Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 409

China’s new model is a plan for a hostile world

Sir Arthur Lewis (1915-1991) was an economist from Saint Lucia in the Caribbean who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1979 for his theories on development. His ‘dual sector model’ suggested that economies can modernise without triggering inflation because the growing industrial sector can rely on a large supply of farm workers to work for low, but not subsistence, wages. This allows industry to earn, then reinvest, excessive profits. But one day the stream of peasants dries up. When a developing economy reaches this ‘Lewis turning point’, wages growth exceeds productivity, industrial profits decline, investment drops and inflation stirs.

Major changes approaching for China

A big challenge for China is that the country is approaching a Lewis turning point at the same time it faces a ‘demographic time bomb’, a term that describes the rapid ageing of its 1.4 billion population. Another test is that China is confronting the ‘middle-income trap’. This is a term for when a country’s initial and successful drive to industrialise becomes bogged at middle-income levels unless the country can develop the skilled workforces, sophisticated manufacturing, financial sectors, institutions, governance standards and rule of law that advanced countries possess.

On top of these challenges, another has emerged for Beijing, along with an opportunity. China’s growing political and economic clout has created a hostile global environment but a relatively weaker US.

China’s policymakers have long seen the first two challenges coming. Along with some institutional reform, their answer was to make domestic demand a bigger driver of economic growth. But the pivotal market reforms of the past 15 years to rebalance the economy away from exports and investment appears too inadequate a solution for Chinese leaders in a harsher world but one where it senses the US is vulnerable.

Beijing’s response to help double the economy’s size from 2020 to 2035 and to ensure its global influence? A 'dual circulation' strategy, which marries the ‘external circulation’ of global demand with the ‘internal circulation’ of domestic demand.

The split-economy strategy emerged from a Politburo meeting in May 2020 and appears deliberately ambiguous. Official pronouncements since indicate the plan aims to reduce China’s reliance on other countries for national-security reasons while boosting the country’s ‘soft’ global power to approach (thus nullify) that of the US. While the previous rebalancing aimed to lessen China’s dependence on exports, the dual-circulation strategy seeks to limit China’s reliance on imports and the US-dominated global financial and trading system.

The strategy’s essence is prioritising domestic production, innovation and self-sufficiency. It is a call to turn China into a sophisticated manufacturing hub, form China-centric global production networks that multinationals come to rely on, develop a yuan-based international financial network, and possibly turn China into a military-technological complex. The means to these goals include subsidies, export controls, data restrictions and dangling China’s consumer market as an enticement to attract foreign capital and technology.

Source: World Bank Open Data

A challenge for other countries including Australia

Just as important is what Beijing’s dual-circulation strategy does not do. The policy lacks any unleashing of market forces. It is not a retreat into North Korean-style autarky. The strategy heralds no easing of the Communist Party’s political control. Nor is it a plan to break the international order.

The dual-circulation strategy, in many ways, might seem a partial shift. But it is poised to drive China’s economy, boost its regional hegemony, make China a leader in industrial, technological and financial spheres, and advance China’s global influence. The strategy is likely to challenge some of the countries and industries dependent on China as an export destination and offer a fresh competitor to industrial powerhouses such as Germany that export capital goods. It foretells of renewed pushes to internationalise China’s financial system and promote the use of the yuan to rival the US-dollar-based global financial network.

The plan signals more significant trade agreements rather than any drive to liberalise world trade. It flags further Chinese efforts to dominate global bodies so it can influence the rules-based global order and set global technology standards. It likely means an intensification of the clash with the US to dominate the technologies of tomorrow. China’s dual-circulation strategy signals that an era approaches when international linkages are more an overt means to enhance global power rather than a cooperative way to boost economic efficiency.

