Line would be an extended series of large-scale buildings along the south-eastern French border. It would defend the region most vulnerable to attack. With the south-east fortified, France could focus on gathering forces in the north-east of the country, to get ready to enter, and fight in, neighbouring Belgium. Belgium was a key ally of France in 1930, when the building of the Maginot Line commenced.

Not as safe as assumed

France largely completed construction of the Maginot Line (pictured below) by 1936 and the country felt safe. After all, what worked in World War One had been extended and would shield the country from future attacks.

There was one problem: Germany didn’t end up attacking France via the Maginot Line. In 1940, it attacked the Netherlands, then moved through Belgium, to enter France. Germany met little resistance and France was subjected to a quick and embarrassing conquest.

After World War Two, the Maginot Line came under severe criticism both in France and abroad. In hindsight, it’s easy to pick flaws with the idea. At the time though, France thought it was learning from the recent past and applying that knowledge to the future.

Recency bias

Investors often make the same mistake that undid France. Behavioural economists call it recency or extrapolation bias. It’s a cognitive bias, or mental mistake, where investors incorrectly believe that recent events will happen again soon. Put another way, investors often overweight new events or information without looking into the objective probabilities of those events occurring in the long run.

Think of last year’s bubble price action in the likes of Bitcoin and GameStop, and how investors (or more aptly, speculators) thought the huge increases in prices for these things would continue without looking objectively at the long-term fundamentals.

To avoid the fate of France and indeed Bitcoin and GameStop speculators, it’s worth looking at recent events which investors may need to be careful extrapolating or overweighting into the future. They include:

  • Rising interest rates though everyone expects them to remain relatively low.
  • A pullback in bond prices making them attractive versus recent history.
  • The traditional 60:40 equities/bond portfolio failing miserably this year, with calls for it to be adjusted or discarded.
  • The US$ becoming ‘king dollar’ and the pound, Euro and Yen getting pulverised.
  • Growth stocks coming back and being set for further outperformance given their superior performance since 2008.
  • Most Australian superannuation funds having outperformed their benchmarks, with expectations of more to come.
  • Venture capital and private equity continuing their ascent in the finance industry.
  • Significant government debt having not been an issue (until very recently).
  • Gold being one of the few assets to have performed well in A$ terms this year, with predictions of further outperformance going forward.
  • Volatility being back. Period.

Building a durable portfolio

How can investors reduce the likelihood of them applying recency bias to their portfolios? Perhaps it’s moving in the opposing direction? Instead of overweighting recent events; underweighting them. Instead of investing in what’s worked for the past decade; investing in what hasn’t worked.

For example, since investing in growth stocks has worked since 2008, one should take the opposite tack and invest in value stocks. The trend in growth to value has ebbed and flowed throughout history and value could make a comeback.

The problem with this contrarian approach is that though many things in markets do mean revert, they often take longer than investors think. Or they may never mean revert, as a new event may prove enduring rather than fleeting.

Instead, the best strategy for investors may be a more balanced one: to be aware of mental biases such as recency bias and build a portfolio which is neither overweight nor underweight recent events. In other words, constructing a durable portfolio of investments which will perform under most, if not all, future circumstances.

 

James Gruber is an Assistant Editor at Firstlinks and Morningstar.

 

1 Comments
R S Gupta
November 08, 2022

Very good way to invest in durable portfolio

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Investing is like water, but what the hell is water?

10 cognitive biases that can lead to investment mistakes (Part 2)

10 cognitive biases that can lead to investment mistakes (part 1)

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.