Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 521

The drawbacks for SMSFs moving funds into cash

Investment trends can sometimes be hard to pick, but the huge and ongoing investor cash inflows into Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) that invest in fixed income securities such as government and corporate bonds is difficult to miss.

Fixed income inflows are currently running at a record pace, largely thanks to deteriorating economic conditions that have spurred a spike in interest rates. Higher interest rates are translating into higher fixed income returns.

Over the first half of this year, investors in the United States poured US$99.4 billion (A$144.3 billion) into fixed income ETFs, according to Morningstar. Meanwhile, European demand for fixed income ETFs hit record levels as investors added US$36 billion (A$52.2 billion) into listed bond funds.

Australian fixed income inflows also surged over the six months to 30 June 2023, according to data from the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) and separate data from Vanguard. In Australia, the combined inflows into Australian-listed ETFs that invest in bonds exceeded the inflows into ETFs that invest in domestic and global shares. That’s despite the strong first half rally on global equity markets, including on the ASX.

Collectively, investment inflows into Australian and global fixed income ETF products totalled $2.49 billion over the first half, which compared with inflows of $1.56 billion into Australian and global equity ETF products.

SMSFs become more defensive

This uplift in fixed income inflows is also likely to extend to the investments being made by Australia’s self-managed superannuation fund cohort.

The 2023 Vanguard/Investment Trends SMSF Investor Report, released in June, found that many SMSF investors had started to increase their allocation to defensive assets in general. Conducted between February and March 2023, the annual report now in its 18th year represents the largest scale quantitative survey of Australian SMSF investors.

According to the report, one in five SMSFs acknowledge that the prevailing economic conditions have had a significant impact on their approach in selecting investments, with over a third of SMSFs indicating an increased allocation to cash and cash-like products.

Direct shares have seen the largest relative decline in terms of SMSF asset allocation on a dollar-weighted basis. Of the SMSF survey respondents, 36% said they had rebalanced their investment portfolio in the past year by between 10% and 50%. This had resulted in their average asset weighting to direct shares declining from 36% in 2022 to 31%, as shown below.

The primary reasons cited for this were because SMSF trustees had adopted a more defensive stance and had a negative outlook on overseas shares. With the current unsettled economic landscape of high interest rates and inflation, capital protection remains a priority for most SMSFs.

It is typical to see increased allocation to defensive assets such as fixed income or cash products during uncertain times. With interest rates rising, the data suggests SMSFs are favouring assets that they see as low risk.

The bottom line on cash

There is a common misconception that cash is a risk-free asset. While it is not prone to daily market volatility like shares are and is highly liquid, cash does have inherent investment risks.

A decade of record-low interest rates has meant that cash as an asset class has delivered an average annualised income return of just 1.9% since 2012. That’s lower than any other major asset class.

Worse still, after taking high inflation levels into account, hovering between 5% and 7% at time of writing, real cash returns have been negative for some time.

Although rising interest rates have created short-term pain for Australian investors, they have helped to improve long-term return expectations for bonds.

While bond prices typically reprice lower when interest rates rise, investors with a sufficient long-term investment horizon will ultimately be better off.

Investors are also flocking to bonds in their search for diversification and income as yields continue to stabilise (a signal that investors are becoming more optimistic), presenting an attractive alternative to holding cash which has generally underperformed bonds post rate hike cycles.

Being slightly higher-risk than cash, bonds are generally expected to outperform cash over the long term. As of June this year, Vanguard’s median annualised return expectations for Australian and global bonds ex-U.S (hedged to Australian dollars) over the next decade were 3.4% to 4.4%, and 3.6% to 4.6%, respectively.

 

Balaji Gopal is Head of Personal Investor and Financial Adviser Services at Vanguard Australia, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

For more articles and papers from Vanguard Investments Australia, please click here.

 

2 Comments
Ramani
August 13, 2023

The increased allocation to cash might be due to investment uncertainty (the present seems eternally volatile), reversion to normal minimum rates from 2023/24, members moving to a higher minimum bracket, publicised property sector collapses and need to rollover to an APRA fund or avoid the punitive 17% proxy death duty on super paid to tax non-dependents.

As with navigating non super assets during twilight time, a prudent estimate of cash flow needs allowing for health, relationship and capital demands and cashing up (dollar cost averaging on disinvestment) would help, but remembering that non super assets and all of liabilities must be included.

Cash risks exposing the nest egg to inflationary loss of value and opportunity loss of investing in more aggressive assets.
Government bonds, often touted as ‘safe’ are less so when sovereign country risk (remember the Asian and Global Financial Crises when once reputed governments quickly descended into insolvency), currency risk (easily manipulated by the Gordon Gekkos and greedy finance ministers) and interest rate risk ( as yields rise) are factored in.

There is no magic bullet. We should console ourselves that these are problems of having a nest egg. The Bangladeshi family buffeted by Brahmaputra floods is not so lucky.

Schadenfreude!

Simon
August 12, 2023

I don't get why anyone would waste their time investing in bonds with a 4.5% yield - and that is presumably before management fees - when there are numerous bank savings accounts offering 5% with no fees and no volatility.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

Navigating SMSF property compliance

The best income-generating assets for your portfolio

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.