Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 664

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 664 with weekend update

  •   28 May 2026
  • 11
  •      
  •   

I’ve been reflecting on the debate within the comments section around the tax policy announced by the government. Firstlinks is not a political publication and instead seeks to inform investors about topics related to markets and building wealth.

This is where politics and markets intersect. Various government policies impact markets and strategies to build wealth. The tax proposals are an obvious example. Firstlinks will continue to cover those topics.

However, I’m going to be stricter about what I let through in the comments section. There are legitimate concerns about the tax proposals. I personally share those concerns and I have several misgivings about the impact on the country.

Significant changes to the tax code should be debated. But – at least on this publication – the debate needs to be productive. Name calling may be edifying but it doesn’t help to inform readers so I won’t publish those comments going forward. I hope this helps to keep the comments section focused on the relative merits of various proposals.

Firstlinks will also continue to publish content on both sides of a debate. Public discourse isn’t helped by Australians retreating into echo chambers.

If your comment doesn’t get published feel free to email me at [email protected] with any questions. Please feel free to leave comments on Firstlinks’ editorial policy.

Should investors be a little more worried?

Recently I’ve been speaking to members of the Morningstar Investment Management team. I haven’t come away from these conversations overly confident.

Markets are forward-looking and represent investors’ collective view of the future. Those expectations are priced into markets. Understanding what investors are anticipating there is no context for valuation levels.

A seemingly reasonable valuation can look optimistic in retrospect if the bottom falls out of the economy. High valuations are deceiving if there is enough growth.

Investors are exceedingly positive. And maybe the market is right to be optimistic, and everything will turn out ok.

The Strait of Hormuz may open and energy prices may drop leading to lower inflation. AI might be all it is cracked up to be with infrastructure investments paying off. We might be at the precipice of an AI enabled surge in productivity.

Is everyone optimistic?

A closer look at what is happening shows not every investor is quite so optimistic.

Bond yields are surging and at their highest level since 1997. This may indicate bond investors are not as confident inflation will be transitory. The equity risk premium narrows when yields are high as bond become more attractive.

It is also worth looking under the hood of the share market’s narrow rally. The S&P 500 increased in value by $9.19 trillion in market cap from March 30 to the record close on May 11. The 10 largest companies by market cap accounted for 62% of that gain and the semiconductor sector made up 43.80%.

Perhaps the AI boom will continue and momentum will win out. Perhaps the shares being left behind represent the best opportunity.

In the midst of the boom leading up the global financial crisis Citigroup CEO Chuck Price infamously said “when the music is playing you gotta get up and dance.” Investors are dancing – the question is, will the music will keep playing.

Final thoughts

The rosy scenario priced into the market may not eventuate. And that is what investors should ponder. This is not a universal call to action or a warning. All long-term investors deal with volatility and predictions about the future are rarely worth the paper they are written on.

Instead, it is a call to assess your own situation and how different market scenarios will impact your life. It is the investor that matters and not the investments.

Mark LaMonica

In this week’s edition Nick Maggiulli argues the more wealth you have the less risk you should take. Something to consider as this bull run continues.

Simonelle Mody extols the benefits of simplicity. She makes a compelling case. 

John Abernathy warns against complacency given US fiscal pressure, China’s shifting growth model and Australia’s structural constraints. In his view the global investment landscape is becoming less forgiving - yet markets have yet to fully adjust.

A sustained disruption through the Strait of Hormuz is forcing a rapid drawdown of global inventories. Paul Gooden writes that without a resolution, the arithmetic points to a supply shock by early August and a sharp surge in the oil price.

In the face of inflation and potential interest rate increases infrastructure remains a safe haven. According to Magellan looks at different infrastructure plays and how they might be impacted by the current environment.

Several programs and policies are in place to help first time homebuyers. Little attention is paid to the needs of renters. Jason Teh looks at the historical drivers of rent levels and what policies could ease the recent rent increases.

As super balances grow, SMSFs are becoming central to retirement outcomes. Michael Hamilton says without proper planning for “Armageddon” scenarios, even well-structured funds can unravel when it matters most.

Curated by Mark LaMonica and Leisa Bell

***

Weekend market update

From Shane Oliver, AMP

The past week has been dominated by developments around a US/Iran peace deal – but despite some gyrations its looking like a deal is on the way. The week started optimistically with Trump saying “final aspects & details…are…being discussed and will be announced shortly”. But this was followed by more strikes on Iran and Trump saying he is “not satisfied”. But the indications are now that a tentative deal has been reached, pending Trump’s sign-off with him saying he is making a “final determination”. This looks like it would reopen the Strait of Hormuz and extend the ceasefire for 60 days during which negotiations regarding Iran’s nuclear program will proceed. Of course, the deal could still collapse with both sides sending mixed messages. Iran’s desire to toll ships through the Strait, it’s enriched uranium, sanctions & Lebanon are sticking points. And a cynic might say the likely deal just leaves us where things were before the War with no progress on Iran’s nuclear ambitions so it could all flare up again.

