Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 242

The hot spots in commercial real estate

Seven years into an upcycle, Australian non-residential (commercial) real estate returns have stabilised according to the latest PCA/IPD Australian Property Index published by MSCI. The Index, which tracks the performance of more than 1,470 institutionally owned office, retail, industrial, hotel, and medical properties, generated a total return of 11.9% in the year to December 2017. This is below the peak of 13.7% recorded in the year to 31 March 2016 but is still above the 5- and 10-year averages of 11.5% and 8.3% respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Non-Residential Real Estate Total Returns: 2007 – 2017

Source: MSCI

Non-residential real estate, like most asset classes, has been buoyed in recent years by bond yields falling to record lows. Most of the returns from real estate in the past few years has been due to capitalisation rate (yield) compression (as cap rates go down, values go up) rather than income growth (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Drivers of Non-Residential Property Investment Returns: 1995 – 2017

Source: MSCI

Direct real estate (returning 11.9%) and unlisted real estate (12.8%) typically have gearing between 20% and 50%, and they outperformed infrastructure (11.1%), listed real estate (8.5%) and bonds (5.8%), but underperformed equities (13.1%) during calendar 2017 (Figure 3). Investors hunting for yield were well rewarded if they invested in infrastructure and direct real estate with income returns of 8.6% and 5.8% respectively.

Figure 3: Asset Class Returns: Year to 31 December 2017

Source: MSCI

Sub-sector performance highlights demographic trends

Drilling down into the various sub-sectors shows a wide variation in performance. The best performing sector was ‘Other’ (medical, health, seniors living, and car parks) with a total return of 19.8% in the year to December 2017 followed by hotels at 14.5%. Notably, both these sectors were also the best performers in 2016.

Health and medical assets are now well and truly on the radar of institutions, as are the other alternate assets like childcare, seniors living, student accommodation, and data centres. Medical and health centres are benefiting from the aging population, changes in the delivery of medical services, and their higher yield relative to office, retail, and industrial assets, although the re-rating of the sector has seen the yield gap narrow in recent times.

Hotels, particularly in the gateway cities of Sydney and Melbourne, are booming. Strong growth in international and domestic tourism and buoyant business conditions in both cities has occupancy levels and room rates at near-record levels. Sydney’s average occupancy in 2017 was 85.9% (on some nights it was near impossible to find a room) and the average daily rate increased by 4.7% to $230 per night. Melbourne’s average occupancy in 2017 was 83.1%.

Figure 4: Non-Residential Real Estate Sectors: Total Returns 2016 and 2017

Source: MSCI

Retail real estate was the worst-performing sector with a total return of 10.1%. Given the challenges facing the retail sector, both structural (Amazon, on-line retailing) and cyclical (high household debt, low wage growth), many would be surprised that retail generated a double-digit return in 2017.

One explanation is that Super and Major Regional Centres (the mega retail centres) comprise almost 60% of the market capitalisation of the Retail Index, and those centres generated an average total return of 10.3% for the year (Figure 5). Globally, institutions are lining up to buy these so-called tier one ‘fortress malls’. The rationale: they dominate their trade area and are perceived to create a community destination (retail, entertainment, restaurants, medical etc.) rather than just a shopping experience. Therefore, they are best placed, of all the retail centre types, to withstand the onslaught of on-line retailing.

Figure 5: Retail Centre Total Returns: 2016 and 2017

Source: MSCI

In November 2017, the AMP Capital Shopping Centre Fund and the AMP Capital Diversified Property Fund each acquired a 25% stake in Indooroopilly Shopping Centre in Brisbane with management rights, in a deal worth more than $800 million on a yield of 4.5%. This was the biggest single-asset retail transaction and represented the first super-regional shopping centre to be sold via an on-market campaign since 2010. Other notable transactions in 2017 include GPT acquiring the 25% interest they didn’t already own in the 153,000 square metre Highpoint Centre in Melbourne for $680 million from their JV partner, the Besen Family, on a yield of 4.25%. GIC, the Singaporean Sovereign Wealth Fund, exchanged a 50% stake in Queen Victoria Building, The Galleries, and The Strand Arcade, all in the Sydney CBD, for a 49% stake in the ASX-listed Vicinity’s Chatswood Chase. The $562 million deal was struck at a yield of 4.75%.

The easy money has been made

Overall, at Folkestone we are underweight retail as we believe the headwinds will continue and there are better opportunities in other sectors. Deploying capital at this point in the cycle requires patience and discipline. With real estate yields across most sectors at record lows, the easy money has been made.

We expect the pace of cap rate (yield) compression to slow and the focus to move to asset-level income generation as the primary driver of non-residential real estate performance. Investors should recycle out of assets that have limited capacity to grow the cashflow and retain or buy assets where there are opportunities to actively manage, refurbish, or reposition to drive income growth. Asset specific factors will be critical including landlord tenant relationships, quality of tenants, lease expiry profile, location, and the active management of the building’s facilities. With record high electricity prices and electricity being one of the major costs of operating a building, efficient operating of the building will be crucial to optimising the bottom line.

 

Adrian Harrington is Head of Funds Management at Folkestone, a sponsor of Cuffelinks.

RELATED ARTICLES

Offices will live on in a post-COVID world

Not all non-residential real estate performs the same

Strong capital flows support non-residential real estate

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.