Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 340

Duh! Of course geared funds won, but know the risks

When The Australian Financial Review published an article called, "Australia's best fundies for 2019" on 14 January 2020, it was obviously highly popular with readers. Who doesn't love a winner?

But half of the funds listed in the Top 10 'All Funds Report' based on Morningstar's database of 9,846 funds were geared funds. Well, duh! The S&P/ASX200 Accumulation Index was up 18.8% in 2019 and geared fund borrowing costs fell to about 2%. Of course cheap leverage pays off when markets are so strong.

With many investors thinking the good times will continue, there's a temptation to gear into the action, especially with borrowing costs low. What can go wrong? 

How do investors gear into shares?

There are four main ways to borrow to invest in shares:

1. Margin loans, where the assets secure the loan but the borrower remains responsible for any shortfalls.

2. Drawings against the equity in home loans, where the loan is secured against the value of residential property.

3. Instalment warrants, where one payment is made on first investment, and then the investor can choose to make a later second payment to achieve full ownership.

4. Internally geared share funds, where the borrowing and security are managed within the fund itself with no recourse to the investor. These are the successful funds of 2019 referred to in the AFR article.

Here we focus on how geared funds work, and show the asymmetric returns.

How does gearing work?

Let's consider if the market index rises or falls 10%, how much will a geared strategy change in value?

Surely, that’s easy. Assuming a gearing ratio of 50%, if I borrow $100,000 to add to my own $100,000 and invest $200,000, don’t I simply double the return? And if the market is down 10%, then my return will be down twice as much, or 20%. I can live with that risk, so let’s go.

Sorry, it doesn't work like that.

Internally geared funds build the debt into fund structure. For example, a fund geared at 60% (the usual maximum allowed) will take $10,000 from an investor and borrow another $15,000 to invest $25,000 on behalf of the unitholder ($15,000/$25,000=60%). The interest cost is significantly lower than in margin lending because these funds borrow in wholesale markets, currently at around Bank Bill Rate plus 1%, or 2%. However, management fees are charged on the gross assets (including the borrowed amount), so geared funds gross up the fees handsomely. 

The calculation which many geared investors overlook

For a geared strategy to be worthwhile, the ungeared (or market) return must be enough to cover the interest cost plus any management costs and fees. Let's consider what happens in a strong market, which rises 10% in a year. 

The formula, which can apply to any geared investment, is:

Geared Return = (Ungeared Return – Gross Fees) - (Gearing Ratio x Interest Cost)
(1–Gearing Ratio)

The gearing ratio is the amount of debt as a proportion of total assets, and if an investor puts in $40 and the fund borrows $60 on their behalf, the gearing ratio is 60%. Interest is only paid on the borrowed amount, so the lower the gearing, the less the impact of the borrowing rate. This calculation ignores the fact that income may be taxable and expenses may be deductible.

Let's use a typical example of a geared share fund with an interest cost of 2%, a gearing ratio of 60% and fees on the gross assets of the fund of 1%. Assume the normal accumulation index (price plus dividends) rises 10% over a year.

The Geared Return will be 19.5%, being 9% return after fees (10%-1%), less the interest cost (60% of 2% is 1.2%), leaving 7.8% net return, divided by the 40% equity put in by the investor, to give 19.5% (7.8%/0.4).

(The impact of low rates is significant. If the funding cost was say 5%, the return would drop to 15%).

However, here's where the risks come in. If the market is flat, the Geared Return would be -5.5%, being the cost of 1% in fees and 2% interest, divided by the capital of 40% (-2.2%/0.4=-5.5%).

Note that these examples consider total returns, so ‘flat market’ means prices have fallen enough to offset the dividends.

If the index falls 10%, the ‘loss’ on the investor’s capital is a hefty 30.5%

The asymmetry of returns can shock investors. 

How can the loss be over 30% when the market is down only 10%? It does not seem intuitively correct. 

Consider the exact dollars. An investor puts in $100,000 and borrows $150,000 to invest $250,000. The portfolio is down 10% or $25,000. The fund charges 1% on gross assets or $2,500 and the interest cost is $3,000 ($150,000 at 2%). That’s a loss of $30,500 or 30.5% on $100,000. Oops.

