Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 134

Retirement: Making income the outcome

The consensus is that retirement income should be the primary goal of superannuation and the federal government plans to enshrine an objective in legislation. This will require a change in focus for investment managers around the risks they manage and the options they provide to investors.

In its response to the Financial System Inquiry, the government also agreed to remove impediments to retirement income products and for the publication, where practical and cost-effective, of income projections on members’ statements.

As always, the devil is in the detail. While publishing income projections is a good idea, it must be meaningful for investors.

That means participants should be able to see not only what they may be able to afford in retirement, but the uncertainties around those projections. They should be given investment options to help manage those uncertainties so that confidence in the income projections increases as they near retirement.

If their plans are not on track, they need to be made aware of their options, whether it is saving more, working longer, or otherwise adjusting their expectations for retirement.

We also must be mindful of the nature of the risks that may affect retirement income. If the solution is not managing market risk, inflation risk and interest rate risk, are the income estimates actually useful?

Managing the right risks

If income is the goal, we need to think about risk management in different ways. Currently, many of the options offered to savers may be managing non-crucial risks, sacrificing asset growth goals with no clear benefit relative to an income goal.

If the volatility of an account balance is all that is managed, employees will not be in a position to know how much inflation-adjusted income that balance can provide when they retire.

Just about everyone who saves or invests does so to support some future consumption. We know that the key to any asset allocation is to identify the right hedging asset for a given liability.

So if you want to reduce the volatility of your account balance, you can invest in assets that are stable in wealth terms, like term deposits or short-term fixed interest. But short-term fixed interest is the wrong hedging asset if you are seeking to manage lifetime income risk. Instead, you end up accepting a lower expected return with no clear benefit relative to an income goal.

Figure 1, using US data as an illustrative example, shows how risk and return characteristics differ when looked at through an income lens.

GL Figure 1 Monthly Return

GL Figure 1 Monthly Return

The left-hand chart shows that when managing the volatility of an account balance, short-term government bonds are a fine hedge. But the right-hand side shows if you are managing toward income, those same securities become much more volatile.

To hedge a retirement income liability, we need to devise a solution that manages relevant risks – among them rising inflation and interest rates.

We can conceptualise our retirement liability as a series of equal inflation-adjusted payments from retirement to life expectancy.

This future liability looks a lot like a bond. The series of payments, like any bond, has a duration. By investing in a portfolio of inflation-protected instruments that match the duration of those payments, we construct a strategy that hedges interest rate and inflation risk.

DB, DC and a middle way

The idea of buying assets today that hedge a future liability is called ‘liability-driven investing and is an approach that is commonly used among the old defined benefit (DB) pension plans that used to prevail before the introduction of defined contribution (DC) superannuation in 1992.

A DB plan is designed to provide a predetermined retirement benefit to members either in the form of a specific dollar amount or as a percentage of compensation. In a DC plan, individuals contribute to their fund through their working lives, but they do not know how that may translate to supporting income once they stop working.

There are a number of advantages in DC plans, such as member control and better portability. But the individual carries all the investment risk and must make often complex asset allocation decisions with little or no expertise.

A middle way is to use two key principles established by lifecycle research in financial economics.

The first principle says that investors derive utility from being able to afford a steady stream of consumption through retirement. The risk management framework should be designed to deal with uncertainty risk around that goal.

Every asset allocation involves a trade-off between growth assets and risk-hedging assets. If the goal is retirement income, the right measure of risk is uncertainty about income. And the right trade-off is between income risk management and the opportunity of growing income.

The second principle is that investors should make saving and asset allocation decisions based on various sources of capital throughout their lifecycle.

Fund members have two main sources of capital to fund future consumption - today’s financial assets and expected future savings from their human capital. For most investors, the human capital component tends to be less risky than equities.

At the beginning of members’ working lives, they tend to have little financial wealth. The majority of their total wealth consists of future savings from human capital. As time progresses, members convert future savings into financial assets.

So the right asset allocation approach should be to manage the trade-off between assets for income-growth (increasing the balance available to draw income from) and assets for income risk management.

