Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 136

Results from the 2015 Reader Survey

Our thanks to the 1,161 readers who completed our Reader Survey. This is a great response and the feedback provides valuable guidance for us.

Cuffelinks is a community of investors sharing ideas, and in the spirit of openness, we attach all the charts representing the answers, and comments from two of the questions. We have edited out only some personal references in the interests of privacy and confidentiality, and we have not touched the spelling or grammar.

The bar charts on responses to every question are linked here.

The verbatim comments from the two questions that required a written response can be accessed here: Question 5 'How is Cuffelinks different from other financial newsletters and websites?' and Question 12 'How can we make Cuffelinks more useful to you, plus other general feedback?'.

In brief, some of the findings are:

  • Almost 50% of our readers identify themselves as SMSF trustees while 30% are investors without an SMSF and 30% are retired from paid work (multiple selections were allowed so the numbers add to more than 100%). Industry professionals make up about 40% of respondents, many of whom would also manage an SMSF.
  • 70% say the length of our articles is about right, while 17% say it depends on the subject. Overall, we think we are writing appropriately in length for our audience.
  • 80% say our articles are easy to understand, while another 20% say it varies by week.
  • 91% say our content is credible and professional, and we hope we are selecting the best writers for our audience and aspirations.
  • There is decent support for macro and economic forecasting, so we will explore that further in 2016. Podcasting, conferences and webinars received solid interest, but not too regularly. There is not a high expectation that we will provide stock picking, but there’s some interest.
  • Almost 70% have shared Cuffelinks with a friend. Thank you very much, the word-of-mouth support is crucial for our growth.
  • The most popular asset classes for allocation in the last year were domestic equities, global equities and term deposits. Alternatives had a respectable 5% but are not yet mainstream.

Readers value our independence and variety of expert opinions, and want us to avoid overt product promotions. There is recognition of our focus on quality of analysis and information rather than grabbing the headlines or reporting the daily noise. We sometimes worry our articles err on the side of being too technical, as they are written by market professionals, but this does not seem to be an issue for most. Hopefully, each edition has something for everyone.

We appreciate the time many of you took to complete the survey.

From the team at Cuffelinks

Chris, Graham, David, Ashley and Leisa

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Reader feedback from our 2024 survey

Reader feedback from 2017 Survey

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.