By the same reasoning, many investors with margin loans during the GFC in 2007 lost 100%, even when gearing ratios were lower. They put in $100,000 and borrowed $100,000, and then their shares fell in value by 50%. Their loss was not 50%, it was 100%. All their capital was gone.

Here are the geared returns on a typical geared share fund for various levels of (ungeared) market performance (the same calculations apply to any form of gearing).

Accumulation Index (Ungeared) Geared Return Gearing Ratio (debt/assets) Gross Asset Fee Interest Cost
-20% -55.5% 60% 1% 2%
-10% -30.5% 60% 1% 2%
0% -5.5% 60% 1% 2%
5% 7.0% 60% 1% 2%
10% 19.5% 60% 1% 2%
20% 44.5% 60% 1% 2%

The point where geared equals ungeared is when the normal market is up about 3.6%, enough to cover the costs and provide an equivalent return. 

A margin loan invested on the ASX in, say, cheaper Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) or direct shares may save on the asset management fee, but the borrowing cost is much higher, making the geared returns even worse. According to Canstar, margin loan rates are currently between 4.75% and 6.73%, way above the 2% on internally geared funds. 

For example, if the market loses 10%, an investor with a margin loan at 6% would lose 33.5%. 

A geared investor needs high risk tolerance

Gearing is not for the fainthearted, especially when low equity returns are a more realistic expectation. A gearing ratio of 60% will give an investment with 250% of the volatility of the standard equity index.

The same reasoning as above applies to any geared investment, including buying the family home. Residential owners are blessed by not having daily market valuations, so they do not realise when their geared exposure has made a massive loss. Plus they tend to consider property investment longer term, especially the house they live in.

This leads to the type of mindset you need to gear into equities. It is for the highly-risk tolerant and based on a long-term strategy, because short-term losses can be severe.

Also, borrowing within super is complex and expensive, and an SMSF may not be the best structure to learn whether you have the risk tolerance.

Any gearing structure should watch for gearing on gearing. Although almost all listed companies have some level of borrowing, property funds were historically highly geared going into the GFC, and the major feature of their subsequent restructuring has been to move to lower gearing levels.

Investors need far better performance to recover from a fall than the percentage fall itself. For example, if a $1 investment goes to 50 cents, it has fallen by 50%. But to recover from 50 cents to $1, it must rise 100%. 

Next time an adviser or broker suggests an equity loan or internally geared fund, ask a simple question:

“If the market goes down only 10%, how much will I lose?”

If they don't know the answer, they will be shocked when you show them this article.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Firstlinks. He was General Manager, Funding & Alliances at Colonial First State, during the GFC, where he was responsible for gearing management (not asset selection). At its peak, CFS's geared funds held $10 billion in assets. Nothing in this article constitutes personal financial advice or considers the circumsances of any individual.

 

5 Comments
Brendan Colley
October 30, 2020

Great article thanks for writing.

James
March 19, 2020

Graham, I have an investment in a geared global fund but they don’t reveal their gearing rate but I can guestimate it from observed price changes. They won’t tell me the gearing ratio or whether it changes or let me speak with fund itself.

My question is whether I can be wiped out by a large equity rout or whether they would just change to no gearing. I understand you are now else where and also don’t offer specific advice.

Graham Hand
March 19, 2020

Hi James

You are correct that I cannot offer personal advice but I can make some general observations about geared funds. This article explains how geared funds work. In my opinion, they should maintain the gearing as described in the PDS and not reduce it to zero. Imagine if the market fell 20%, then they reduced the gearing to zero, then the market rose 20% and the fund was ungeared during the rise. Investors would rightly criticise them for incurring a geared loss but not a geared recovery.

In the example of Colonial First State, they do advise the 'target gearing' on their global funds:

"In the case of the FirstChoice Wholesale Geared Global Share option, the target gearing is 33.3%, with a usual tolerance of 5%. In the case of the other two global options, the target gearing is 55%, with a usual tolerance of 5%. The different target gearing gives investors a choice in the level of gearing available from the global options, from the lower risk 33.3% to the higher risk 55%.”




