Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 346

What is the likely effect of COVID-19 on the Australian economy?

In late January, we outlined two possible scenarios for economic effect on the Australian economy due to the spread of Coronavirus (2019-nCov) subsequently re-named COVID-19. The first was a situation similar to SARS, albeit with some key differences. Despite the lower fatality rate, it appears COVID-19 spreads more easily, or has got a greater hold before it was discovered. While both outbreaks occurred in China, the Chinese economy is far larger and more globally integrated now than it was in 2003. This is due to many years of high growth rates, meaning the absolute effect of even a small decline in China's economic growth will be far more significant to a greater number of countries – particularly Australia. With SARS, the virus was contained and effectively eradicated over a nine-month period.

In the second more frightening scenario, the virus is not contained and becomes a situation like the H1N1 swine flu pandemic, where the virus circulates freely round the world. Estimates by the WHO and other reputable sources for the 2009 – 2010 H1N1 pandemic, put infection rates at 11% to 21% of the global population. Between 284,000 and 579,000 people died from H1N1 which proved fatal for 0.034% of those infected based on these numbers. The frightening difference is that COVID-19 seems to have a fatality rate closer to 2%, meaning it is approximately 60 times as deadly.

Initial scenarios morph into a third

At this stage the situation is still uncertain, but some variation between the two scenarios is seemingly becoming a more likely third option. While technically the virus is either contained and eradicated or not contained and becomes widespread, the third scenario is the virus is contained for an extended period of time, sufficient for treatments and vaccines to be developed before it becomes ‘not contained’.

Our logic in contemplating this third scenario is that experience on the Diamond Princess cruise ship indicates how contagious the virus appears to be where one person can cause the spread of the virus to over 600 people in just over two weeks - and this is despite quarantine efforts. Also of concern is once testing was extended from those people who had symptoms to those that did not, it became clear there were significant numbers of people who were infected but had no symptoms. If these people are contagious and able to infect others, then stopping the spread of the virus within communities will be extremely difficult.

The second fact supporting this argument is the number of infections in South Korea, Iran and Italy and to a lesser extent Singapore, Japan and Hong Kong where cases are rising. In these countries the virus has essentially ‘escaped’ in that efforts to trace all the people infected from an initial carrier have likely failed and the virus is now circulating in the community. If new cases cannot be isolated quickly enough, then the virus cannot be eradicated and will either continue to circulate at low levels for a long period; or, if it is highly contagious then number of infections will rise rapidly and more extreme ‘Wuhan-type’ measures will be necessary. Countries with currently contained infections will likely begin to institute travel bans (similar to the ones in force currently for China) on anyone coming from these places to other countries.

Economic disruption

Economically, the impact of steps to contain the virus being isolation, quarantine and travel restrictions are likely to be extremely disruptive. The full effects of factory shutdowns in China have abated to date as inventories have been run-down to cover production disruptions at a customer level and built up to avoid production disruptions at a supplier level.

However, this is a temporary situation and it is only recently the flow-on effects of the shutdowns on business in Hubei province have really begun to affect other parts of what is a very large and complex supply chain. It currently appears as if the restrictions will need to stay in place for much longer than initially forecast by optimists because the COVID-19 virus is both deadly and contagious.

Further as we've seen with the recent spread of the virus to other countries, efforts to contain it are likely to cause economic disruption locally, which may be mild at first but may become more severe over time if the virus continues to spread. For example, it would be fair to say the Tokyo Olympics are under threat of cancellation at this point if the local situation in Japan worsens in the next five months.

We predict this will have a greater effect on Australia than other countries because of our very close links to China and the facts that:

  1. China is our largest trading partner due to resource exports,
  2. one in four of our international students are from China and
  3. one in six of our tourists are from China.

It is not unthinkable the impact on Australia will be enough to cause negative GDP growth within our economy in both the first and second quarters of this calendar year. Of course, this is the technical definition of a recession and in such a circumstance the RBA will almost certainly look to cut interest rates from their current levels and also probably introduce other emergency measures as well.

This recession if it occurs will likely be different from many others experienced previously in that different parts of the Australian economy will be disproportionately affected. The three areas above are obvious ones, but secondarily airlines and the travel industry in general are likely to suffer greatly as the obvious method for Australia to protect itself is to stop the free movement of people between itself and infected areas, and as these grow, the list of countries with travel bans is only likely to increase in the short to medium term.

 

Moray Vincent is executive director Amicus Advisory, an independent fixed income research firm that provides advisory services to conservative wholesale credit investors. Operating since 2008, it currently has around $1.8 billion of funds under advice.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

China’s new model is a plan for a hostile world

Global recession looms as debt balloons

Which country will be the next China?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.