Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 321

Six suspects in the murder of inflation

What happened to Harold Holt? How did we allow mullets to become fashionable? Who murdered inflation? These are some of Australia’s greatest mysteries, and economists have felled many a tree in recent years expressing their bewilderment that inflation has vanished without a trace.

The whereabouts of inflation in Australia and other major economies has been a monetary mystery for more than a decade now. According to economic theory, low interest rates should increase consumption and borrowing, increasing demand and resulting in higher prices. According to economic theory, low unemployment should force employers to offer higher wages as a way of competing for scarce talent. So, who could be responsible for the murder of inflation?

We’ve enlisted the assistance of Hercule Poirot, Sherlock Holmes and Jacques Clouseau to narrow down a list of suspects:

Suspect 1 - Amazon Armageddon: Increased globalisation has resulted in many Australian businesses having to keep prices low to remain competitive. This is particularly relevant for Australian retailers, who are struggling to keep up with the likes of Amazon.

Suspect 2 – The Grocery Wars: The price war between Coles, Woolworths and Aldi has helped keep a lid on inflation. A PwC report found that Aldi’s presence in the Australian market has resulted in Australian shoppers saving more than $2.5 billion per year.

Suspect 3 - Follow the Money: The RBA has been lowering interest rates since November 2011. Total credit in the economy has increased by $890 billion since then, with housing loans accounting for 70% of that new debt. Australians didn’t respond to lower rates by taking out more personal and business loans and stimulating economic activity as the RBA may have hoped, choosing instead to borrow up to their eyeballs in housing loans. At least there was inflation in property prices!

Suspect 4 - Underemployment: The ABS considers someone employed if they work more than one hour a week, meaning that low unemployment figures may be misleading. Underemployment, which measures workers who are employed but want to work more hours, is historically high. It should be no wonder that wage growth is non-existent when there are more than a million Australians looking for more work.

Suspect 5 - Not just call centres: Cheap foreign labour is typically associated with the decline of Australian manufacturing jobs, however thousands of white-collar jobs in Australia have been lost to ‘outsourcing’ (corporate Australia loves a euphemism!). As profit margins get squeezed, Australian companies can save up to 70% on wages by shipping low-skill jobs overseas. This trend will only accelerate as the quality of foreign labour increases, with high-skill white-collar jobs increasingly at risk.

Suspect 6 - Running out of luck: The Australian economy remains anaemic, as reflected by its woeful productivity growth figures and per-capita recession. China is building 20 million square metres of new floor space each month – for reference, the total floor space of Sydney’s CBD is 17 million square metres. If China decides to stop building a new Sydney CBD each month, the demand for our major commodities will plummet and our much-treasured streak of 27 years without a recession will almost certainly end.

Who do you think pulled the trigger? Did the suspects work in cahoots? Were there other accomplices? Despite having a rock-solid alibi, the RBA appears to have pinned the murder of inflation on interest rates being too high. Sherlock Holmes once warned that we should twist our theories to suit facts and not the other way around. Rather than relying on conventional economic wisdom to solve this mystery, we should ask ourselves a simple question – why would prices and wages be rising in the first place?

Lowering interest rates further does nothing to improve the Australian economy, which needs major reforms to improve the quality of its labour force and business conditions. Although it is undoubtedly a foreign concept to them, our dear leaders in Canberra may actually need to stop sharpening their knifes and do some work. At this stage, we may as well save on the labour costs and outsource our politicians to the Philippines!

 

Nicholas Stotz is Investment Research Analyst at advisory firm, Stanford Brown. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual investor.

 

5 Comments
Stuart
September 05, 2019

Great article. Did you miss demography? Extending lifetimes and health, Too many retirees or early retirees causing the money cycle to bog-up as they assume living healthy life to 99 and sit on savings accordingly.
Although the counterpoint is reducing % of population of working age would push inflation higher (but that has been counterbalanced by net immigration).

Gary Judd QC
September 01, 2019

Aren’t the economic laws concerning supply and demand the relatively simple and obvious answer to the question?
Increase the quantity of goods and services whilst keeping the money supply the same and prices should go down. Lowering interest rates, and QE more so, increases the money supply. If equilibrium occurs prices should remain the same.
If the increase in the money supply exceeds the increase in the quantity of goods and services, prices should go up.
Prices as measured by the CPI haven’t gone up much because the quantity of those goods and services has increased, but prices of many other goods and services which are not measured by the CPI, have increased. Mainly those where there are constraints on supply such as land and buildings. And other assets such as bonds and shares which have been in high demand because interventions by the government and its agencies have disincentivised reliance on traditional savings vehicles.
If the market were allowed to operate without interventions, these distortions would not exist.
Prices of CPI goods and services would have decreased. Asset prices would not have skyrocketed. This would have been good, not bad.