Ramani
January 15, 2020

To all those who spruik the wonders of compound interest in the Funds Management caper, luring credulous customers into areas they should avoid, here is a plea: please warn the punters that it works to their detriment in reverse. Thus a mere 2% pa over 100 years mounts up to an incredible sum, whether it is owed to you or owed by you. As with nature, maths is agnostic to its effect on humans.

Classics like 'it is not timing the market, it is the time in the market' must have their corresponding cautions blazed on bill boards: 'It is not timing your mortgage but your defaulted time with the mortgage that bankrupts you', especially in Australia where (unlike the USA) the lender can pursue the borrower if the collateral is less than the total dues. And no, the Lenders' Mortgage Insurer (paid a hefty single premium at the outset of the mortgage) will not let go, but will sue you for the amount paid out to the lender

Gearing is a sharp double-edged sword. Given the pervasive retail misconduct globally, can we teach these basics at school, please?

Glenn
January 15, 2020

And in the GFC, when property funds were more heavily geared than they are now, geared property funds fell 90% in value. But what a spectacular recovery since then if you timed it right.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

The returns to expect from gearing into shares

The best and worst managed fund of all

The decline of margin lending

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

2024/25 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ATO has released all the superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2024. Here's what’s changing and what’s not, and some key considerations and opportunities in the lead up to 30 June and beyond.

The greatest investor you’ve never heard of

Jim Simons has achieved breathtaking returns of 62% p.a. over 33 years, a track record like no other, yet he remains little known to the public. Here’s how he’s done it, and the lessons that can be applied to our own investing.

Five months on from cancer diagnosis

Life has radically shifted with my brain cancer, and I don’t know if it will ever be the same again. After decades of writing and a dozen years with Firstlinks, I still want to contribute, but exactly how and when I do that is unclear.

Is Australia ready for its population growth over the next decade?

Australia will have 3.7 million more people in a decade's time, though the growth won't be evenly distributed. Over 85s will see the fastest growth, while the number of younger people will barely rise. 

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 552 with weekend update

Being rich is having a high-paying job and accumulating fancy houses and cars, while being wealthy is owning assets that provide passive income, as well as freedom and flexibility. Knowing the difference can reframe your life.

  • 21 March 2024

Why LICs may be close to bottoming

Investor disgust, consolidation, de-listings, price discounts, activist investors entering - it’s what typically happens at business cycle troughs, and it’s happening to LICs now. That may present a potential opportunity.

Latest Updates

Shares

20 US stocks to buy and hold forever

Recently, I compiled a list of ASX stocks that you could buy and hold forever. Here’s a follow-up list of US stocks that you could own indefinitely, including well-known names like Microsoft, as well as lesser-known gems.

The public servants demanding $3m super tax exemption

The $3 million super tax will capture retired, and soon to retire, public servants and politicians who are members of defined benefit superannuation schemes. Lobbying efforts for exemptions to the tax are intensifying.

Property

Baby Boomer housing needs

Baby boomers will account for a third of population growth between 2024 and 2029, making this generation the biggest age-related growth sector over this period. They will shape the housing market with their unique preferences.

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: When the first member of a couple dies

The surviving spouse has a lot to think about when a member of an SMSF dies. While it pays to understand the options quickly, often they’re best served by moving a little more slowly before making final decisions.

Shares

Small caps are compelling but not for the reasons you might think...

Your author prematurely advocated investing in small caps almost 12 months ago. Since then, the investment landscape has changed, and there are even more reasons to believe small caps are likely to outperform going forward.

Taxation

The mixed fortunes of tax reform in Australia, part 2

Since Federation, reforms to our tax system have proven difficult. Yet they're too important to leave in the too-hard basket, and here's a look at the key ingredients that make a tax reform exercise work, or not.

Investment strategies

8 ways that AI will impact how we invest

AI is affecting ever expanding fields of human activity, and the way we invest is no exception. Here's how investors, advisors and investment managers can better prepare to manage the opportunities and risks that come with AI.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.