This relationship drives changes in the allocation to income-growth and income risk management assets. Early in life, the focus is on income-growth assets. Later, as human capital is depleted, the focus shifts to income risk management assets – duration-matched inflation-protected securities. Figure 2 below shows how this might work.

GL Figure 2 Making the Risk Return

Summary

The primary goal of retirement savings should be to provide a steady stream of income for people when they stop working. So a primary risk for people is uncertainty about how much income they can afford in retirement.

An ideal solution would allow participants to invest toward retirement income over time, and seek to protect those investments from inflation and market risks.

Providing relevant information to investors alongside solutions that manage the right risks can be a powerful combination in pursuing better retirement outcomes.

 

Graham Lennon is head of retirement investment strategies and a senior portfolio manager in Sydney with Dimensional Fund Advisors, a wholesale asset manager with more than $500 billion under management globally. This article is for general educational purposes only and does not consider the needs of any individual.

 

6 Comments
Shylock
November 15, 2015

After reading way too much from the "experts" I am now exhausted. The super industry needs your money for as long as possible; commissions pay the rent etc.

Planning to live to 100 ?? Not me !

Personal research has shown that none of my family & friends' elderly have made it into the nineties, most die in the late seventies, the old six score and ten.

So I do not plan to live past 80, this makes planning pension/income easier for me.

Again from family/friends' experience I find that most of the income is needed in the first 5 to 10 years of retirement when cars, house upgrades and o/s vacations are bought. Again helps me with income planning.

Very few elderly in their eighties have a car or licence to drive one, no longer travel overseas or upgrade their wardrobe to the latest fashion.

This might all sound overly simplistic, but I challenge you to observe your elderly family and friends and see for yourself; you will see your future staring back at you; not always pleasant.

Don't worry, be happy; retire as soon as practicable and enjoy some good years while you can. After all you have already given your best years to the company and now it is your time to smell the roses and spoil/play with the grandchildren.

Make love in a hammock; if you still can.

Alternatively, keep working till you drop, this will make your kids wealthy and maybe they will have learnt from you to retire sooner rather than later.

What is the worst that can happen ?? You may have to return to work ??Big deal !!... Not something new for any of us oldies.

Tortoise
November 14, 2015

One thing with these analysis, is that they don't mention the return you receive for this "protection". The rates on US inflation hedged instruments arent really compelling. If you have a few million saved they may work for you.

Fay
November 13, 2015

When you talk about income risk management assets, namely duration-matched inflation-protected securities, do such things actually exist? Also if you don't know when you will be retiring (it often isn't by choice), at what age should you shift funds out of growth assets?

John K
November 16, 2015

Fay - FYI, You can buy long-dated inflation linked government bonds but they pay "stuff all" interest. To increase your general knowledge search for "Indexed Annuity Bonds". These are mainly infrastructure bonds and I've bought several going out to 2035 (when I'll be 90 or dead) , they pay inflation plus up to 3% at the moment , as an example look at "JEM Southbank" which is for the Brisbane Institute of Technology.
As to when you should move money out of growth assets, it depends how much money you have and how risk averse you are. I retired at 54 and started moving out of growth assets at 67. I sleep better now!.

Fay
November 18, 2015

Thanks John. When I looked into bonds many years ago there was no real way of selecting particular durations, despite much of Finance IIIB being devoted to learning how to calculate it. Another case of reality taking its time catching up with theoretical models.

Laurent
November 12, 2015

More and more people disagree with that point of view and raise the issue of "longevity risk" = If you retire around 60, it is likely that you will live 30 more years, possibly even longer with future medical progress.

If you change your asset allocation to inflation-protected securities (i.e. bonds), you may run out of money too quickly. Many now recommend a more aggressive asset allocation (i.e. equities). The best paper I read on the subject was written by Wade Pfau and Jeremy Cooper "The Yin and Yang of retirement income philosophies". You can find it on the Internet, it is mandatory reading.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

$1 million is never worth less than $500,000

The comprehensive income product for retirement

Super is delivering for people about to retire

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reason to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies will benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated investors' can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.