Nicholas Stotz
September 02, 2019

Hi Gary,

Completely agree with your comment, as up until recently I was a card-carrying libertarian (I can still watch Thomas Sowell videos for days). All of my points above boil down to supply and demand issues (e.g. higher supply of providers selling consumer goods capping prices, higher supply of global labour putting pressure on wages, etc).

Couple of comments to add:
- Increasing the money supply should increase the price of goods, assuming that the velocity of money stays the same. It's all well and good for Josh Frydenberg to say that we consumers should spend their tax cuts and that companies should increase their investment in Australia, but if the economy was healthy consumers and companies wouldn't need any encouragement. To me that's evidence of a weak velocity of money.
- I'd argue that we have low inflation because we've allowed the market to operate without interventions. Yes we have a major distortion in terms of interest rates, but for the most part we've allowed consumers and companies to freely choose lower cost alternatives (Amazon, low-cost foreign labour, etc). The taming of inflation in recent decades probably has more to do with the liberalisation of the Australian economy than any interest rate decisions made by the RBA.

Cheers,
Nic

Dave
August 29, 2019

I love the last sentence in your article. If only

Nicholas Stotz
August 30, 2019

We can dream Dave!

Hope you enjoyed the read.

Cheers,
Nic

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Which companies will do well in the turmoil of 2020?

What is the likely effect of COVID-19 on the Australian economy?

Why August company reporting season was poor

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Four simple things to do right now

Markets have recovered in the last six months but most investors remain nervous about the economic outlook. Morningstar analysts provide four quick tips on how to navigate this uncertainty.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 374

Suddenly, it's the middle of September and we don't hear much about 'snap back' anymore. Now we have 'wind backs' and 'road maps'. Six months ago, I was flying back from Antarctica after two weeks aboard the ill-fated Greg Mortimer cruise ship, and then the world changed. So it's time to take your temperature again. Our survey checks your reaction to recent policies and your COVID-19 responses.

  • 9 September 2020

Reporting season winners and losers in listed property trusts

Many property trust results are better than expected, with the A-REIT sector on a dividend yield of 4.8%. But there's a wide variation by sector and the ability of tenants to pay the rent.

Have stock markets become a giant Ponzi scheme?

A global financial casino has been created where investors ignore realistic valuations in the low growth, high-risk environment. At some point, analysis of fundamental value will be rewarded.

Every SMSF trustee should have an Enduring Power of Attorney

COVID-19 and the events of 2020 show why, more than ever, SMSF trustees need to prepare for the ‘unexpected’ by having an Enduring Power of Attorney in place. A Power of Attorney is not enough.

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 376

The US tech index, the NASDAQ, peaked on 2 September 2020 at 12,058 and closed three weeks later at 10,793. On the same days, Apple hit US$137.98 and then fell to US$110.08. These falls of 10% and 20% seem high but both were simply returning to their early August levels. It's hardly a rout when a month's gains are given back. The bigger issue is whether such a stock correction will scare off the retail 'Robinhood' traders.

  • 24 September 2020
Interviews

Interview Series: What’s new in a global innovation fund?

For many global tech companies, COVID has boosted their revenues and pushed share prices to all-time highs. We are on the cusp of amazing technical advances and there are plenty of new opportunities.

Shares

Five reasons why Tesla is the everything bubble embodied

As fewer professionals actively research the merits of a company’s prospects, stocks become disproportionately driven by capital flows. Prices disconnect from fundamentals and there's no better example than Tesla.

Retirement

Three retirement checks for when you have enough

Not every retiree needs to gun for higher returns, but a conservative portfolio can court its own risks, especially with bond rates so low. But some retirees prefer to settle for a lower income.

Shares

Hide and seek: the FX impact on global equity investments

As more Australians tilt their investments to global equities, they often overlook the exchange rate risk and fees. The move from US57 cents to US73 cents in six months shows the unhedged impact.

Economy

When America sneezes, the world catches a ...

The recovery from COVID-19 is looking more like a K-shape, with some companies doing well while others struggle. The pandemic seems more akin to a black swan, exogenous shock than a structural downturn.

Retirement

How the age pension helps retirees cope with losses

It's often overlooked how wealthier couples can fall back on the age pension if a market loss hits their portfolio. The reassurance is never greater than in a financial (and now epidemic) crisis.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.