Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 127

Mortgage funds: if only we had a trendier name, like P2P

When was the last time you saw a positive story about a mortgage fund in the financial press?

The only time a mortgage fund or its operator is mentioned in the press these days is to chronicle what went wrong in the wake of the GFC, detail the mismanagement that took place and update the public on the progress of the multitude of court cases being brought about by ASIC and others.

There is no denying that, post-GFC, some operators of mortgage funds have been shown to be foolish or greedy at best and, at worst, criminal. However, the GFC brought into focus a lack of corporate governance, excessively risky management decision-making and misleading marketing practices across a whole range of industries and asset classes.

Post-GFC, almost every other asset class has been allowed to reform itself and prove to the investing public that it has changed and is worthy of a second chance. Mortgage funds do not appear to have been afforded this same opportunity. Instead they seem to have been consigned to a purgatory of mistrust.

Contrast this situation with the burgeoning crowdfunding and P2P (peer-to-peer) lending industries. In the many newspaper columns dedicated to these industries, the coverage is almost universally positive. There are few questions being asked about whether these platforms are actually offering an acceptable risk-adjusted return to the investor. Interest in digital methods of raising capital seems to have reached the point where the mode of capital raising is of more interest than the investment itself.

Sometimes I joke that if I operated my fund through a fancy online presence and called myself a P2P lender, I would be hailed as one of the ‘entrepreneurs’, the ‘innovators’ seeking to ‘disrupt’ the banking industry, a modern day Robin Hood hell bent on ‘democratising’ property-related financing and bringing it to the masses. Instead, as my business only has a modest online presence and our fund is called a ‘mortgage fund’, it is largely disregarded. Am I the only one that sees this contradiction?

This article seeks to dispel the idea that all mortgage funds are bad news. Choosing to disregard all debt-based investments because of the historical bad behaviour of a few is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

A common misconception about debt

People seem to find it difficult to differentiate between the risks of taking on too much debt as a borrower and making an investment that is backed by a debt.

Many people would have little hesitation in investing in either a commercial property syndication leveraged at 60% or buying a residential investment property leveraged at 70%. These investments would probably be considered relatively conservative. However, if the opportunity is presented to invest in a loan that is secured by a first registered mortgage over that same commercial property leveraged at 60% (or the residential property at 70%), many of those investors would consider it a very risky proposition. This attitude fails to appreciate that the debt position secured by a first registered mortgage within the capital stack is the lowest risk – it is actually the equity component that provides the debt investors with their first loss buffer.

For example, consider a residential investment property purchased for $800,000 using 70% leverage:

Now consider the position if the value of the investment property falls by 15%:

As you can see from this simple scenario, if you are an investor in the equity component of the capital stack you have lost 50% of your equity. However, if you are an investor in the debt component then 100% of your investment is preserved and there is further buffer to protect your investment from any further deterioration in the underlying asset value.

Not all mortgage funds are created equally

Although they are often thrown in the same bucket, there are actually three quite distinct structures that fall within the ‘mortgage fund’ moniker: debenture issuers, pooled mortgage funds and contributory mortgage funds. For example, a contributory mortgage fund gives the investor control over which mortgage funding opportunities they invest their money in. These different structures may bring about different investment experiences and outcomes.

The GFC highlighted the frailty of some debenture structures as well as the misleading claims used to promote pooled funds. Neither of these structures were able to deliver on the promises of their pre-GFC marketing flyers. In contrast, contributory mortgage funds emerged from the GFC relatively unscathed.

Moving forward, I believe contributory mortgage funds will become the preeminent structure within the mortgage fund industry, pooled mortgage funds will continue to have their place but will be accompanied by more modest claims as to their liquidity whilst debenture structures are unlikely to remain viable.

Changes in the banking landscape has created opportunities

The Australian banking landscape has undergone enormous change since the onset of the GFC. Consolidations have occurred within Australian banks, global banks have withdrawn or moved toward niche markets, and new macro prudential controls continue to be introduced.

These factors in combination have led to a situation where banks are highly selective in terms of the type of lending that they do, and have tended to favour residential home loans at the expense of commercial loans. Accordingly, well credentialed borrowers who would previously have been able to access bank finance are now turning to private finance or are unable to have their funding needs met at all.

This shift in the banking landscape has created a fertile environment for the mortgage fund industry and the providers of private finance.

Conclusion

Whilst P2P lenders may promise returns of 8 to 10% per annum, which sounds attractive as a headline, these loans are typically unsecured. By contrast, many mortgage funds also offer returns of 8 to 10% per annum but secured against a first registered mortgage over real property.

 

Lachlan Perks is the Co-Founder and Director of Keystone Capital, manager of a contributory mortgage fund designed for wholesale clients. Lachlan is also the Managing Director of property funds management business, PPI Funds Management.

This article does not constitute formal advice and contains general information only. It does not consider the individual needs of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Is a debt bonfire building?

Defaulting into a world without growth

Financial leverage in real estate: friend or foe?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Raising the GST to 15%

Treasurer Jim Chalmers aims to tackle tax reform but faces challenges. Previous reviews struggled due to political sensitivities, highlighting the need for comprehensive and politically feasible change.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

9 winning investment strategies

There are many ways to invest in stocks, but some strategies are more effective than others. Here are nine tried and tested investment approaches - choosing one of these can improve your chances of reaching your financial goals.

Latest Updates

Taxation

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

7 key charts on the state of the Australian property market

The Australian property market stirs fierce debate - often bullish optimism versus crash predictions. But beyond the noise, seven charts reveal what's really driving prices and the outlook for residential real estate.

A simple alternative to the $3 million super tax

Division 296 aims to introduce improved fairness into the superannuation system, yet is overly complex. This scours the world for better ideas and suggests a simpler alternative which can achieve the same goals.

CBA and the index conundrum for super funds

After the hyperbolic rise in CBA shares, super funds are floating the idea of carving out the weightings of ASX bank securities and indexing them within their portfolios. This looks at why that might be a big error.

Strategy

10 policies to drive Australian productivity higher

Here's a comprehensive list of proposed reforms to fix Australia's stagnating economy, including introducing a flat income tax rate, reducing migration, and making childcare tax-deductible.

Interviews

Where to find big winners in Asia

As more money looks for a home outside the US, Asia may soon get some love. Fidelity's Anthony Srom outlines the best places in Asia to invest, including in Chinese consumer names, Indian financials, and Thailand.

Investment strategies

We have trouble understanding the time value of money

We overvalue the present and underestimate the future - it’s a cognitive glitch called hyperbolic discounting. It affects savings, spending, and loans, and it's more common - and costly - than we think. 

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.