Source: World Bank Open Data

To be sure, China’s new strategy might not be that noticeable over time and Beijing’s reluctance to provide details means it could morph into anything. It’s too early to emphatically rebut those who dismiss it as just the old rebalancing strategy. Same goes for responding to those who say it’s just an extension of the Made in China 2025 drive for technological leadership and the Belt and Road Initiative. There are major developments that don’t sit easily within the strategy. Beijing’s aggression in the South China Sea, crackdown on Hong Kong, intimidation of Taiwan and ‘wolf warrior’ diplomacy risk a backlash that would nullify any advancements in soft power. The dual-circulation strategy might come with a larger-than-expected cost to efficiency. The strategy relies on a certain level of foreign participation and human-rights abuses might deter some western companies.


Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

The next step in China's global power move

But if developments ‘follow the money’ as they often do, China’s supersized economy will be enough of a magnet to tie much of the world to China. There’s every chance Beijing will engineer a partial decoupling from the US-led world on its own terms. Such a separation would form the next phase of China’s modernisation, the next leap in its global power, perhaps even the next ‘China shock’, where China’s industrialisation so far formed the first shock.

 

Michael Collins is an Investment Specialist at Magellan Asset Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only, not investment advice. For the full version of this article and to view sources, go to: https://www.magellangroup.com.au/insights/.

For more articles and papers from Magellan, please click here.

 

11 Comments
Denial
June 01, 2021

Given the abject failure of the Belt and Roads infrastructure investments to date (all projects drowning in debt) and the increasing use of autocratic rule from the CCP is also thought to be a sign that that the masses aren't as congruent as we're lead to believe. The descent shown post COVID to "citizen supervisors" following the deaths of their relatives is a case in point that human nature doesn't work like the CCP want it to. Will the Chinese authorities now move from One Child to negatively incentivising families to the just announced Three Child policy given "time bomb" you noted?

Ken
June 03, 2021

Unfortunately, it is always China that is the bad boy. The western press forgets the wars and killings America has been waging since world war2 on anybody that dares question its policies. They have destroyed a greater part of the muslim middle east, Africa and South America. 

Ruth
June 03, 2021

We know Ken, but the USA has never taken territory from another country; their primary motivation has been to trade. I don't think the CCP thinks that way. The USA is a lot more introspective about their actions now. The USA has not unleashed a disease on every country in the world. It disturbs me that 3rd world countries we had hoped could develop themselves are faced with this setback, missing much needed tourist dollars, and that China is now in those countries behaving as if it is a saviour.

frank
May 31, 2021

USA will always be the dominant economy and this decoupling of china is just propaganda .Take for example the per capita income of each country it is huge . China is still considered a third world economy . The communist party is selling this propaganda to keep the chinese people happy ,and to stay in power .If not we will see Tiananmen stage 2

Ruth
June 03, 2021

Not sure about that Frank. Empires rise and fall. China is determined to emerge dominant and the USA is shows signs of weakening as an empire. It's difficult for me to analyse as so much is unknown about the real situation in China in so many ways. I feel that whoever makes the greater technological advancements may hold the upper hand. I wouldn't like to see China get hold of Taiwan's superior microchip industry. We live in interesting times!

C
May 30, 2021

Mervyn, do we really want to live in a country dominated by America? The individualism the exceptionalism, the personality politics, the military- industrial complex. Our PM can send us to war. Should one individual hold so much power.

Ruth
June 03, 2021

I think China is already at war with the west. They are using various strategies to win, the primary one being economic. This is evident from their state-sponsored newspaper articles and the way they have chosen to strike against their neighbours during their pandemic-inducing weakness, which will last for years. The USA is weakening but is still our most important ally. Do you want to help defend the country or not?

Peter Cosh
May 27, 2021

Mervyn, with respect, you contradict yourself. While you make some good points, I don't think Jennifer's thinking is short term at all.
I agree we have technological capabilities, but as yet we haven't been able to take advantage of them in any significant way (with a few exceptions). Unless we can change this, we will remain heavily reliant on resources. I also agree our self serving politicians are a millstone around Australia's neck, but again unless we can change this, we will not progress as we should. It seems our politicians first thought when developing policy is "how is this going to benefit my career and help me get another term?" rather than what is the best benefit for Australia? The areas of trade, defence, immigration etc., deserve better.
These are two big "ifs" and unless addressed, we will all fall "into China's trap". Jennifer is correct to be concerned about Australia's future, as we all should be.

