Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 147

Fundamental indexing over the cycle

Due to the tendency of stock prices to over and undershoot fundamentals over the economic cycle, both finance theory and empirical evidence suggests that ‘fundamentally weighted’ equity indices (FWIs) should, over time, outperform more traditional market-cap weighted equity indices (MCWIs). It’s also the case that FWIs endure periods of underperformance, usually arising when ‘momentum’ rather than valuation-based ‘regression to the mean’ is driving market performance.

Contrast cap-weight index and fundamental-weight index

As should be clear, MCWIs weight stocks according to their price-based market capitalisation. If the combined capitalisation of stocks in the S&P/ASX 200’s Index was $1.5 trillion, and company X had a market capitalisation of $150 billion, its weight in the index would be 10%.

By contrast, a FWI weights stocks according to non-price related measures of economic importance. In the case of the FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index, for example, weights are based on four equally weighted factors: a company’s cash flow, dividends, sales and book value, with the first three of these measures averaged over the previous five years, and the last based upon the most recent accounting value.

As seen in the chart below, the upshot of this approach is that FWI’s will tend to be underweight stocks (compared to a MCWI) when their prices are relatively high compared to sales, earnings, book value and dividends, and over-weight these stocks when their prices are relatively low compared to these other non-price measures of a company’s importance.

Regression to the mean

In what’s known as ‘regression to the mean’ in value, to the extent relatively high price stocks eventually tend to underperform, and relatively low priced stocks eventually tend to outperform, finance theory suggests the FTSE RAFI Australian 200 Index should tend to outperform the S&P/ASX 200 over time.

Of course, this theory does not suggest FWIs will necessarily always outperform MCWIs. At least conceptually, the periods of over and under-performance of a FWI are outlined in the diagram below.

DB Picture2 18032016This diagram suggests that when stocks with a high price to fundamental value are continuing to outperform (as during the late stages of a speculative bull market at point B) or when stocks with a low price to fundamental value are continuing to underperform (as during the late stages of a bear market when despair is at its most extreme as at point A), FWIs will tend to underperform MCWIs.

FWIs then tend to outperform when beaten down cheap stocks rally relatively strongly in the early stage of a bull market (point C in the chart), and again when expensive stocks fall hardest in the early stage of a bear market (point D in the chart).

Simulated and actual performance

So much for the theory. Whether FWIs outperform MSWIs over time is ultimately an empirical question. Note that the FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index was launched in August 2009. Index returns prior to launch are simulated based on Research Affiliates’ non-capitalisation weighted indexing system. Actual investment results may differ from simulated results.

As seen in the chart below, the FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index (simulated plus actual) has tended to outperform the S&P/ASX 200 index over time, though relative performance has nonetheless varied over shorter time periods. Through most of the early 1990s, the RAFI Index outperformed, culminating in a strong surge of outperformance 1998-1999.

Relative Performance: S&P/ASX 200 Index v FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index: May 1992-December 2015

DB Picture3 18032016 Source: Research Affiliates and BetaShares. Graph shows performance of FTSE RAFI Australia 200 index relative to S&P/ASX 200 index, not ETF performance and does not allow for ETF management costs. You cannot invest directly in an index. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance of index or ETF.

The most abrupt period of underperformance was during the height of the dotcom bubble between mid-1998 and early 2000. But the Index then again outperformed as tech stocks crashed.

Recent RAFI underperformance

More recently, the RAFI Index has underperformed again, with a return of only 0.4% in 2015 compared to 2.6% for the S&P/ASX 200 Index. RAFI underperformed largely due to two factors: an overweight sector exposure to the underperforming resources sector, and an underweighting to the strongly performing health care sector.

In view of these cycles in relative performance, perhaps the most important statistic is that since the early 1990s, the since-inception outperformance of the RAFI Index over the S&P/ASX 200 Index has been 2.1% p.a.

Notwithstanding the recent underperformance, both finance theory and empirical evidence supports the view that the fundamental indexation strategy has the potential to add value to an investor’s portfolio.


David Bassanese is Chief Economist at BetaShares, a leading provider of ETFs. This article is for general information purposes only and neither Cuffelinks nor BetaShares are tax advisers. Readers should obtain professional, independent tax advice before making any investment decision.

BetaShares currently has two ETFs which track indices based on the RAFI fundamental indexation methodology – the BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (ASX: QOZ) and the BetaShares FTSE RAFI U.S. 1000 ETF (ASX: QUS).


Leave a Comment:



Global ETFs: insights into a multi-trillion-dollar industry

Australian ETFs: end of year reviews 2018

Active or passive ETFs: how do you decide?


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.