Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 106

Retirement catches most people unplanned

Few issues in retirement planning have received more attention in recent years than life expectancy and longevity. Most people can expect to live to 90 or 100 years, which could mean 30 years in retirement, financed by either a meagre government pension or personal resources.

It’s understandable that people do not worry about retirement savings while in their 20s and 30s, and even into their 40s with children and mortgages to worry about. But research on Australian retirement by three academics, Julie Agnew, Hazel Bateman and Susan Thorp, leads to the following conclusion:

We find that more than half of Australians in their 50s and 60s have not planned key aspects of retirement. A small minority have detailed and advanced plans. In addition, expectations around these issues and actual realisations may not be well matched.

Work, Money, Lifestyle: Plans of Australian retirees, JASSA Finsia Journal of Applied Finance, 2013

A minority choose their own retirement date

The survey asked 920 Australians aged between 50 and 74 years about their knowledge, values and plans around retirement age. The majority of not-yet-retired had done virtually no planning for the transition to retirement, perhaps because they expected to decide for themselves when they would stop paid work. However, of those who were already retired, only 40% said they decided their own retirement date, while 60% were either forced to retire or encouraged out of the workforce, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Relative ranking of reasons for retirement by already-retired peopleGH Chart1 240415

GH Chart1 240415

(The bar lengths are determined by counting the number of times people ranked the reason as ‘most important’ and then deducting the times when it was ranked ‘least important’. Survey respondents were shown sets of statements listing the reasons for retirement and were asked to choose the one that most applied to them and the one that least applied to them).

As Figure 1 shows, the most important reason to retire was ‘I wanted to do other things’, but factors beyond the retirees’ control, including personal health and unwelcome work environment, were major factors in retirement. As the authors state, “The likelihood that events outside one’s control determine retirement timing makes advanced financial preparation more critical.”

Figure 2: Financial planning by labour force status, % of sampleGH Chart2 240415

Only 48% of Australians aged 50 to 65 years have attempted to work out how much money they will need for retirement. About one in three has a firm plan on how they will reach their retirement needs. It’s not surprising then that about half of pre-retirees expect their standard of living to decline in retirement.

Activities and lifestyle

The survey also revealed that about 40% of pre-retirees had given little thought to what they might do in retirement. For those who made plans, travel and leisure activities were priorities. Those who had already retired reported carer responsibilities and volunteering had been more important than anticipated. Of those who had returned to work, most said it was for work enjoyment rather than needing the money.

So while there is generally a lack of planning for retirement, Australians are looking forward to more travel and leisure. Let’s hope they've got the money to enjoy those retirement years, because there will be far more years than most of them expect.

 

Graham Hand is Editor of Cuffelinks and has worked in the finance industry for 38 years.

RELATED ARTICLES

The reality of three phases of retirement

We need national and personal visions for retirement

Living the lifestyle you want in retirement

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.