James
May 27, 2021

It is strange that a financial website got into geo politics rhetoric?

Jennifer
May 27, 2021

We don't make much, we did stuff out of the ground and sell it to China. It finances our way of life. When this stops, will we be the first Australians whose grandchildren are worse off than we are?

Mervyn Cross
May 27, 2021

Jennifer, do you really want your grandchildren to be in an Australia dominated by China? Your thinking is very short-sighted and way out of date. Australia has the technical knowhow and ability to achieve much more than simply be a miner. That is very evident today; just take the time to investigate what many Australian companies are researching and developing.You will be surprised.The limiting factor is our self-serving politicians, who are incapable of formulating strategies to exploit our capabilities and formulate a vision where Australia needs to be in 20 or 30 years time. Jennifer, you are falling into China's trap.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Is China’s regulatory reform stifling ‘animal spirits’?

Five trends shaping investments in China: 2021 and beyond

Just how reliant on China are we?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 433 with weekend update

There’s this story about a group of US Air Force generals in World War II who try to figure out ways to protect fighter bombers (and their crew) by examining the location of bullet holes on returning planes. Mapping the location of these holes, the generals quickly come to the conclusion that the areas with the most holes should be prioritised for additional armour.

  • 11 November 2021

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 431 with weekend update

House prices have risen at the fastest pace for 33 years, but what actually happened in 1988, and why is 2021 different? Here's a clue: the stockmarket crashed 50% between September and November 1987. Looking ahead, where did house prices head in the following years, 1989 to 1991?

  • 28 October 2021

Why has Australia slipped down the global super ranks?

Australia appears to be slipping from the pantheon of global superstar pension systems, with a recent report placing us sixth. A review of an earlier report, which had Australia in bronze position, points to some reasons why, and what might need to happen to regain our former glory.

How to help people with retirement spending decisions

Super funds will soon be required to offer retirement income strategies for members in decumulation. With uncertain returns, uncertain timelines, and different goals, it's possibly “the hardest, nastiest problem in finance".

Tips when taking large withdrawals from super

You want to take a lump sum from your super, but what's the best way? Should it come from you or your spouse, or the pension or accumulation account. There is a welcome flexibility to select the best outcome.

Latest Updates

Interviews

John Woods on diversification using asset allocation

All fund managers now claim to take ESG factors into account, but a multi-asset ethical fund will look quite different from a mainstream fund. Faced with low fixed income returns, alternatives have a bigger role.

SMSF strategies

Don't believe the SMSF statistics on investment allocation

The ATO's data on SMSF asset allocation is as much as 27 months out-of-date and categories such as cash and global investments are reported incorrectly. We should question the motives of some who quote the numbers.

Investment strategies

Highlights of reader tips for young investors

In this second part on the reader responses with advice to younger people, we have selected a dozen highlights, but there are so many quality contributions that a full list of comments is also attached.

Investment strategies

Four climate themes offer investors the next big thing

Climate-related companies will experience exponential growth driven by consumer demand and government action. Investors who identify the right companies will benefit from four themes which will last decades.

Investment strategies

Inflation remains transitory due to strong long-term trends

There is momentum to stop calling inflation 'transitory' but this overlooks deep-seated trends. A longer-term view will see companies like ARB, Reece, Macquarie Telecom and CSL more valuable in a decade.

Infrastructure

Infrastructure and the road to recovery

Infrastructure assets experienced varying fortunes during the pandemic, from less travel at airports to strong activity in communications. On the road to recovery, what role does infrastructure play in a portfolio?

Economy

The three prices that everyone should worry about

Among the myriad of numbers that bombard us every day, three prices matter greatly to the world economy. Recent changes in these prices help to understand the potential for a global recovery and interest rates.

Shares

Why green hydrogen is central to achieving net zero

Hundreds of green hydrogen projects show this energy opportunity is finally being taken seriously. While a cost disadvantage and technical challenges need to be overcome, it promises to deliver a path to net zero.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.