But the pressure on Trump to do a TACO and strike a deal is very high as his approval rating is continuing to collapse heading into the mid-terms. He has said it doesn’t matter but it likely matters to him bigly as the longer the Strait remains closed the more global oil reserves run down leaving the clock ticking on when the full impact of the roughly 12-13% cut to global oil production hits the global economy in full resulting in another spike in oil prices and even higher US gasoline prices – which US voters hate.

With a deal likely nearing oil prices have fallen back to the lower end of the range they have been in since the War started. Oil futures are continuing to price a fall on the grounds that the Strait will be opened eventually but that prices will be above pre-War levels as it will take a while for oil and fuel production to ramp up again with a risk premium priced in to allow for the risk of a resumption of the conflict. This is in line with our own views. 

Helped along by the reports of a peace deal nearing agreement and ongoing optimism about the boost from AI related demand to profit growth, global share markets rose over the last week. US shares rose 1.8% to a new record high, Japanese shares rose 4.7% also to a new record high, Eurozone shares rose 0.5% and Chinese shares rose 0.9%. Australian shares rose 0.9% for the week, with gains in retailers and miners partly offset by falls in telcos and energy shares, but they remain significant underperformers. While the US share market has surged to new record highs helped also by very strong profit growth and still solid economic activity, the Australian share market has been continuing to struggle not far from its March lows in response to profit downgrades, three rate hikes from the RBA, capital gains tax changes and greater scepticism locally regarding a quick reopening of the Strait. 

News of a peace deal saw bond yields fall on hopes for lower inflation with lower oil prices. Metal and gold prices rose over the week, but iron ore prices and Bitcoin fell. The $A rose slightly as the $US fell slightly.

Despite optimism for lower oil prices, central banks continued to edge in the direction of higher interest rates over the last week. Another Fed Governor - Lisa Cook this week, Christopher Waller last week - came out warning of a rate hike if inflation doesn’t start to fall soon. And unfortunately, US core private final consumption inflation rose further in April to 3.3%yoy. And both the Bank of Korea and Reserve Bank of New Zealand while leaving rates on hold warned of rate hikes ahead. Its early days, but as can be seen in the next chart the percentage of global central banks hiking is hooking up.

The risk here is that expectations for higher inflation and rates could drive another leg higher in global bond yields which could put pressure on share markets. A quick reopening of the Strait could short-circuit this though.

In Australia though, mixed inflation data for April provided a bit of relief. The good news was that headline CPI inflation slowed more than expected to 4.2%yoy from 4.6%yoy with a bigger than expected fall in fuel prices (helped by the fuel tax cut) and free public transport in some states. Electricity prices fell 0.9%mom and the annual price ruling from the energy regulator points to falling prices from July helped by record output from wind farms and batteries. (So more clean energy can lower electricity prices!) The bad news was that underlying or trimmed mean inflation edged up further to 3.4%yoy from 3.3%yoy and appears to be tracking in line with the RBA’s forecast for a 0.95%qoq/3.8%yoy rise in the current quarter as a whole.

Some good news on the underlying inflation front was that the breadth of price rises has improved slightly with slightly more CPI items seeing inflation below 2%yoy than above 3%yoy. But against this the second round impacts from the oil supply shock to transport costs, plastics, food prices etc are yet to impact, housing costs are continuing accelerate with new dwelling prices up 0.7%mom and a rise in asking rents pointing to higher rents, business surveys continue to show a sharp rise in cost pressures and there is a high risk that an acceleration in minimum and award wage rises will contribute to stronger wages growth.

On balance the mixed inflation data for April, coming on the back of soft April jobs data, depressed confidence and signs of softening household spending will likely see the RBA leave rates on hold at its June meeting as it waits to see the impact from its three back to back rate hikes and how the oil supply shock pans out. However, we are continuing to pencil in a further and likely final rate hike in August as underlying inflation remains too high. The money is currently pricing zero chance of a rate hike in June and a 70% probability of a further hike by year end.

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

Australian ETF Review from Bell Potter

Listed Investment Company (LIC) Indicative NTA Report from Bell Potter

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 

  •   28 May 2026
  • 11
  •      
  •   
11 Comments
James#
May 31, 2026

Interesting take on Chalmers' proposed changes to CGT from an article in the AFR 31 May 26, suggesting that Chalmers has the economics all wrong or it's just a tax grab. A few extracts:

"The animating premise of removing the CGT discount is, to use the treasurer’s own words: “better align the treatment of labour income and asset income in the tax system.”

But there is no economic rationale for doing this. In fact, economists have consistently argued the opposite.

