Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 385

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 385

  •   25 November 2020
  • 1
  •      
  •   

Weekend market update: Friday continued the strong run in global markets on vaccine optimism and the nomination of the dovish Janet Yellen as US Treasury Secretary. The S&P500 rose another 0.25% on Friday to close at a record high, up 2.3% for the week, while NASDAQ put on almost 1%. The market only hears good news for tech. And so much for the uncertainty of the US election ... the Australian market is up 11.4% in November so far and Europe has risen an amazing 18% despite more lockdowns. 

***

The Retirement Income Review was a welcome surprise packet. Far from being simply a 'fact based' set of statistics or rules, the Review takes a firm stance on many controversial subjects and gives momentum to superannuation alternatives. While not formally making recommendations, its findings are no less powerful. We explore five ways the Review will guide future policies, setting up retirement planning for significant changes.

It will stand as a turning point in the way we think about superannuation and retirement incomes, although as far back as 12 April 2018, I wrote an article pre-empting a major finding of the Review, saying:

"Superannuation involves a calculated drawdown of capital for most people. This is not only about 'income' but access to money and cash flow."

Two other pieces on this important document. David Bell highlights how the Review focusses on this need to draw money from assets (including super and the home) and not only live on income. Then we provide an edited transcript of Paul Keating's discussion with Leigh Sales on the ABC's 7.30, plus links to the full video. Keating was critical of major findings and not surprisingly, took the opportunity to make a passionate defense of the existing superannuation system.

My interview this week is with Steve Bennett of Charter Hall, who is also Chairman of the Property Funds Association. Many property sectors have been resilient during the pandemic, and he explains how funds with long-term leases to prestige clients provide an income alternative for investors, as well as exploring various property trends.

The rapid rise in share prices of tech stocks (and Tesla's market cap is now an extraordinary USD520 billion) is leading to portfolio concentrations that many investors may not have expected. In the US, the broad S&P500 is now one quarter tech. Amy Arnott asks whether it is time for some diversification into other sectors.

On a similar theme, for those looking for diversification opportunities in Emerging Markets, there is an even stronger index dominance of 'China tech', with the top 5 companies making up 40% of the index. The White Paper from Realindex is a warning to everyone to check what's in an index before assuming it delivers broad-based exposures.

For the moment, all governments are providing fiscal stimulus with a bottomless pit of debt, but at some point, it will need to be repaid. Kate Howitt looks at how the problem was faced in the past, Australia's adoption of similar policies and the likely future drag on share prices.

Amid all this market and political action, we can't avoid the need to manage our SMSFs. Graeme Colley warns of a little-discussed consequence of the new bankruptcy rules, that there is no forgiveness of the need to meet pension payments simply because an asset is no longer throwing off the required income.

What else is happening?

The one market most analysts expected to fall during the pandemic was residential property prices. How could they withstand the loss of migrants, rise in unemployment and businesses closing? Enter 2% borrowing rates, an easing of lending restrictions, fiscal spending and ex-pats returning. Among many who have changed their forecasts, ANZ Bank now expects a combined capitals small price rise in 2020 and up 9% in 2021. Loan servicing is easier than ever for most people, as a 2% fixed rate on $1 million in only $20,000 a year (assuming no repayment of principal).

Matt Comyn, CEO of CBA, said last week:

"I don't think the housing market is a risk anymore. I mean we've substantially upgraded our forecast in and around housing versus where we were in May and even in August."

Finally, while there are signs Donald Trump has slowly realised he has lost the election, his Twitter feed shows he continues to stoke the flames with fraud claims. He also takes credit for the strong US stock market.

Despite his failure to prove anything in courts, his stance on election legitimacy is widely supported by Americans. As a poll last week in The Economist showed, three-quarters of Republican voters believe there was 'a lot' of fraud in the election, although only 6% of Democrats held the same view. This chart illustrates how stark the blue/red divide has become.

 

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

 

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Indicative Listed Investment Company (LIC) NTA Report from Bell Potter

LIC Monthly Report from Morningstar

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 

  •   25 November 2020
  • 1
  •      
  •   
1 Comments
SF
November 29, 2020

Great stuff graham

Another thought provoking newsletter as usual, in particular about super

It raises some questions which really need to be addressed in your next edition

First question: why do we need super? Although we know paul keating thinks it’s a good idea, how many Australians agree with that?

After all the government leaves us alone on most other things like marriage, who our friends are, who we vote for, what car we drive, where we live, whether we buy a house or rent

The list goes on

Why is it the government’s business to make us save for our retirement? It might well be a good idea, but I think the pros and cons need to be spelt out and they haven’t been

Second idea, if we are to have super, why not make it saving for an annuity up to a maximum level, say to provide $30k pa?

Once you have reached your limit and saved enough to buy the annuity, then there are no more tax concessions

I think the pros and cons of this need to be discussed as well

One of the biggest loopholes in the current system is that you can withdraw the whole lot once you retire and use it for whatever; big holiday, gambling etc

Then go on the pension no questions asked

Another question: some newspaper articles have said that the current system is a big cost to the budget, so why not abandon super and provide for a bigger government pension in retirement?

You could still make it means tested or make it universal

Perhaps the best thing the government can do is invest in basic financial education at school because it is an area that is sadly lacking. Just ask the barefoot investor.

The Victorian government has just announced a financial literacy scheme for next year which sounds on the right track

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.