"The Mirrlees Review in the United Kingdom, chaired by the late Nobel prizewinning economist James Mirrlees, said the following: “economic theory provides no compelling reason why capital income should be taxed at the same rate as labour income. According to our proposal, the capital income tax rate should be flat and well below the top marginal tax rate on labour income.”

That’s Mirrlees – pioneer of the field of “optimal income taxation”. And our very own Ken Henry’s review said this: “Comprehensive income taxation, under which all savings income is taxed the same as labour income, is not an appropriate policy goal or benchmark.”

So do Treasury and the treasurer disagree with Australia’s finest treasury secretary and the most distinguished tax economist of all time? If so, why?

...

The hard truth is that the CGT changes are a productivity tax in the middle of a profound productivity crisis. They are a productivity-seeking missile that identifies the most dynamic, highest growth, job-creating businesses and taxes them at huge rates upon sale.

....

Of course, the real reason for these tax proposals is to fund the government’s spending addiction. Treasury Secretary Jenny Wilkinson – in a what can only be described as a “bless me Father for I have sinned” moment, last
Thursday – admitted as much. She said: “Revenue needs to be raised from somewhere.”

Got it. It’s the Slick Willie Sutton approach to public finance. When asked why he robbed banks, Sutton deadpanned: “Because that’s where the money is.”

Commonwealth Bank CEO Matt Comyn threw drowning Chalmers a life preserver last week by suggesting the CGT changes should be limited to residential property. Chalmers, bizarrely, promptly threw it back and continues to thrash around in the choppy waters of his disastrous policy."

11
Lauchlan Mackinnon
June 01, 2026

James#, I thought that was a great article, from Richard Holden in the AFR. It's at https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/there-is-no-economic-case-for-taxing-work-and-investment-the-same-20260528-p601ke for people who can access it (it's behind a paywall).

Alan Kohler was also questioning on the ABC site why the government thought this is their "hill to die on" - why they expended their limited political capital on this mis-step: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-01/capital-gains-tax-negative-gearing-housing-chalmers-albanese/106742204

1
Lauchlan Mackinnon
May 28, 2026

Hi Mark,

Thanks for the thoughts.

I'd zoom out and change the context a little.

Context piece #1: where are we in the market cycle?

Obviously in the larger scheme of things we have been in a long up-cycle, and signs are on the face of it troubling. The Shiller CAPE ratio and Buffet indicator suggest stocks may be getting overvalued.

But the pundits think a lot of that valuation is driven by AI, and it's hard to say whether AI valuations are overvalued or not. It's a technology of the future, and we won't know its value till we get there. No one can say for sure we're in a bubble and it's due to burst.

The oil crisis will play out across supply chains for months and drive inflation. No one knows where this will go.

It is, as the economists say, "genuine uncertainty" in the Knighting sense - not probabilistic risk.

That leads to thing #2.

Context piece #2: what is your investing strategy?

If you are a long-term investor with a long time horizon, or a dividend investor, does it matter much what the market's going to do?

How the market will behave will matter in the short to medium term, but the evidence suggests that in the long term we'll be back to growth.

So, for a long-term investor, the strategy is probably just keep ongoing going, and - when the dip happens - buy the dip to the extent they can. Nothing to see here! ;) Nothing to worry about. :)

For people entering retirement shortly, or in retirement and generating income, it's a different set of issues. They do need to take this seriously. If I was entering retirement in the next few years, or in retirement now, I'd be building up a cash buffer and/or allocating to a more defensive portfolio now, as a defensive measure.

How this impacts people depends on the context of their situation and goals. :)

7
Ben
May 30, 2026

Hi Mark,
Agree with your decision to be stricter on comments published. Diversity of opinion should be welcomed, but not partisan political comments.

5
GeorgeB
May 30, 2026

"Diversity of opinion should be welcomed, but not partisan political comments."

But it can often be hard to tell the difference.

2
Sam Kolber
May 31, 2026

skolber

"Should we be worried", is easier to answer, by accepting the truth that the future is unpredictable and can only be guessed at. This applies to stock markets, weather or any other future guessing endeavour . Stock market regulators acknowledge this by statements such as "past performance cannot be relied on as a predictor of future performance".

Stephen F
May 31, 2026

Hi Mark you raise the topic of market timing. Should we hold back from investing if we think the market is too high? Should we sell up if the market is falling? These are manifestations of market timing. I agree with Lauchlan Mackinnon in saying if you have a long term strategy just keep on going. Stick to your strategy. We had an economist working for us once, who was on TV a lot. He often told me that the market goes up eight years out of ten. If you bet at the start of the year that the market is going to go up you will be right 80% of the time. Any punter would agree that an 80% chance of winning is pretty good odds. So why even get involved in market timing? Another strategy of reducing the market timing problem is to include 30% of gold bullion in your portfolio. Gold has a well demonstrated negative correlation with shares in bear markets. Gold doesn't pay an income but it compensates with capital growth.

Kevin
June 01, 2026

The people that love gold will never have a word said against it.The big problem is the lack of facts,and the repetition of financial ( sales) jargon. The idea is to make as much money as possible,not lose as little as possible,a very old quote.

To show it then in 1980 the Dow could be bought for an ounce of gold roughly.Gold was at a record high. What is gold now, US$ 4500 an ounce? A roughly 5.3 times return,slightly less,taking gold at $850 an ounce. The dow is at 51,000 roughly ,that's a 60 fold return plus all the dividends that you have missed out on.Gold is a really big drag on long term investing. You can do the same calculation using the all ords and the accumulation index. From memory in 1980 the A and US$ were roughly the same. The all ords is what $8500,an ounce of gold isn't worth A$ 8500,and you've missed out on a lot of dividend income over 45 years.These dividends of course should be reinvested.Then you have around $1.2 million in Australian shares,that's starting at 1000 rather than 850

From memory Vanguard calculate from 1970.They don't calculate gold. Gold @ $45 an ounce then?. So a 100 fold return. Again from memory as they start with $10K the US with dividends reinvested had gone from $10K to $5 million,a 500 fold return. The Australian index had gone from $10,000 to ~ $2 million,a 200 fold return. The difference in the growth was around just less than 3% over the long term. The US grew faster by that margin,Australia doesn't have a lot of companies that operate world wide,the US does.

Kevin
June 02, 2026

Vanguard figures are,from 1 Jan 1970 to 30 April 2026.Starting @ 10 K,a lot of money back then so start it at $1K if you want

Us shares $5.882 million ( 12% average growth)
International shares $2.367 million.(10.2%)
Aus shares $1.735 million (9.6%)
Aus bonds/cash $500,000 (7.2% ).

Over a long period then you can see the difference 1.8% makes between US and international shares..That isn't a big difference.
Never underestimate how many people will insist that the end of the world is now . They'll do their ? Fisher impersonation,the dow reached an all time high (300 ? I n the 1929 crash ) ,it will never reach those highs again.

If you name individual companies then as long as they can think of the name of a company that went bust,that proves the individual company will go bust. While it is not 30 June yet take not of the price of gold,the all ords,it seems to be the ASX 200 now,and wait 50 years Every day for the next 50 years people will still deny what is happening.

Dudley
June 02, 2026


'History says US market outperformance versus Australia will turn'
'The forces shaping the next long-term cycle. '
https://www.morningstar.com.au/markets/history-says-us-market-outperformance-versus-australia-will-turn

'The second lesson to be drawn from this data is that market strength runs in cycles.'

The Debt Volcano might collapse into Debt Caldera just at Peak Effluvium.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The ultimate superannuation EOFY checklist 2026

Here is a checklist of 28 important issues you should address before June 30 to ensure your SMSF or other super fund is in order and that you are making the most of the strategies available.

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

Lithium's rally is real this time – but no-one trusts it

The lithium rally mirrors the early-2010s tech stock surge, with demand set to double by 2030. Supply has been slow to respond, creating a market deficit for future tech like humanoid robotics and solid-state batteries.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 662 with weekend update

The debate over the budget is increasingly shaped by frustration and perceptions of unfairness, rather than clear-eyed assessment of policy outcomes.

Two months into retirement

A retirement researcher's take on retirement and her focus on each of her six resource buckets to stay engaged during the transition and beyond.

Latest Updates

Are the government’s CGT changes better for young investors?

New CGT rules promise fairness, but could young investors lose out? A practical scenario reveals how changes impact deposit goals, investment choices, and long-term wealth building for the next generation.

Retirement

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Investment strategies

AI can’t pick winning funds, but it can help you avoid losers

Machine learning has been touted a game changer investment management. But a new study overturns claims that AI can generate positive alpha in mutual funds. Here are some practical takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Inflation BIG picture: Boomers got lucky, next Gen not so much

A 150-year view shows inflation's upward bias, driven by shifting monetary regimes and war stocks. This marks an end to the low-inflation boom that enriched boomers and ushers in a higher-inflation era for younger investors.

Planning

Tax deductibility of financial advice improves affordability

A shrinking adviser workforce and rising costs are squeezing access to financial advice, just as demand surges. Expanded tax deductibility offers a modest but meaningful boost to affordability.

Retirement

Retirement in reality – 3 months in

A reflection on travel mishaps, smart decision-making, time pressures and rebuilding health habits. Three months in, here's how to navigate the surprising realities of life after work.

Taxation

Calculating the business cost of Australia’s new 'productivity tax'

Amid a national productivity crisis, new economic analysis finds the tax changes in the 2026 Federal Budget create Australia’s first-ever by design 'Productivity Tax', where young people will pay the biggest price.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.